Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

pointfreeco / combine-schedulers Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW
687.0 687.0 92.0 432 KB

⏰ A few schedulers that make working with Combine more testable and more versatile.

Home Page: https://www.pointfree.co

License: MIT License

Swift 99.05% Makefile 0.95%
combine-framework testing

combine-schedulers's Issues

Simulate the inaccuracy of schedulers

This is a fantastic library and aids testing of time based asynchrony really well. But in a way, it only simulates the happiest path due to the precision of the scheduler. As we all know, when a timer is set it will complete at a point of timer after the scheduled time, if only a fraction of a second after. In your videos on Clocks, you demonstrate how this drift can add relatively quickly.

Would it be possible to add a feature where we can test against these small inaccuracies? So after advancing the scheduler, rather than the schedulers' .now property being set exactly to the next scheduled actions date, it could be set with a defined drift, maybe even the .minimumTolerance. This way, if we need to, we can test against these small inaccuracies of timing that can add up after many events.

iOS 13 EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION

Describe the bug
This problem is only related to iOS 13 (on iOS 14 and 15 everything is working fine) and maybe it's a bug in Combine itself. When the crash is happening action is still performed on the main thread (check screenshot section).

To Reproduce
Actually hard to reproduce, in the case of our project it happens in tree cases (maybe more but we just don't figure out every one of them yet):

  1. When performing observing of outputVolume:
  // ...

  extension Publisher where Failure == Never {
    @inlinable
    public func sinkValues(_ valueReceiver: @escaping (Output) -> Void) -> AnyCancellable {
      return sink(receiveValue: valueReceiver)
    }
  }	

  // ...	

  // this code is called from application(_:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions)
  try? AVAudioSession.sharedInstance().setCategory(.playback)
  AVAudioSession.sharedInstance().publisher(for: \.outputVolume)
    .receive(on: UIScheduler.shared) // crash happening here
    .sinkValues { _ in
      EduDoVideoPlayerPreferenceProvider.global.isMuted = false
    }
    .store(in: &soundManagerSubscriptions)
  1. Force unwrapping dequeued cell, that contains the view that does this:
  private func observeState() {
    $state
      .receive(on: UIScheduler.shared) // crash happening here
      .sinkValues { [weak self] state in self?.configureView(using: state) })
      .store(in: &subscriptions)
  }
  1. Observing composable state changes using .receive(on: UIScheduler.shared). This happens not every time, sometimes it works fine and sometimes it crashes.

Can't share all code due to NDA.

In all cases, the error is the same.

Expected behavior
App is not crashing 😓.

Screenshots
Reversed stack trace screenshots.

Breakpoint prints the result of Thread.isMainThread and when it crashes it's still the main thread.
photo_2021-09-29 13 40 44

photo_2021-09-29 13 40 48

photo_2021-09-29 13 40 57

Environment

  • Xcode 12.5.1
  • Swift 5.4.2
  • iOS 13

Compatibility with M1 macbook (arm64)

Describe the bug
I cannot build the tests on an M1 macbook. It seems to work fine on intel machine.

The issue is that if I start with a clean project I get No such module CombineSchedulers in IDE where the import CombineSchedulers is and when building my tests - under Compile Swift Source Files (arm64) I also get the error No such module CombineSchedulers.

If I build my app target first, the errors in IDE disappears. But then I proceed to building my tests and I get No such module MYMODULE under Compile Swift Source Files (arm64).

Expected behavior
Test target should build and run tests.

Environment

  • Xcode 12.3
  • Swift 5.0

Any way to convert AnySchedulerOf<RunLoop> back to RunLoop?

Describe the bug
Not a bug
Hi guys, I'm using CADisplayLink in my project and want to inject AnyScheduler to test the behavior. However, CADisplayLink takes in RunLoop instead of Scheduler as a parameter to add(to:,forMode:) method.
So I cannot use AnySchedulerOf that I injected.

