Speed up searching for exclusions about asimov

[FlorianWendelborn]

Also ~/.Trash exclusion would be nice, because even if I have trash excluded in TimeMachine I still have to wait for Asimov to scan through.

Wouldn't it be better to just automatically skip all folders that are excluded from time machine then?

[rowanbeentje]

#18 excludes ~/Library as part of other speedup work - we can add others in the same way I suppose, but I wonder if there's a point where the exclusion checks make the overall process slower than just quickly scanning directories!

[jmarceli]

I was thinking rather about exclusion directly through find, something like (according to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4210042/how-to-exclude-a-directory-in-find-command):

find ~ -type d -name "${parts[0]}" -not -path "/Users/*/Library/*"

I think that this shouldn't hit overall performance (I'm not a find expert so I may be wrong).

Also ~/.Trash exclusion would be nice, because even if I have trash excluded in TimeMachine I still have to wait for Asimov to scan through.

Regarding the speed.
Maybe excluding nested node_modules with find rather than inside the dependency_file_exists() would save some time?
What I mean is:

 find ~ -type d -name "${parts[0]}" -not -path "*/node_modules/*/node_modules*"

[rowanbeentje]

#17 (included in #18 as well!) excludes subdeps, and yeah, that -not -path is the approach used to exclude ~/Library - I just can't help feeling that will have a cost.

(Trashes folders are a great one though)

[jmarceli]

I'm still waiting for ~/.Trash to complete processing (about 20min) despite the fact that I've excluded trash in TM anyway...

The first run of Asimov takes about 2:30 hours, but the overall effect is great.
Thanks for this script.

[muuvmuuv]

Yep, why not exclude everything inside the TimeMaschine ignore list from the find process? I mean the ignore list that you can manually edit in the TimeMaschin pane in settings.