Review roles and signup about sig-docs-community

[paucom]

Content reviewer - Reviewer familiar with our writing style and users, who works in an editorial capacity with the original author to make structural and organizational improvements. The content reviewer helps to make content useful and to meet our style baseline. Responds to documentation PRs with high-level content suggestions.

[sptramer]

Technical reviewer - Reviewer familiar with (parts of) Open 3D Engine, who doesn't need to have strong writing skills - only strong technical skills. The technical reviewer makes sure that content is accurate and provides additional context where writers need it to serve the user.

[paucom]

Copyeditor - Reviewer very familiar with our writing style. Focuses on line-level copy edits rather than high-level developmental edits. Works to enforce style guidelines and consistency across all our documentation. The copyeditor focuses only on end-stage reviews; they don't review every documentation PR.

[paucom]

Be a representative. When you're conducting a review, you're representing the Open 3D Engine project. Follow good etiquette and the Code of Conduct, and try to act in good faith.

Be respectful. Respond kindly in reviews. Make it clear that suggestions are suggestions, unless they're violations of the Code of Conduct, project values, or style guide.

Be available. Rotation lengths are determined by how many people are available on the reviewer list and we'll work to keep them as brief but contiguous as possible, but be prepared to make a time commitment during yours. We have no SLA, but want to keep contributions from going stale.

[sptramer]

Closing out as we've defined the roles and responsibilities, and further signup will be done through any SIG process. This thread will become part of a reviewer roles doc.