Is there a way to convert RunLoop.main.eraseToAnyScheduler() back to RunLoop type? Is it possible?

To Reproduce

// And/or enter code that reproduces the behavior here.
private let mainLoop: AnySchedulerOf<RunLoop>

let displayLink = CADisplayLink(target: self, selector: #selector(update))
displayLink.add(to: self.mainLoop, forMode: .default) // <- Error Above

Expected behavior

Screenshots
Screen Shot 2021-09-07 at 12 32 11 PM

Environment

  • Xcode 12.5.1
  • Swift 5.3
  • OS (if applicable): [e.g. iOS 13]

Additional context
Add any more context about the problem here.

Subscriber does not receive values when `.subscribe(on: scheduler).receive(on: scheduler)` used with the TestScheduler

Describe the bug

I looks like there is an issue where a subscriber does not receive values when test scheduler is used in combination with subscribe(on:) and receive(on:) operators.

To Reproduce

    @MainActor func test_stuck() async {
        let subject = PassthroughSubject<Int, Never>()
        let scheduler = DispatchQueue.test
        var values: [Int] = []
        
        let cancelable = subject
            .subscribe(on: scheduler)
            .receive(on: scheduler)
            .map { $0 * $0 }
            .receive(on: scheduler)
            .sink { value in values.append(value) }
        
        let valuesToSend = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
        
        for value in valuesToSend {
            subject.send(value)
        }
        await scheduler.run()
        XCTAssertEqual(values, [0, 1, 4, 9, 16])
    }

Expected behavior
The above test should pass

Screenshots
N/A

Environment

  • Xcode 13.4.1
  • Swift 5.6.1

ImmediateScheduler not returning immediately with debounce

Describe the bug
I am trying to use ImmediateScheduler to avoid using XCTWaiter to wait for a given debounce to finish. However, when I pass in a immediate scheduler to debounce() the value assigned by the subscriber is not set before the assertion happens. It won't even work if I add _ = XCTWaiter.wait(for: [XCTestExpectation()], timeout: 5) even though the debounce is only for 0.5 seconds.

The test succeeds if I use DispatchQueue.main and wait for 0.5 seconds. It might just be me understanding the functionality of purposes for ImmediateScheduler

// I am passing in a scheduler variable normally instead of hardcoding, just for demonstration purposes.
usernameState
            .debounce(for: 0.5, scheduler: DispatchQueue.immediateScheduler)
            .receive(on: DispatchQueue.immediateScheduler)
            .map { $0.message }
            .assign(to: \.usernameError, on: self)
            .store(in: &cancellables)

// Test:
func testUsernameErrorMessage() throws {
        var usernameError = ""
        
        viewModel.$usernameError
            .sink(receiveValue: { usernameError = $0 })
            .store(in: &cancellables)

        // Empty state
        viewModel.username = ""
        XCTAssertEqual(usernameError, "my error message")
}

Expected behavior
I expected the publisher to return the value immediately instead of having to wait, however it won't even work with an ImmediateScheduler if I add XCTWaiter.

Environment

  • Xcode 12 beta 6
  • Swift 5.3
  • OS (if applicable): iOS 14

cocoapods spec not found

Describe the bug
cocoapods spec is missing when running pod install

[!] Unable to find a specification for `CombineSchedulers`

To Reproduce
run pod repo update or pod install --repo-update, then do a pod search CombineSchedulers, you will see:

[!] Unable to find a pod with name, author, summary, or description matching `CombineSchedulers`

Expected behavior
CombineSchedulers should be searchable in pod repo, and pod install should not fail if include pod CombineSchedulers.

Environment

  • Xcode [e.g. 14.3]
  • Swift [e.g. 5.5]
  • OS (if applicable): [e.g. iOS 16]

Cannot find Publishers

I am using Xcode 14.1, minimum deployments iOS 15.5. added CombineSchedulers via SPM, and import CombineSchedulers in my swift file.

