Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

ctu-vras / depth_correction Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW
10.0 10.0 0.0 20.38 MB

Self-Supervised Depth Correction of Lidar Measurements from Map Consistency Loss

License: BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

Jupyter Notebook 6.93% Python 92.62% CMake 0.07% Shell 0.39%
lidar-point-cloud mapping self-supervised-learning

depth_correction's People

Contributors

ruslanagishev avatar tpet avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar

depth_correction's Issues

About the pipeline in the work

Hi, sorry for bothering. After I look closer at your work, I have a question for the pipeline designed.
The pipeline provided in paper and Google drive slides are slightly different (pipelines are shown below).

In the paper, I notice that there's one more line (connecting scan and SLAM) added in the pipeline, and there seems to be no such implementation in the codes provided. Thus, I think the pipeline in the slides are more accurate. I am wondering which pipeline is designed for this work.

Question about fee_corridor data set.

Dear authors,

After downloading the fee_corridor data set, I notice that there are two folders of point clouds in sequences. One is named as ouster_points and the other is static_outster_points, the former on consists of around 100 frames while the later one consists of around 30 frames. I'm wondering what are the differences between these two folders. Do they come from different environments, or simply the way they sampled are different. And if the former one is sampled when the vehicle is moving, there might be the distortions of the points, then how could we deal with such case?

Thanks!

Question about the result

Hi, sorry for bothering again.
From the paper I notice that the reconstructed scene is skewed upwards (shown below)
going_up

However, after I run your code, I notice that the scene is actually skewed downwards, which is similar to the figure(shown below) in this paper. And I agree that

The map is bending depending on which wall the robot was closest to while driving

going_down

As a result, I am wondering why the graph in the paper is skewed upwards, or if I did not understand correctly.
By the way, I will greatly appreciate it if you could upload the weights and configs of the hyperparameters in the near future, so that I can do some comparative experiments.

Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.