smoh / kronoskrios

Kronos & Krios 🤘

kronoskrios's Issues

ref for vertical action

scale-length of chemical mixing in molecular clouds

For chemical inhomogeneity, are there any theoretical studies that suggest
a scale-length for chemical mixing? I feel like we need to comment on this,
too -- maybe Eve has an idea? I'm happy to follow up with her on this if it would be useful.

make talk figure

a figure showing abundances of both stars
after subtracting 15 Mearth from \bizarreone and 4 Mearth from \sunanalog

figures and tables

If we want to submit to ApJ Letters, we need to set figures and tables to meet the limit.

1. The total limit on figures and tables is five, so currently there is one too many figures.

Ways I can think of:

• I think the orbit figure doesn't add much to the main discussion, and it's a possibility to quote e.g., max(Z) or Z action in the text. (unless I'm missing some point in which case let me know)
• Combine the two panels to the two panels of posterior (see next comment), so we have 4-panel figure.
• Remove Figure 5, showing how the abundance difference in this binary compares with random pairing/other binaries, and let Figure 4 speak for itself
• Combine Figure 4 and Figure 5 -- I'm opposed to this because I'd like a vs-Tc figure with element name marked cleanly as the "main plot", and marking this in Figure 5 makes the plot even busier
• Remove Figure 3 and only keep vs-Tc plots. I think it is nice to have both as a) Figure 3 clearly shows the data at hand and b) it is a nice transition to Figure 4 from puzzle to solution so to speak.
• Just submit to aas journals

2. The first figure (corner plot) does not meet this:

Multi-panel figures are limited to 9 panels per figure. Multi-panel figures must also be legible on a printed page. Figures that aren't legible must be broken into multiple figures.

and I think it is not necessary to have x,y,z/vx,vy,vz to convey that they are co-spatial/co-moving so I suggest to present PDF of $|\Delta \vec{x}|$ and $|\Delta \vec{v}|$

@adrn , let me know of your thoughts.

Change name again?

To Kronos and Krios, because it's more metal 🤘

TODOs for submission

• vsin(i) uncertainty
• add another sig fig to [X/H] so they match the errors

Paper doesn't make

Missing a figure: yyisofitting.pdf

Also, I would add the aas_macros.sty file to the repo.

things to do

1. Update lithium line figure with Myles fitting.
2. Tweak abstract and attribute Halbwhacs for the pair.
3. abstract: "...higher than its cooler companion"

TODOs for APW

• Could you check two TODO: APW items in the manuscript?
• Could you also check whether everything makes sense for dxdv and orbit plot and edit accordingly? (Gala citation etc.)
• Do you know a reference for vertical action as age indicator?
• Difference in posterior sample is posterior sample of difference, is it not?
• I cannot get natbib citation of Myles+2017 in prep to appear properly as "Myles et al. 2017, in prep.".

Some wordings I changed:

• You say "median posterior sample" which I changed to "median of the posterior sample". Sample is a set ${x_i}$ of numbers for variable $x$, and I understood it as you took the median value (a scalar) of this set for each variable (x,y,z,vx,vy,vz).

make bibcodes easier to recognize in tex