noriste / bitcoin-address-soft-regex-validation

A single-function package to perform soft (no checksum) bitcoin address (Base58 and Bech32) validation

I'm a passionate JavaScript engineer, currently focused on React and TypeScript. I love creating high-quality products, learning and sharing my knowledge, helping people, speaking at conferences, and facing new challenges.

• 🗣 Did you attend a talk of mine? You can find the slides on slides.com/noriste
• 📋 Did you read an article of mine? You can find all of them on Medium or dev.to
• 📖 Check out my UI Tesing Best Practices book
• 👨‍🏫 Are you looking for a Cypress course? Reach me at [email protected]

A list of all my articles, courses, packages, etc. is available on my my-contributions repository. You can find me on Twitter for everything else ❤️

bitcoin-address-soft-regex-validation's Issues

Dependency Dashboard

This issue lists Renovate updates and detected dependencies. Read the Dependency Dashboard docs to learn more.

Edited/Blocked

These updates have been manually edited so Renovate will no longer make changes. To discard all commits and start over, click on a checkbox.

• Update dependency coveralls to v3.1.1
• Update stryker-js monorepo to v4.6.0 (@stryker-mutator/core, @stryker-mutator/jest-runner)

Open

These updates have all been created already. Click a checkbox below to force a retry/rebase of any.

• Update dependency jest to v29
• Update stryker-js monorepo to v7 (major) (@stryker-mutator/core, @stryker-mutator/jest-runner)

Detected dependencies

npm

package.json

• @stryker-mutator/core 4.1.2
• @stryker-mutator/html-reporter 3.1.0
• @stryker-mutator/javascript-mutator 4.0.0
• @stryker-mutator/jest-runner 4.1.2
• coveralls 3.1.0
• jest 26.6.3

travis

.travis.yml

---

• Check this box to trigger a request for Renovate to run again on this repository

Use of mutation testing in bitcoin-address-soft-regex-validation - Help needed

Hello there!

My name is Ana. I noted that you use the mutation testing tool StrykerJS in the project.
I am a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Seville (Spain), and my colleagues and I are studying how mutation testing tools are used in practice. With this aim in mind, we have analysed over 3,500 public GitHub repositories using mutation testing tools, including yours! This work has recently been published in a journal paper available at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10664-022-10177-8.pdf.

To complete this study, we are asking for your help to understand better how mutation testing is used in practice, please! We would be extremely grateful if you could contribute to this study by answering a brief survey of 21 simple questions (no more than 6 minutes). This is the link to the questionnaire https://forms.gle/FvXNrimWAsJYC1zB9 .

We apologize if you have already received message multiple times or if you have already had the opportunity to complete the survey. If you have already shared your feedback, we want to convey our appreciation, kindly disregard this message, and please accept our apologies for any inconvenience.

Drop me an e-mail if you have any questions or comments ([email protected]). Thank you very much in advance!!

Add myself as contributor

@all-contributors please add @NoriSte for code and tests