ltzmax / maxcogs

Cogs for Red-DiscordBot V3.

Hello 👋

I'm a cog developer, those cogs works only on Red-DiscordBot. I build cogs that I find useful for myself, and that i believe could be valuable for others to use on their bots. This page might be a bit light on content right now but anyway.

Links

• my main projects is my cogs

maxcogs's Issues

[Feature Request]: Who's That Pokemon Channel and Timed Guess

Cog

whosthatpokemon

Discord username

No response

What feature do you want?

A way to select the channel where you want the bot to be used, and an automatic run of the game in the selected channel, with a long delay between guesses.

[WhosThatPokemon] Add modals to guess the pokemon.

Cog

whosthatpokemon

Discord username

No response

What feature do you want?

Currently this cog is based on guessing the pokemon by sending any names of the pokemon directly in the chat.
What i want is i'll have to write a modal for this to allow anyone to guess the name and not just the author which is what current is.

What will be with this:

• A modal with a button below the image descripted as Guess The Pokemon

I'll be doing this in the future updates of the cog to apply modal support.

UPDATE

This can now be tested on the feat/wtp-modal-support branch.

Discord.py 2.0 changes

While discord.py 2.0 is unknown when it will be released or if it will ever happen and while no official statement, i'll leave this here for what cog needs changes and not.

[Suggestion] Add option to disable user pings in the veryfun cog

My server has really been enjoying using this cog but there's one slight annoyance. Since the easiest way to interact with another user is by mentioning them, most of the time commands from veryfun are used people get pinged twice, once from the user invoking the command and once from the bot response right after.

There are some users we really don't want to disturb with pings, so this isn't super ideal.

It would be incredibly helpful if there was a toggle in this cog that makes the bot respond with the same embed but no user ping.

[Feature Request]: recommendations command

Cog

themoviedb

Discord username

ltzmax

What feature do you want?

Descriptions

Looking to impliment a recommentations command for movies and tv shows.

Could be something like this:

• recommendations tv
• recommendations movie

Docs:

• Tv shows: https://developer.themoviedb.org/reference/tv-series-recommendations
• Movies: https://developer.themoviedb.org/reference/movie-recommendations

[Feature Request]: count of actions for the target user

Cog

veryfun

Discord username

No response

What feature do you want?

Currently i do not count the target users, but seems to be a popular option. This should be added in the description, not footer. Or well footer is also fine but preferable in description.

Pr are welcome.

Add approve and reject command

Cog

Suggestion

Discord username

ltzmax

What feature do you want?

I wanna add a command approve and reject to approve or reject a suggestions. right now you cannot do that and it might be useful for servers that wanna either approve or reject their suggestions they get.

[veryfun] A way to not specify anybody in the command arguments

I realize this is a roleplaying cog so interaction between 2 users is the intended use.

But I noticed some of the people in my server like popping in and just sending one of the actions in a general manner to everyone who's online, rather than one specific user. To achieve this, everyone's been mentioning themselves to avoid pinging anyone in specific.

While this works fine, it does look a bit odd for the embed to say, for example, "John hugged John". I think it could be a nice touch to allow a user to not specify anyone so the action goes out to everyone, just to make a bit less weird looking.

In my head this would either let you run the command with no arguments or let you run it with a specific preset argument, either of which would always give the same output.

So for implementation 1 you could simply run .hug and the embed would say "[user] hugged everyone/the server/etc."

For implementation 2 would be something like .hug everyone, with the embed being the same as example 1.

I'm not sure which is easier to add, but either works equally well in my view.

I saw an implementation with a generic "server" argument in loveplay, another cog with this same purpose.

I know it is a tiny visual change, but I think it's one users would appreciate.