Key Features page in docs - follow up questions about scores

[tennlee]

ping @nicholasloveday I'm happy with this page as-is, but it would be fine to make some of the suggestions Steph has made also. Just let us know what you think.

[Steph-Chong]

I have since had some additional thoughts.

I think it might be worth mentioning the following two things (I haven't work-shopped the language, I just typed these out quickly):

• Can be used at any scale - from megabytes to petabytes
• Something about preserving and reducing dimensions
  (Obviously the language would need fixing)

Also, is it additionally worth mentioning that scores includes consistent and threshold weighted scores?

[nicholasloveday]

Regarding questions 2 and 4, I suggest changing the "complex scores..." line to
"recently developed, user-focused scores and diagnostics including threshold weighted scores (e.g., threshold weighted continuous ranked probability score (twCRPS) (Gneiting and Ranjan 2011) and threshold weighted mean squared error (MSE) (Taggart 2022), Murphy diagrams (Ehm et al., 2016), and isotonic regression for reliability diagrams (Dimitriadis et al., 2021).

[nicholasloveday]

Regarding question 3. I don't feel like any changes need to be made

[nicholasloveday]

Can be used at any scale - from megabytes to petabytes

This relates to the existing line "Uses Dask for scaling and performance.", which I think is fine

[Steph-Chong]

Thanks for that helpful feedback @nicholasloveday. I'll update the page to incorporate it.