But when I am using Publishers.Timer(every: .second(1), scheduler: scheduler) API, I am getting Xcode error saying Cannot find Publishers in scope.

Is there anything I missed from the documentation? Thanks in advance for your help.

When compiled with library evolution turned on, the resulting .swiftinterface file is not compiling.

Describe the bug

This is probably a Swift compiler limitation/bug, which can be easily overcome with a simple workaround - see below.

To Reproduce

To compile with library evolution, you use the following command line:

xcrun xcodebuild -workspace "./.swiftpm/xcode/package.xcworkspace" -scheme "combine-schedulers" -configuration Debug -destination "generic/platform=iOS Simulator" -sdk iphonesimulator BUILD_LIBRARY_FOR_DISTRIBUTION=YES SKIP_INSTALL=NO CLANG_ENABLE_CODE_COVERAGE=NO GCC_INSTRUMENT_PROGRAM_FLOW_ARCS=NO SWIFT_SERIALIZE_DEBUGGING_OPTIONS=NO "OTHER_SWIFT_FLAGS=-Xfrontend -no-serialize-debugging-options"

You can then inspect the resulting .swiftinterface file by looking in the PRODUCTS folder, in CombineSchedulers.swiftmodule

There you will see files like arm64-apple-ios-simulator.swiftinterface or x86_64-apple-ios-simulator.swiftinterface

The gist of the problem is the following line (235) in the file Timer.swift:

public func receive<S: Subscriber>(subscriber: S)
      where Failure == S.Failure, Output == S.Input {

The compiler gets confused because the generic parameter 'S' in the receive function has the same name as the generic parameter 'S' in
public final class Timer<S: Scheduler>: ConnectablePublisher
(see line 83)

The Swift compiler gets confused because inside the .swiftinterface file nested types get fully qualified, so for receive you will get something like this:

    final public func receive<S>(subscriber: S) where S : Combine.Subscriber, S.SchedulerTimeType == S.Input, S.Failure == Swift.Never

And this is definitely confusing for the compiler.

The way to fix it is to rename the parameter 'S' in the receive to something else, e.g. 'SC':

public func receive<SC: Subscriber>(subscriber: SC)
      where Failure == SC.Failure, Output == SC.Input 

In that case the resulting .swiftinterface will get this:

final public func receive<SC>(subscriber: SC) where SC : Combine.Subscriber, S.SchedulerTimeType == SC.Input, SC.Failure == Swift.Never

Since it's a very easy fix, I would greatly appreciate if it's done in a following minor/patch release.

Release builds can't find XCTFail

Describe the bug
This has 0.1.0 of xctest-dynamic-overlay as a dependency. Release builds can now fail with the following error

Cannot find 'XCTFail' in scope

The version for xctest-dynamic-overlay should probably be updated to >= 0.2 since 0.1 doesn't define XCTFail in release builds and FailableScheduler now exists in release builds.

To Reproduce
Build the repo using version 0.1.0 of xctest-dynamic-overlay. Easiest way I know to reproduce it is with the following with will use the version in the Package.resolved.

swift build --disable-automatic-resolution --configuration release

Expected behavior
It should build

Environment

  • Xcode 12.5.1
  • Swift 5.4

EXC_BAD_ACCESS crash with iOS 15.2

Describe the bug
When adding a type erased dispatch queue to my composable architecture environment, I found a run time error that occurs when the queue is erased to AnyScheduler. The code builds successfully, but as soon as it tries to load the app, it crashes, pointing to the "eraseToAnyScheduler()" call. This also occurs if I try to type erase locally with a labeled queue.

