martinribelotta / imxrt1020-module Goto Github PK

I have ordered samples, and I want to go ahead and produce a few PCB's for first prototypes.
I just want to check and ask if this is a good idea now or I better should wait if some pending changes are up in the pipe?

SWO is great for pulling data (trace, print text, ...) from the core, but requires the SWO pin routed to the header.
Concern: The SWO pin is shared with ENET_CRS_DV (pin 97, GPIO_AD_B0_11) and cannot route to pinheader without signal degradation.

Thank you for that really great project!
Just a question: was there a special reason to use a 4x2 (instead the standard 5x2) for J47 except to possibly save some space?

Best regards,
Erich

Investigate the migration of design to more cheap 6/6mils tech and 0.3mm hole.

Need:

• Simulation of SDRAM route: 5mil/7mil to 6mil/7mil is not significative change on signal integrity
• Re-estimation of size: The global size of the board remain unchange
• Simulation of hot-speed signals like usb HS, ETH and SDRAM reflections

Maybe not for first prototype.

The imxrt1020 module is too much generic. Need a new name.

The tentative name was CIAA-7 (in spanish "computadora industrial abierta argentina") but due the international contribution this require other name convention (and the CIAA name is creepy in all form 😆 )

Some sugestions:

• imxrt1020-board 👍
• imx-rt module
• iMX-SBC
• Another obscure name referring particular situation, country or ideology)
• Jon Connour Board or other altered cinema/comic/variete character name
• Your sugesstion
• RT1020-[A-Z]* with greek/roman good names 👍