tc39 / notes Goto Github PK

At the moment, watching the repository produces a lot of notifications.

What would be the best way to follow this repository? Maybe one release per meeting?

For any URL that existed on the web app version of the previous tc39/tc39-notes repository, we’re now redirecting to the Markdown file in the source.

Examples:

• https://tc39.es/notes/ redirects to https://github.com/tc39/notes/tree/master/meetings
• https://tc39.es/notes/2012-05_may-21.html redirects to https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/master/meetings/2012-05/may-21.md
• https://tc39.es/notes/2018-11_summary.html redirects to https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/master/meetings/2018-11/summary.md

We’ve contacted GitHub support asking to set up redirects from https://tc39.github.io/tc39-notes/ (the gh-pages URL for the old repo that was a fork of Rick’s) to https://tc39.github.io/notes/ (the gh-pages URL for new repo). Once that happens, https://tc39.es/tc39-notes/* will redirect to https://tc39.es/notes/*, and so the above redirects will take care of any existing links pointing to the old URLs.

Benefits:

• There’s now a single canonical URL for each day of notes, instead of the previous number of 4 (1 × *.md + 1 × *.html for each repo).
• Pre-existing links continue to work.
• We no longer have to maintain and update the gh-pages branch — instead, we can simply freeze the current version.
• The meeting notes repo is simpler because we no longer need the scripts + deps to create the web site.

Thoughts?

http://tc39.github.io/notes redirects to https://tc39.es/notes, which is a 404

Should we be tracking who delegates are representing? This would help with identifying invited experts, and participating members for role call.

Hi Team

Firstly, thank you so much for publish meeting notes, It's so valuable for catching up current discussion in tc39.
I think it takes almost 1 month between meeting and note publish, so others who wasn't there could not catching up discussion util it published.
I understand it requires long time for editing note in markdown, so I wonder why don't taking minutes over google docs / ether pad etc which can be shared in realtime ? Some working group in IETF utilize ether pad here and it's so helpful.
I don't know who / how taking minutes in meeting but it would be nice if folks could see the minutes earlier even if it's not well formatted.

Thanks

Just wanna know the status is .? And ?? Operator mostly.

In meetings/2023-03/mar-22.md, for the item "Type Annotations Delimiting Concerns", the "Speaker's Summary of Key Points" is the same as that for the previous item "Type Annotations Proposal Update".

(The 'Conclusion' is also the same, though that's perhaps appropriate.)

How about record our meeting and put it to YouTube after our meeting like Node.js does? Live streaming or not is not relevant.

IMHO. I think the video is more approachable than long paragraph of notes and it is a very good material for learning how tc39 works.

I personally would prefer video to text note. Long paragraph of text note is hard for me to read and I cannot associated note with the flow of pdf presentation. I missed last meeting on 8x8. I really hope the meeting video recording will exist.

Node.js youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs-foundation/videos
Nodejs tsc repo's streaming doc: https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/blob/main/Streaming/Streaming-To-Youtube.md

see #281 (review)