newsdev / docker-rails Goto Github PK

Otherwise we can't use any of the asset_path family of url helpers in any sort of *.erb asset files. They generate different files depending on Rails environment and so staging deploys will never be able to find those assets.

For repositories with Dockerfiles that we publish on Docker Hub, it could be helpful to use the same repository name on both websites. When looking at one of our repos that uses newsdev/rails as a base, my first instinct is to look for that Dockerfile at github.com/newsdev/rails.

While it's certainly worth it to learn about Docker Hub so we all understand where to look for non-NYT Dockerfiles, it might reduce confusion if we either:

• renamed this repo newsdev/rails, or
• renamed the docker hub repository as newsdev/docker-rails

please let me know when it is django thanks

At the moment, the section of the Dockerfile that runs bundle install will fail if gems are not vendored locally in the repository:

# Install gems
ONBUILD COPY Gemfile Gemfile.lock /usr/src/app/
ONBUILD COPY vendor /usr/src/app/vendor
ONBUILD RUN bundle install --local --jobs `nproc`

Is there any way to make this step somehow optional? While vendoring works for us as a general rule, there are cases where it makes less sense, such as in open source projects.

The following RUN command is failing for me:

Step 8 : RUN gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 279D5C91
 ---> Running in d578ff79371e
gpg: directory `/root/.gnupg' created
gpg: new configuration file `/root/.gnupg/gpg.conf' created
gpg: WARNING: options in `/root/.gnupg/gpg.conf' are not yet active during this run
gpg: keyring `/root/.gnupg/secring.gpg' created
gpg: keyring `/root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg' created
gpg: requesting key 279D5C91 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
gpgkeys: key 279D5C91 can't be retrieved
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
The command '/bin/sh -c gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 279D5C91' returned a non-zero code: 2

Does that key id need to be updated from something?