Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

the-anti-listserve's Introduction

So there's this site, The Listserve. It's going about a year now. Awesome. Except that it kind of sucks. And it's nowhere near on track to 1m subscribers.

It's a shame because it's such a cool idea. I like this post

My problem with the listserve is that they're taking this incredibly cool idea for something on the internet, and then plugging their ears and pretending they're not on the internet.

The Listserve has been completely static. Stagnant. I can't find a single thing that has changed. They apparently came up with some genius formula before starting, and feel they don't need to ever change it. Which doesn't feel like the place I call the internet.

My sister recently "won" the lotery and got to send an email, so I got to see their rules. Here they are:

What can I send?

  • Text — letters, numbers, symbols
  • No links, images, HTML, Javascript, etc.
  • 600 words max

What can I write?

  • Anything! Well, almost anything... We reserve the right not to send your message if it threatens the spirit of the list — hate speech, etc.
  • If you send something overtly controversial, or (self-) promotional, you must provide your name and email information and why you believe in what you are endorsing — you cannot be anonymous. Spam is unappreciated.

SUGGESTIONS:

  1. Remember, you can write literally anything! But...
  2. The best e-mails are specific.
  3. Don’t sound like a greeting card.
  4. Think about the responses you want from The Listserve community.
  5. Write a draft. Step away. And come back to it.

Wait, there are ruleS? Yeah. Also kind of anti-internet, but hey, there has to be a line somewhere, so ok. But wait wait wait!! If there are rules, why aren't they public??? I can't find them anywhere. Right, they're geniuses who got the formula right before they launched. If their rules are perfect, why post them anywhere public where they might have to engage with critical discussion of them and actually defend them?

These rules affect everyone who subscribes to The Listserve. They should be public.

The rules themselves seem pretty arbitrary.

No links: Ok, some sites are harmful. So screen for those. This is the internet. Or post a public statement of the problem of allowing people to share links, and let people give feedback and offer suggestions and solutions. I can think of a couple. My cynical side wants to say they made this rule because they were worried that people would just post a hundred links to cat photos. Indeed, a lot of early posters instructed readers to google/search youtube for things, since they couldn't link. I desparately hope I'm wrong. I would love to recieve that email.

600 words max: Why? I, again desperately, hope that there is some technical reason for this restriction, or something otherwise definsible. As far as I can tell, from authors referencing the rules, this one has been there from the start, so it doesn't seem to be a response to an issue they encountered or based on any feedback. Maybe there is a technical barrier that forces them to restrict emails to 600 words (uh...). Again, why don't they post about it somewhere public. Get feedback and suggestions. Maybe there's a way around it.

But my cynical side comes up again. Maybe their genius vision was for one digestible email each day for everyone from a random winner. They have some kind of ideal message in mind, and want to steer people into that box.

Well, I don't want emails written from random people who are plunked into boxes first. I want it raw. If someone decides to post their whole thousand-page novel, then clip it at 1000 words and link to the rest. But why would you stop them???

No spam: Why? Give people some credit. And if someone wants to use their lottery winnings on spamming a million people, who are you to stop them?

No anonymity for controversial/promotional stuff: Why??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? ??? ? ? ?

almost anything ... literally anything ... um.

It also really bothers me that the people who are selected are refered to as winners. But that might just be me.

I want a The Listserve that tries to be invisible between me and whoever is sending the message. I want a The Listserve that's not afraid to admit it is a thing on the internet.

the-anti-listserve's People

Contributors

uniphil avatar

Watchers

 avatar James Cloos avatar  avatar

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.