Associate the async service to the TaskExecutor about gs-async-method

[dsyer]

The javadocs you are quoting must be wrong (or the wrong ones) then, right, because the app works and you can tell from the logs that it is using the provided Executor? Where did you find that exactly?

[duntzer]

Yes the app i absolutely working, but I think it is not suitable as an example because it is such a fragile solution.
In this case, the Executor bean is unique in the context and therefore is works, bur if you add a secondary Executor bean for some other reason somewhere in the context, it will stop working and instead revert to the default SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor

[duntzer]

and the javadoc is from here: https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/javadoc-api/org/springframework/scheduling/annotation/EnableAsync.html

[duntzer]

so this is what I'm proposing could be used instead: https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/integration.html#scheduling-annotation-support-qualification

[dsyer]

That makes sense. We could just use the fallback name "taskExecutor". I think I would prefer that, and an explanation of why it's a good idea. Do you want to propose a change?

[duntzer]

ok sounds good, I'll do that!

[dsyer]

Fixed via #13