To Reproduce
schedularTest.zip

public struct HomeEnvironment {
  public var mainQueue: AnySchedulerOf<DispatchQueue>

  public init(
    mainQueue: AnySchedulerOf<DispatchQueue>
  ) {
    self.mainQueue = mainQueue
  }
}

@main
struct schedularTestApp: App {
  var body: some Scene {
    WindowGroup {
      ContentView(
        store: .init(
          initialState: HomeState(),
          reducer: homeReducer,
          environment: HomeEnvironment(mainQueue: .main)
        )
      )
    }
  }
}

Expected behavior
Scheduler is successfully erased and the app doesn't crash 🥲

Screenshots
image

Environment

  • Xcode 13.2
  • Swift 5
  • OS: iOS 15.2

Additional context
This bug was initially found when the preview would crash with no feedback. I then built out a specific preview target to try and run on the simulator. This also crashed, but gave me a stack trace that pointed to the erasing of the scheduler. Because my project was pretty intense, I created a new small test project to see if it was my project or the framework (see zipped project). Even in just this small app that only imports the latest release of the composable architecture, the bug still persists. I then tested on a device, and the bug was not there. My device was running iOS 15.1. I downloaded the 15.0 simulators and those do not have this bug either. It only appears to occur with iOS 15.2.

Install using Carthage

Currently this can only be installed with SPM, it'd be nice if it could be installed with Carthage as well.

Would that be a PR you'd be willing to accept? I was thinking it could be done in a similar way to how swift-snapshot-testing does it (with xcodegen creating the project).

Can't get version 0.7.0 compile on Xcode 14 beta 1

Describe the bug
Thank you for the concurrency work!

Hoever I got a compile error when try to use latest TCA package 0.39.0, which depends on this package at version 0.7.0.

AnyScheduler.swift:333:48: error build: Protocol type with type arguments can only be used as a generic constraint

To Reproduce
Download the package, and compile.

Expected behavior
It should compile.

Screenshots
image

Environment

  • Xcode 14.0 beta 1
  • Swift 5.7
  • OS iOS 16 beta(simulator)
  • macOS 12.4 Monterey

Cannot archive build on Xcode 13 beta 3

Describe the bug

When running archive build on Xcode 13 beta 3, the build fail since it depends on Combine.framework built by different compiler version.

Failed to build module 'Combine'; this SDK is not supported by the compiler (the SDK is built with 'Apple Swift version 5.5 (swiftlang-1300.0.24.14 clang-1300.0.25.10)', while this compiler is 'Apple Swift version 5.5 (swiftlang-1300.0.24.13 clang-1300.0.25.10)'). Please select a toolchain which matches the SDK.

Screenshots
Screen Shot 2021-07-15 at 13 36 50

Environment

  • Xcode 13 beta 3
  • Swift 5.5

UIScheduler SchedulerOptions type?

Why does the UIScheduler have public typealias SchedulerOptions = Never? It does not seem to fit to an API with AnySchedulerOf<DispatchQueue> because the SchedulerOptions types do not match. Or am I supposed to use AnySchedulerOf<UIScheduler> for the API type if I want to also enable use of test scheduler? But then I can not replace the UIScheduler with DispatchQueue.main.

I'm just wondering this because in ReactiveSwift the UIScheduler conforms to their own Scheduler protocol (immediate scheduling only) and DispatchQueue conforms to DateScheduler: Scheduler protocol (can schedule to the future). So if the API defines var scheduler: Scheduler both UIScheduler and DispatchQueue.main can be used.

I'm not even sure if there is any use case to actually replace UIScheduler with plain DispatchQueue. I was just used to writing this kind of API 😅

Build documentation on Xcode14b5 for projects including `CombineSchedulers` fail

Describe the bug
Only as a heads up, when trying to build documentation on Use Xcode14 beta 5 fails with not found symbol identifiers.

To Reproduce
Use Xcode14 beta 5 with a project that has the CombineSchedulers dependency and run "Build Documentation" from the Product menu

Expected behavior
Documentation builds and DocC is exportable

Screenshots
Screenshot 2022-08-15 at 11 29 09

Environment

  • Xcode 14.0 beta 5
  • Swift 5.7

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.