[BUG] Unable to access docker daemon about oxker

[mrjackwills]

Yeah, oxker should definitely correctly read and handle the $DOCKER_HOST env.

As for the debug mode, again, yes it should force quit(?) if a docker connection cannot be achieved.

In the mean time, I think you should be able to use the DockerHub/ghcr image, but mount your custom socket instead of the default:

docker run --rm -it -v ~/.orbstack/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro --pull=always mrjackwills/oxker

Although obviously this isn't a good long term solution.

Unfortunately I am away from my computer for at least another week, so I can't test, or implement, any fixes at the moment. Rust 1.71.0 has just been released, and I usually try to follow the same six week release schedule with oxker.

[halostatue]

I’ll need to come back to this in a couple of days, but I can try it from source.

[halostatue]

I’ve done a bit more research, and I think that there’s an opportunity for a crate here to improve Docker context support across Rust projects. I suspect that there’s explicit code that could be translated from Go in the docker command-line itself, but here’s what I have seen:

• contexts are external to the Docker API, managed entirely in ~/.docker.
• the current context is found via [~/.docker/config.json].currentContexst
• contexts themselves are defined in ~/.docker/contexts/meta/*/meta.json; the directory between meta/ and meta.json appears to be some sort of UUID-ish value (it might be a hashed value of the context name)
• the contents of meta.json is incomplete compared to docker context inspect --format json CONTEXT

meta.json:

{
  "Name": "orbstack",
  "Metadata": {
    "Description": "OrbStack"
  },
  "Endpoints": {
    "docker": {
      "Host": "unix:///Users/austin/.orbstack/run/docker.sock",
      "SkipTLSVerify": false
    }
  }
}

docker context inspect --format json orbstack

[
  {
    "Name": "orbstack",
    "Metadata": {
      "Description": "OrbStack"
    },
    "Endpoints": {
      "docker": {
        "Host": "unix:///Users/austin/.orbstack/run/docker.sock",
        "SkipTLSVerify": false
      }
    },
    "TLSMaterial": {},
    "Storage": {
      "MetadataPath": "/Users/austin/.docker/contexts/meta/2d89b732b01a00a2d1675ed3cee9fd0f965daadf90603c989dd3afd4569c6896",
      "TLSPath": "/Users/austin/.docker/contexts/tls/2d89b732b01a00a2d1675ed3cee9fd0f965daadf90603c989dd3afd4569c6896"
    }
  }
]

Ignoring the fact that docker context inspect --format json returns an array, there are two additional keys TLSMaterial (unknown contents, empty in my context) and Storage (which is constructed from the discovered file paths themselves).

I’m not good enough with Rust to build such a crate, nor do I really have an interest in maintaining such a crate (my interest in Docker and related tools is as a user, not someone who wants to build tools for Docker), but this is what I have found.

[halostatue]

The issue isn’t related to contexts, but is related to automatic resolution of $DOCKER_HOST if it isn’t pointing to a Unix socket, if I’m reading it correctly. That said, bollard is probably the right place to add this functionality, since it’s where connections are resolved.

If I were to weigh in on that, I would suggest:

• Docker::connect_with_context_defaults() - follows the Docker CLI behaviour ($DOCKER_HOST overrides any context, checks the currentContext value and resolves that if not default, falls back to Docker::connect_with_socket_defaults() otherwise)
• Docker::connect_with_context() - parameterized context start, which I believe would ignore $DOCKER_HOST, but I’m not sure.

Those could also be simplified as Docker::connect_with_defaults() or Docker::connect(), but I’m not sure that the creator of bollard would want that, based on the comments there.

If you decide to implement this independently of bollard, you would basically be getting the EndPoints.docker.Host value and using Docker::connect_with_socket() if it does not start with tcp:// and Docker::connect_with_ssl() if it starts with tcp:// and SkipTLSVerify is false (the default).

[mrjackwills]

@halostatue I've just pushed a branch fix/host, which I think should solve the issue. A new cli arg is available, --host, to set the docker host path. However, it'll also check for a $DOCKER_HOST env, at the moment the cli arg takes priority over the env - do you think this is the correct order?

Secondly, when in debug mode, it should exit with code 1 if there are any errors - amazed that this hasn't come up before and that I missed this.

If you are unable, or unwilling, to build from source, let me know and I can upload a binary here.

[halostatue]

Sorry for the long delay, but the fix/host branch works when setting $DOCKER_HOST. Ideally, oxker should work such that it can query the Docker contexts to find the current list and get the socket directly:

$ docker context ls --format '{{ . | json }}' | jq -s '.[] | select(.Current == true) | .DockerEndpoint'
"unix:///Users/austin/.orbstack/run/docker.sock"

But this can be considered closed because it now works with $DOCKER_HOST.

[mrjackwills]

@halostatue Thank you for taking the time to check that it works. I wasn't really aware of the Docker context before you submitted the issue. I should probably read the docs further to make sure I fully understand it, to make oxker find the context automatically and correctly as you suggest.

One final note, did you manage to test the --host cli arg, and if so did that work correctly?

Thanks again

[halostatue]

It does:

$ oxker --host (docker context ls --format '{{ . | json }}' | jq -r -s '.[] | select(.Current == true) | .DockerEndpoint')

(I use fish, so that’s why the lack of $.)

[mrjackwills]

Perfect thanks, I'll merge the branch, and probably wait til rust 1.72.0 on August 24th before publishing a new version. Will do some testing about auto context finding that can be terminal agnostic.

[mrjackwills]

Thank you, highly informative and helpful.

oxker uses a crate called bollard to communicate with Docker. They actually have an open issue at the moment that I think might be related (I still haven't read enough into the Docker context, it's on my todo list) fussybeaver/bollard#310