planck-npipe / hillipop Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWA cobaya high-ell likelihood polarized for planck 2020 data (NPIPE release)
License: GNU General Public License v3.0
A cobaya high-ell likelihood polarized for planck 2020 data (NPIPE release)
License: GNU General Public License v3.0
Hi all,
I am wondering how this python/cobaya implementation of hillipop
compares with previously published results. I had a look at https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09730, which quotes a chi2 of 9995.9 (with fewer degrees of freedom that the implementation in this repo, I guess at some point something changed).
When I use cobaya's minimizer with the TT component of this likelihood, I find a best-fit
weight minuslogpost theta_s_1e2 logA ns omega_b omega_cdm tau A_planck cal100A cal100B cal143B cal217A cal217B Aradio Adusty AdustTT Asz Acib Aksz Aszxcib H0 sigma8 minuslogprior minuslogprior__0 chi2 chi2__planck_2020_hillipop.TT
1 5698.4544 1.0417533 3.0456148 0.96222611 0.022164104 0.12010398 0.056121184 0.99974758 -6.3060996e-05 0.0027286476 -0.0014550786 0.00017878047 0.00018272773 1.6739364 0.78062506 0.8803056 1.2316963 0.7894615 3.3306691e-16 1.6577574 67.601084 0.82496051 -44.766851 -44.766851 11486.442 11486.442
The minimum chi2 of 11486.442 seems quite a bit higher than that reported in 1609.09730 (even when normalized to # d.o.f.). Any ideas as to where the discrepancy comes from? Is there a more up-to-date reference for best-fit/etc. with hillipop
that I should be looking at?
(For the theory code I am using CLASS v3.0 rather than CAMB, but I don't expect this to affect the situation dramatically.)
Cheers,
Alex
We are trying to use the hillipop likelihood in Cobaya however with a modified CLASS version as opposed to CAMB as in the example in this repository. The computation simply stops with
[planck_2020_hillipop.ttteee] Computing new state
[planck_2020_hillipop.ttteee] *ERROR* The 'theory' attribute of likelihoods has been deprecated. Please use the equivalent 'provider' attribute instead.
We believe the theory module is running without a problem since it is outputting the correct things and the sampling just crashes at the first evaluation of hillipop
. However we are not able to get past the above issue. I am unsure it has to do with the deprecation above or something else. Is there a way to solve this or at least get some more information via a debugging option?
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.