Nao_gazebo_plugin_H25.launch doesn't run correctly. about nao_virtual

[mikaelarguedas]

It seems that the namespace has been removed in the last version. It will be fixed in nao_description soon, in the meantime you can just remove the namespace in naoGazebo.xacro.

[vrabaud]

@keulYSMB , what do I need to do here ? Do I need to make a new release of something ?

[mikaelarguedas]

@vrabaud, I'm waiting for feedback from @nlyubova to either remove the
namespace from everywhere or getting back to the previous working version
with "nao_dcm" namespace everywhere.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vincent Rabaud [email protected]
wrote:

@keulYSMB https://github.com/keulYSMB , what do I need to do here ? Do
I need to make a new release of something ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#11 (comment)
.

[nlyubova]

Yes, it's better to remove. For me it works like it's now. What should I
check/ remove else exactly ?
On Nov 16, 2015 2:09 PM, "Arguedas Mikael" [email protected] wrote:

@vrabaud, I'm waiting for feedback from @nlyubova to either remove the
namespace from everywhere or getting back to the previous working version
with "nao_dcm" namespace everywhere.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vincent Rabaud [email protected]
wrote:

@keulYSMB https://github.com/keulYSMB , what do I need to do here ? Do
I need to make a new release of something ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/ros-naoqi/nao_virtual/issues/11#issuecomment-156808991>
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#11 (comment)
.

[mikaelarguedas]

@nlyubova Can you help me for the testing part ? I don't have access to any
real NAO and I would like to be sure that by fixing the gazebo package we
dont endup breaking something running on the real robot.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Natalia Lyubova [email protected]
wrote:

Yes, it's better to remove. For me it works like it's now. What should I
check/ remove else exactly ?
On Nov 16, 2015 2:09 PM, "Arguedas Mikael" [email protected]
wrote:

@vrabaud, I'm waiting for feedback from @nlyubova to either remove the
namespace from everywhere or getting back to the previous working version
with "nao_dcm" namespace everywhere.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Vincent Rabaud <
[email protected]>
wrote:

@keulYSMB https://github.com/keulYSMB , what do I need to do here ?
Do
I need to make a new release of something ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<

https://github.com/ros-naoqi/nao_virtual/issues/11#issuecomment-156808991>

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/ros-naoqi/nao_virtual/issues/11#issuecomment-157023797>

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#11 (comment)
.

[nlyubova]

Yes sure, What exactly should I test?

[zhudelong]

I got even more problems like:

[ INFO] [1448280160.397253365]: Camera Plugin (robotNamespace = /nao_robot), Info: Using the 'robotNamespace' param: '/nao_robot'
[ WARN] [1448280160.397327749]: gazebo_ros_camera_ simulation does not support non-zero distortion parameters right now, your simulation maybe wrong.

[ INFO] [1448280161.321264566]: gazebo_ros_control plugin is waiting for model URDF in parameter [/robot_description] on the ROS param server.
[ INFO] [1448280161.514766100]: Loaded gazebo_ros_control.
[WARN] [WallTime: 1448280188.828739] [0.000000] Controller Spawner couldn't find the expected controller_manager ROS interface.

I try to remove namespace but still not work. Anyone have an idea? thank you very much

[mikaelarguedas]

This is not an error that you should try to solve. We provide complete
models for the cameras, but this version of gazebo doesn't handle advances
camera models and thus does't simulate distortion.
This message is just a warnong to let you know that distortion won't be
simulated.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:08 PM, zhudelong [email protected] wrote:

I got even more problems like:

[ INFO] [1448280160.397253365]: Camera Plugin (robotNamespace =
/nao_robot), Info: Using the 'robotNamespace' param: '/nao_robot'
[ WARN] [1448280160.397327749]: gazebo_ros_camera_ simulation does not
support non-zero distortion parameters right now, your simulation maybe
wrong.
[ INFO] [1448280160.398905232]: Camera Plugin (robotNamespace =
/nao_robot), Info: Using the 'robotNamespace' param: '/nao_robot'
[ WARN] [1448280160.398950005]: gazebo_ros_camera_ simulation does not
support non-zero distortion parameters right now, your simulation maybe
wrong.

I try to remove namespace but still not work. Anyone have an idea? thank
you very much

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#11 (comment)
.

[mikaelarguedas]

@nlyubova can you test the branch fixControllers ?
Ideally I would like you to test it in a new workspace:

1. launch roslaunch nao_gazebo_plugin nao_gazebo_plugin_H25.launch
2. launch nao_dcm

I'm surprised the moveit package does not seem to be working anymore. any idea about that ? have you try it in a new setup since your changes ?

[mikaelarguedas]

BTW this should fix #12 once we figure out what's going on the moveit side

[mikaelarguedas]

I tried the new controllers on the gazebo package and they seem to be launched properly and to receive commands sent by rostopic pub. Could anyone test it on a real robot ?

[mikaelarguedas]

no need to rename controllers. bug fixed in ros-naoqi/nao_robot@f8eeae0
Tested on real and gazebo simulated robot