Comments (8)
Supporting execute triggers with timing=after is a bad idea.
If you have an execute trigger with timing=after and an illegal instruction then the illegal instruction is the highest priority according to table 13. You take the trap, update mepc, and go to mtvec. Then the "mcontrol/mcontrol6 after (on previous instruction)" would be the highest priority on the first instruction of the handler. Because MIE=0, this trigger would not fire and the trigger is completely lost (since there is no pending bit).
If you had timing=before then "mcontrol/mcontrol6 execute address before" would have higher priority than illegal instruction and mepc would point to the current instruction (which has not yet executed and gone to the illegal instruction handler). This is obviously much more desirable.
from riscv-debug-spec.
Thanks for your explanation.
I don't quite understand the phrase "Because MIE=0, this trigger would not fire and the trigger is completely lost (since there is no pending bit)" in your answer. What is the relationship between MIE and trigger?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
from riscv-debug-spec.
Thanks for your explanation.
I don't quite understand the phrase "Because MIE=0, this trigger would not fire and the trigger is completely lost (since there is no pending bit)" in your answer. What is the relationship between MIE and trigger?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
from riscv-debug-spec.
I don't quite understand the phrase "Because MIE=0, this trigger would not fire and the trigger is completely lost (since there is no pending bit)" in your answer. What is the relationship between MIE and trigger?
See section 5.4 ("Native Triggers") in the spec. I was assuming that you'd implement this MIE option but if you implement the mte option then I would have said the exact same thing except using "mte=0" instead of "MIE=0".
from riscv-debug-spec.
Thank you very much for your answer !
from riscv-debug-spec.
Thanks for your explanation.
In general, mstatus.mie is a switch used to determine whether to respond to interrupts. In the debug spec, MIE is also used to control whether to respond to trigger exceptions. What is the significance of controlling trigger exception response through MIE?
from riscv-debug-spec.
What is the significance of controlling trigger exception response through MIE?
MIE generally indicates whether a handler is reentrant or not. If a handler has MIE=1 then it definitely can tolerate a trap happening. If a handler has MIE=0 then it probably cannot (though maybe it can). MIE is the only thing that acts like this and, although it may be overly conservative, it will guarantee that triggers don't cause traps that do not allow us to eventually get back to normal execution.
Alternatively, we could have done something like Smdbltrp/Ssdbltrp did by adding MDT and SDT bits to mstatus. But that involved changing a CSR that's generally outside the scope of the debug TG. Option 2 of using mte is similar to MDT but it has limitations and it requires context switch code to deal with another CSR.
from riscv-debug-spec.
Thank you very much for your answer !
from riscv-debug-spec.
Related Issues (20)
- A typo in [5.4. Native Triggers] HOT 1
- How to halt or resume multiple harts simultaneously? HOT 4
- Stored value availability to TM in case of AMOs HOT 6
- Hit bit interaction with action conflict when several triggers of the same priority match HOT 3
- How to reset the DM on the first connection on both 0.13 and 1.0 spec versions HOT 7
- Cross Trigger definition in RISC-V HOT 3
- Trigger match on csrrs/csrrc to tdata1 HOT 13
- Why debugger lose control of the hart while executing a program not terminate with an ebreak instruction
- Ambiguous requirement about dmcontrol behavior when dmcontrol.dmactive==0 HOT 2
- Minor typo + Cannot open PR HOT 2
- Multiple mcontrol6 triggers match on same instruction with different actions and timings HOT 1
- Can tselect be written with an invalid index HOT 2
- Value of tinfo when selected trigger does not exist HOT 2
- Missing state names HOT 1
- Are the vs and vu bits in mcontrol6 dependent on misa.h? HOT 2
- Question about mcontrol6.match and tdata2 HOT 4
- make list of implementation options
- Clarify apparent inconsistency of debug version read by registers
- dcsr.cetrig should be WARL HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from riscv-debug-spec.