otalk / getscreenmedia Goto Github PK

I'd like to fork this in order to use this at work, but I need to have a license attached. Could you add a license? Probably the same that the other SimpleWebRTC stuff is under?

when https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=983504 lands

I don't understand this commit: 437f302

It has disabled support for screen sharing for Chrome >= 34, but, if I modify this (changing the condition if (chromever >= 26 && chromever <= 33) to be if (chromever >= 26 && chromever <= 35) it's working great, even on Chrome 34 (as long as you have enabled the correct flag).

I am having problem uploading my extension .zip folder.
I m getting error:

Sub-package must be signed
Error: Add-ons which contain sub-packages must have all sub-packages signed before uploading.

I just zip all 3 files in folder instal.rdf, bootstap.js, screenshare.xpi.

I want to run a headless browser on the server within my Rails app. I want so share that browser's session with a web page in my app that users access through an iFrame in another web page in my app.

So for example:

• If a user clicked on a button in that iFrame, then the headless browser would click on the corresponding button in its browsing session.
• If the page updated within the headless browser's session, then the page within the iFrame would update in the same way.

I'm wondering if I might be able to achieve this using this. However, I'm guessing this would involve me embarking on a lengthy process of development, so before I dig too far into this potential rabbit warren, can I ask: is something like this even possible?

Nowhere in the docs do I see the fact that the site that is doing the screensharing must provide its own extension for users to install. This additionally makes the extension examples more confusing because w/o that assumption it's very hard to tell what they're even supposed to be.

@legastero noticed that 1.0.x silently fails in opera. Probably need to match against user agent

Hi!

I've just noticed that a lot of repos don't git tag their releases in npm, it is on purpose?

I'm getting the warning below when I install getscreenmedia.

warning "[email protected]" has unmet peer dependency "webrtc-adapter@^3.1.6".

Now that v4 removed inclusion of adapter should it not be also removed from package.json?

PERMISSION_DENIED error needs to be renamed to PermissionDeniedError (I think)
Version bump.

From Firefox 53 onwards, no new legacy add-ons will be accepted on addons.mozilla.org (AMO).

From Firefox 57 onwards, WebExtensions will be the only supported extension type, and Firefox will not load other types.

It should instead try to use the "old Chrome style" to get screen media. The regex check of Chrome version makes the code execute the same way for CEF and Chrome, when their APIs actually differ.

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/52.0a2/auroranotes/

🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉

Hiya
I'm trying this one out connected to a server running "simplewebrtc"
but when ever I click the button for sharing screen I'm getting this error message

Error in event handler for (unknown): TypeError: Cannot read property 'sourceId' of undefined

what am I missing here, I've never built a chrome extension before

I'm in Opera 30 and running this function ends in a black hole. The callback never fires.