AMD support about phaser

[photonstorm]

Do you mean being able to build your game using requireJS/etc, or moving the framework to use modules?

[hlfcoding]

Both would be nice. Having initial AMD support would be more important. I'm not sure how interdependent the Phaser classes are, so splitting into modules may not need to happen, esp. if this is going onto a CDN in the future. Also, I can just require.config() and set a shim for Phaser, which is what I'm doing now, so AMD support isn't required for me, and you can close as seen fit.

[HackManiac]

I'm using the shim way at the moment as well. Having the possibility to load Phaser without the shim workaround would be appreciated, perhaps by using another grunt copy task to wrap the generated JavaScript in an UMD wrapper. No need to convert Phaser to use a module system itself from my side. It works beatifully the way it is now!

[photonstorm]

As it stands now none of the Phaser classes are independent (by design choice), but I could see a need for that once I introduce plugin support. As long as you can actually make a game using AMD your end and it's not blocking you in any way, then I'm happy with that. If someone wants to contribute additional grunt tasks/etc to make workflow easier for you then please do so.

[photonstorm]

This is now resolved in 0.9.4 thanks to HackManiac's updated grunt file.