The rebuttal_alam_2024 from martinbulla

rebuttal_alam_2024's Introduction

Data and code for "No support for honest signalling of male quality in zebra finch song"

When using this content PLEASE CITE the paper (link will be added soon)) and this repository.

Fig_4c.csv: source data provided by Alam et al. (2024, Nature)
rebuttal_fig_2.csv: source data provided by Alam et al. (2024, Nature) and data measured by us from their Extended Data Fig. 6 (green versus black bars during playback)

R-scripts used in the analysis:

Fig_point_1.r uses Fig_4c.csv and generates our Fig. 1; columns: tutor - unique tutor ID, pupil - unique pupil ID for the given tutor, tutor_path - song path length of the tutor, pupil_path - song path length of the pupil
Fig_point_2.r uses rebuttal_fig_2.csv and generates our Fig. 2; columns: trial_id - unique trial ID, side_bias - was the long-path song during the trial played in the preferred arm or non-preferred arm by the female during the baseline period?, song_pair - unique song-pair ID; long - path length of the long path song, short - path length of the short path song, pre - the percentage of pre-trial time spent in the arm where long path song would be played during the trial, trial - the percentage of trial time spent in the arm with long path song, post - the percentage of post-trial time spent in the arm where long path song was played during the trial, trial_long - trial time spent in the arm with long path song, trial_short - trial time spent in the arm with short path song