mtfoley / copy-issues-action Goto Github PK

For error in action, see https://github.com/open-sauced/hot/actions/runs/2475281479

YAML parser error appears to point to new lines in action.yml:
https://github.com/bdougie/take-action/blob/5a7a7d66c32aa9f8cb8a0bb395adf5c49d093a43/action.yml#L24

cc @bdougie @jamesgeddes

For error in action, see https://github.com/open-sauced/hot/actions/runs/2475281479

YAML parser error appears to point to new lines in action.yml:
https://github.com/bdougie/take-action/blob/5a7a7d66c32aa9f8cb8a0bb395adf5c49d093a43/action.yml#L24

cc @bdougie @jamesgeddes

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
May be useful to show examples in the README of use of watched-files for repo languages other than JS. Case in point, this Java project:
mufajjul/aml-mlflow-java-example#2

The languages I could think of off-hand would be:

• Java, pod.xml?
• Golang, e.g. go.mod, go.sum
• Python, requirements.txt

Suggestions very welcome.

Describe the solution you'd like
Would like to formulate a few samples and validate them with contributors. Given enough samples, may be better to make a folder of them and link from the README.

cc @bdougie @0-vortex @mufajjul

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
it would be great to have a boolean flag to choose whether to post a comment or not (specifically in the body check test)
that way if i am using the action with multiple variations i can control when and what to comment

Describe the solution you'd like
postComment: true / false

Describe alternatives you've considered
overriding the value with "" but it simply posts the default value

Additional context
N/A

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
since Github allows multiple ways to link an issue to a PR, (direct reference , full reference , url) it could be nice to have multiple regexes as input in order to cover all options or if referencing to some external options.
it is also useful if you want to detect multiple dependencies / requirements.

Describe the solution you'd like
option to input multiple regexes (bonus: parameter to define if the result should consider an OR option between the results or an AND option - meaning , should any of the regexes match or all of them)

Describe alternatives you've considered
running the action multiple times in the same flow with different regex everytime and use some env variable to manage the results.

Additional context
N/A

Feature Request

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Forking from JoshuaKGoldberg/create-typescript-app#23: folks sometimes misunderstand the "accepting PRs" label concept and send a PR for an issue not yet ready to accept one. That's a situation I'd like an action to post about on PRs.

Describe the solution you'd like

It'd be nice if we could have an option pair like:

• required-issue-labels: Optional string[] of labels that must be on a linked issue
• required-issue-labels-comment: Optional string text to post when require issue label(s) are missing on a linked issue

The compliance bot should post an informative message when that happens.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I could do it myself, but it'd be nice to have it here 🤔

Additional context

I'd be very happy to send this as a feature!

if you quote a .taken issue, the workflow will run for the user that is quoting; it should be ignored IMHO to let us use the full GitHub functionality on the comments 🍕

if you quote a .taken issue, the workflow will run for the user that is quoting; it should be ignored IMHO to let us use the full GitHub functionality on the comments 🍕

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

When a PR is opened in my project, I have users enter a description using the placeholder description. The expectation is that they remove the placeholder text with their own.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

It would be nice to have a placeholder check on the compliance action where I can confirm that PR description was added.

open-sauced/open-sauced#1443 (comment)

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Issues forms would be nice on PRs but they do not exist.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.