SiteWhere is an industrial-strength open source IoT Application Enablement Platform that facilitates the ingestion, storage, processing, and integration of device data at massive scale. The platform has been designed from the ground up to take advantage of the latest technologies in order to scale efficiently to the loads expected in large IoT projects.
SiteWhere embraces a completely distributed architecture using Kubernetes as the infrastructure and a variety of microservices to build out the system. This approach allows customization and scaling at a fine-grained level so that the system may be tailored to many potential IoT use cases. SiteWhere is built with a framework approach using clearly defined APIs so that new technologies may easily be integrated as the IoT ecosystem evolves.
SiteWhere is composed of Java-based microservices which are built as Docker images and deployed to Kubernetes for orchestration. To simplify deployement, Helm is used to provide standard templates for various deployment scenarios. Helm charts are provided which supply all of the dependencies needed to run a complete SiteWhere instance, including both the microservices and infrastructure components such as Apache Zookeeper, Kafka, Mosquitto MQTT broker, and other supporting technologies.
SiteWhere 2.0 introduces a much different architectural approach than was used in the 1.x platform. While the core APIs are mostly unchanged, the system implementation has moved from a monolithic structure to one based on microservices. This approach provides a number of advantages over the previous architecture.
Each microservice is a completely self-contained entity that has its own configuration schema, internal components, data persistence, and interactions with the event processing pipeline. SiteWhere microservices are built on top of a custom microservice framework and run as separate Spring Boot processes, each contained in its own Docker image.
Separating the system logic into microservices allows the interactions between various areas of the system to be more clearly defined. This transition has resulted in a more understandable and maintainable system and should continue to pay dividends as more features are added.
The microservice architecture allows individual functional areas of the system to be scaled independently or left out completely. In use cases where REST processing tends to be a bottleneck, multiple REST microservices can be run concurrently to handle the load. Conversely, services such as presence management that may not be required can be left out so that processing power can be dedicated to other aspects of the system.
The 2.0 architecture introduces the concept of a SiteWhere instance, which allows the distributed system to act as a cohesive unit with some aspects addressed at the global level. All of the microservices for a single SiteWhere instance must be running on the same Kubernetes infrastucture, though the system may be spread across tens or hundreds of machines to distribute the processing load.
SiteWhere 2.0 moves system configuration from the filesystem into Apache ZooKeeper to allow for a centralized approach to configuration management. ZooKeeper contains a hierarchical structure which represents the configuration for one or more SiteWhere instances and all of the microservices that are used to realize them.
Each microservice has a direct connection to ZooKeeper and uses the hierarchy to determine its configuration at runtime. Microservices listen for changes to the configuration data and react dynamically to updates. No configuration is stored locally within the microservice, which prevents problems with keeping services in sync as system configuration is updated.
Since many of the system components such as Zookeeper, Kafka, and various databases require access to persistent storage, SiteWhere 2.0 uses Rook.io within Kubernetes to supply distributed, replicated block storage that is resilient to hardware failures while still offering good performance characteristics. As storage and throughput needs increase over time, new storage devices can be made available dynamically. The underlying Ceph architecture used by Rook.io can handle exobytes of data while allowing data to be resilient to failures at the node, rack, or even datacenter level.
With the dynamic nature of the microservices architecture, it is imporant for microservices to be able to efficiently locate running instances of the various other services they interact with. SiteWhere 2.0 leverages Consul for service discovery. Each microservice registers with Consul and provides a steady stream of updates to the (potentially replicated) central store. As instances of microservices are added or removed, SiteWhere dynamically adjusts connectivity to take advantage of the available resources.
The event processing pipeline in SiteWhere 2.0 has been completely redesigned and uses Apache Kafka to provide a resilient, high-performance mechanism for progressively processing device event data. Microservices can plug in to key points in the event processing pipeline, reading data from well-known inbound topics, processing data, then sending data to well-known outbound topics. External entites that are interested in data at any point in the pipeline can act as consumers of the SiteWhere topics to use the data as it moves through the system.
In the SiteWhere 1.x architecture, the pipeline for outbound processing used a blocking approach which meant that any single outbound processor could block the outbound pipeline. In SiteWhere 2.0, each outbound connector is a true Kafka consumer with its own offset marker into the event stream. This mechanism allows for outbound processors to process data at their own pace without slowing down other processors. It also allows services to leverage Kafka's consumer groups to distribute load across multiple consumers and scale processing accordingly.
Using Kafka also has other advantages that are leveraged by SiteWhere. Since all data for the distributed log is stored on disk, it is possible to "replay" the event stream based on previously gathered data. This is extremely valuable for aspects such as debugging processing logic or load testing the system.
While device event data generally flows in a pipeline from microservice to microservice on Kafka topics, there are also API operations that need to occur in real time between the microservices. For instance, device management and event management functions are contained in separate microservices, so as new events come in to the system, the inbound processing microservice needs to interact with device management to look up existing devices in the system and event management in order to persist the events to a datastore such as Apache Cassandra.
Rather than solely using REST services based on HTTP 1.x, which tend to have significant connection overhead, SiteWhere 2.0 uses gRPC to establish a long-lived connection between microservices that need to communicate with each other. Since gRPC uses persistent HTTP2 connections, the overhead for interactions is greatly reduced, allowing for decoupling without a significant performance penalty.
The entire SiteWhere data model has been captured in Google Protocol Buffers format so that it can be used within GRPC services. All of the SiteWhere APIs are now exposed directly as gRPC services as well, allowing for high-performance, low-latency access to what was previously only accessible via REST. The REST APIs are still made available via the Web/REST microservice, but they use the gRPC APIs underneath to provide a consistent approach to accessing data.
Since the number of instances of a given microservice can change over time as the service is scaled up or down, SiteWhere automatically handles the process of connecting/disconnecting the gRPC pipes between microservices. Each outbound gRPC client is demulitplexed across the pool of services that can satisfy the requests, allowing the requests to be processed in parallel.
The SiteWhere 1.x approach to multitenancy was to use a separate "tenant engine" for each tenant. The engine supported all tenant-specific tasks such as data persistence, event processing, etc. Since SiteWhere 2.0 has moved to a microservices architecture, the multitenant model has been distributed as well. SiteWhere supports two types of microservices: global and multitenant.
Global microservices do not handle tenant-specific tasks. These services handle aspects such as instance-wide user management and tenant management that are not specific to individual system tenants. The Web/REST microservice that supports the REST services and Swagger user interface is also a global service, since supporting a separate web container for each tenant would be cumbersome and would break existing SiteWhere 1.x applications. There is also a global instance management microservice that monitors various aspects of the entire instance and reports updates to the individual microservces via Kafka.
Most of the SiteWhere 2.0 services are multitenant microservices which delegate traffic to tenant engines that do the actual processing. For instance, the inbound processing microservice actually consists of many inbound processing tenant engines, each of which is configured separately and can be started/stopped/reconfigured without affecting the other tenant engines.
The new approach to tenant engines changes the dynamics of SiteWhere event processing. It is now possible to stop a single tenant engine without the need for stopping tenant engines running in other microservices. For instance, inbound processing for a tenant can be stopped and reconfigured while the rest of the tenant pipeline continues processing. Since new events can be allowed to stack up in Kafka, the tenant engine can be stopped, reconfigured, and restarted, then resume where it left off with no data loss.
Copyright (c) 2009-2018 SiteWhere LLC. All rights reserved.
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent