lovesegfault / beautysh Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWA Bash beautifier for the masses.
Home Page: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/beautysh
License: MIT License
A Bash beautifier for the masses.
Home Page: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/beautysh
License: MIT License
before:
cd $(python -c "print('/');
print('tmp');
print('/');
print('foo');")
after
cd $(python -c "print('/');
print('tmp');
print('/');
print('foo');")
I am pretty sure there are multiple ways to format this 'beauty', but imho the provided one is the least correct 😉
It seems this executable is unable to handle while
loops formatted as below:
while read -r thing; do
echo "thing done"
done <<< $filename # or command
As soon as I remove those <<<
, beautysh
is behaving perfectly, as expected.
Would be useful if it could just verify if something would change, without actually changing the files. So that it can be used as part of a test suite.
See the --check
flag in black for comparison.
It could print something like "x number of changes would be made to file zzz", and exit with 0 if there are no changes, and exit with 1 if there are changes.
Just a minor comment regarding your example of bash's ambiguous syntax. It's not a valid code:
bash-4.3$ bash -n <<< "echo done;done"
bash: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
bash: line 1: `echo done;done'
And even other parser, Bashlex, returns "unexpected token 'done'".
I'd love to see some example where is Beautysh failing on a valid code if there is any.
Thanks!
It would be nice if beautysh had an option to replace old test format with new eg:
if [ "$foo" == "$bar" ]; then
becomes
if [[ "$foo" == "$bar" ]]; then
Personally I would prefer the variables to remain quoted in this case even thought it is optional with the [[
form.
Examples:
find . -name '*.sh' -exec grep -H 'if \[ ' {} \;
The reverse would also be good for people who want to write portable code. Could be implemented in a similar way to --force-function-style
ie:
--force-test-style bash|compatible
Shell test styles that can be specified via --force-test-style are:
compatible: single bracket test compatible with sh, e.g. if [ "$foo"
bash: double bracket test used by bash and zsh, e.g. if [[ "$foo"
It throw this error out, but i'm not sure what it mean??
File src/core/download_resource_management: error: indent/outdent mismatch: 2.
It would be great if i had an option to use tabs instead of spaces, or if the formatter would respect the setting that my file is set to rather than replace all my tabs with spaces every time I format it.
Hello @bemeurer
I encounter this error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/beautysh", line 11, in <module>
sys.exit(main())
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 11, in main
Beautify().main()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 215, in main
error |= self.beautify_file(path)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 181, in beautify_file
result, error = self.beautify_string(data, path)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 76, in beautify_string
if(re.search(here_string, test_record) and not
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/re.py", line 182, in search
return _compile(pattern, flags).search(string)
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/re.py", line 301, in _compile
p = sre_compile.compile(pattern, flags)
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/sre_compile.py", line 562, in compile
p = sre_parse.parse(p, flags)
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/sre_parse.py", line 855, in parse
p = _parse_sub(source, pattern, flags & SRE_FLAG_VERBOSE, 0)
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/sre_parse.py", line 416, in _parse_sub
not nested and not items))
File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/sre_parse.py", line 616, in _parse
source.tell() - here + len(this))
sre_constants.error: nothing to repeat at position 25
when trying to beautify this bash script
# Syntax-highlight JSON strings or files
# Usage: `json '{"foo":42}'` or `echo '{"foo":42}' | json`
function json() {
if [ -t 0 ]; then # argument
python -mjson.tool <<< "$*"
else # pipe
python -mjson.tool
fi;
}
To test that the script actually works:
json '{"foo":42}'
echo '{"foo":42}' | json
I'm using beautysh 3.8
Please add support for a .beautysh
configuration file, e.g. like yamllint.
This changes the value of the string. Perhaps multiline strings should be treated like herefiles?
$ scripts/beautysh.py - <<EOF
> #!/bin/bash
> if true; then
> VAR="
> value"
> fi
> EOF
#!/bin/bash
if true; then
VAR="
value"
fi
I have a few projects indented by vim. Don't want to create large changes just to get indent-support in atom :)
Hi,
I'd like to run beautysh in a Windows 10 (Python 3.8) environment to format a bunch of shell scripts.
These scripts all have a new line character \n
but after the beautysh run the new line character was changed to \r\n
.
Now the scripts couldn't execute on a Linux or Unix system and they are useless.
Is there a way to preserve the original line separator character?
By the the way, using beautysh in Linux/Unix environment is not an option at the moment.
I got the following error message 'indent/outdent mismatch: 1', when adding this line of code to my script:
max=$((1<<63))
Hello, I seem to have encountered an issue which seems to be the inverse of #2
With the given block of code (tabs or spaces):
#!/usr/bin/env bash
foo(){
thing=${1}
if [[ ${thing} == "bob" ]]
then
echo "Yar!"
elif [[ ${thing} == "jack" ]]
then
echo "Yip!"
else
echo "Nar"
fi
}
for thing in "bob" "jim" "jack"
do
foo "${thing}"
if (( $? == 0 ))
then
echo "Returned success"
elif (( $? > 0 ))
then
echo "No bueno"
else
echo "Bad magic"
fi
done
When run through beautysh ( 4.1 or 5.0.2 ), indentation is stripped at elif:
$ beautysh -v
5.0.2
$ beautysh foo.sh
$ cat foo.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
foo(){
thing=${1}
if [[ ${thing} == "bob" ]]
then
echo "Yar!"
elif [[ ${thing} == "jack" ]]
then
echo "Yip!"
else
echo "Nar"
fi
}
for thing in "bob" "jim" "jack"
do
foo "${thing}"
if (( $? == 0 ))
then
echo "Returned success"
elif (( $? > 0 ))
then
echo "No bueno"
else
echo "Bad magic"
fi
done
I noticed that with latest master the following code block
# do basic argument checks
if [ "$A" == "true" ] || [ "$A" == "false" ] || [ "$A" == "noconflicts" ] || \
[ "$B" == "true" ] || [ "$B" == "false" ] || [ "$B" == "noconflicts" ] || \
[ "$C" == "true" ] || [ "$C" == "false" ]; then
printerr "Internal error: invalid function call argument"
exit 2
fi
is now indented as:
# do basic argument checks
if [ "$A" == "true" ] || [ "$A" == "false" ] || [ "$A" == "noconflicts" ] || \
[ "$B" == "true" ] || [ "$B" == "false" ] || [ "$B" == "noconflicts" ] || \
[ "$C" == "true" ] || [ "$C" == "false" ]; then
printerr "Internal error: invalid function call argument"
exit 2
fi
3rd line has wrong indentation. I think this is perhaps a regression introduced with one of my latest patches, so I'm opening this to avoid forgetting.
My go-to way of quickly parsing arguments is as follows:
#!/bin/bash
quiet="true"
files=()
for arg in "${@}"; do
case "${arg}" in
"-v" | "--verbose")
quiet="false"
;;
*)
files+=(
"${arg}"
)
;;
esac
done
Beautysh (v6.1.0) incorrectly reports this as indent/outdent mismatch and instead indents it like so:
#!/bin/bash
quiet="true"
files=()
for arg in "${@}"; do
case "${arg}" in
"-v" | "--verbose")
quiet="false"
;;
*)
files+=(
"${arg}"
)
;;
esac
done
The deciding factor seems to be the multi-line parenthesis in assigning files
. If I assign it all on one line, like this:
files+=("${arg}")
then beautysh is satisfied with the indentation (i.e. doesn't change it or report a mismatch).
Compared to https://github.com/ewiger/beautify_bash his project offers?
Hi, am I missing something?
angristan@xps ~> pip install beautysh
Collecting beautysh
Using cached beautysh-3.3.tar.gz
Installing collected packages: beautysh
Running setup.py install for beautysh ... error
Complete output from command /usr/bin/python -u -c "import setuptools, tokenize;__file__='/tmp/pip-build-i4efxqie/beautysh/setup.py';f=getattr(tokenize, 'open', open)(__file__);code=f.read().replace('\r\n', '\n');f.close();exec(compile(code, __file__, 'exec'))" install --record /tmp/pip-g3mimjnp-record/install-record.txt --single-version-externally-managed --compile:
running install
running build
running build_py
file beautysh.py (for module beautysh) not found
creating build
creating build/lib
creating build/lib/beautysh
copying beautysh/__main__.py -> build/lib/beautysh
copying beautysh/__init__.py -> build/lib/beautysh
copying beautysh/beautysh.py -> build/lib/beautysh
file beautysh.py (for module beautysh) not found
running install_lib
creating /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/beautysh
error: could not create '/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/beautysh': Permission denied
----------------------------------------
Command "/usr/bin/python -u -c "import setuptools, tokenize;__file__='/tmp/pip-build-i4efxqie/beautysh/setup.py';f=getattr(tokenize, 'open', open)(__file__);code=f.read().replace('\r\n', '\n');f.close();exec(compile(code, __file__, 'exec'))" install --record /tmp/pip-g3mimjnp-record/install-record.txt --single-version-externally-managed --compile" failed with error code 1 in /tmp/pip-build-i4efxqie/beautysh/
Dependabot couldn't authenticate with https://pypi.python.org/simple/.
You can provide authentication details in your Dependabot dashboard by clicking into the account menu (in the top right) and selecting 'Config variables'.
When I update beautysh, I got the following output...
c:\>pip` install -U beautysh
Collecting beautysh
Using cached https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/a9/2c/91a68193e758db22a92e08cb9f49898d545036aa20fee8db63a062c1449e/beautysh-3.12.tar.gz
Complete output from command python setup.py egg_info:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
File "C:\Users\fish\AppData\Local\Temp\pip-install-87geoahp\beautysh\setup.py", line 13, in <module>
DESCRIPTION = fh.read()
UnicodeDecodeError: 'cp950' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 288: illegal multibyte sequence
----------------------------------------
Command "python setup.py egg_info" failed with error code 1 in C:\Users\fish\AppData\Local\Temp\pip-install-87geoahp\beautysh\
How to fix it?
In setup.py, please modify it as following...
--- with open("README.md", "r") as fh:
+++ with open("README.md", "r", encoding='utf8') as fh:
usage: beautysh [--indent-size INDENT_SIZE] [--backup] [--check] [--tab]
[--force-function-style FORCE_FUNCTION_STYLE] [--version]
[--help]
[FILE [FILE ...]]
beautysh: error: unrecognized arguments: -f
Hide Stack Trace
Error: usage: beautysh [--indent-size INDENT_SIZE] [--backup] [--check] [--tab]
[--force-function-style FORCE_FUNCTION_STYLE] [--version]
[--help]
[FILE [FILE ...]]
beautysh: error: unrecognized arguments: -f
at /Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/src/beautifiers/executable.coffee:183:23
at tryCatcher (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/util.js:16:23)
at Promise._settlePromiseFromHandler (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:512:31)
at Promise._settlePromise (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:569:18)
at Promise._settlePromise0 (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:614:10)
at Promise._settlePromises (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/promise.js:694:18)
at _drainQueueStep (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:138:12)
at _drainQueue (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:131:9)
at Async._drainQueues (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:147:5)
at Async.drainQueues (/Users/treverchambersewing/.atom/packages/atom-beautify/node_modules/bluebird/js/release/async.js:17:14)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:86:5)
Sometimes I define in bash scripts a variable using multiple successive lines to get one or more newlines in the according string. For e.g. the script
#!/bin/sh
T=""
if [ "$T" = "" ]; then
T="Line1
Line2"
fi
echo "$T"
would output
Line1
Line2
But after running beautysh
about that script one get the code
#!/bin/sh
T=""
if [ "$T" = "" ]; then
T="Line1
Line2"
fi
echo "$T"
and the according output is now erroneously
Line1
Line2
So such continuation lines should probably not be indented.
Dear maintainer(s),
Snaps are universal Linux packages that can be installed and run on many GNU+Linux distributions with ease. I've been following the Snapcrafters instructions and have built a working snap on the Snap Store, you may try it by running the following commands after installing snapd:
sudo snap install beautysh
I'm also looking forward to working with you to make the packaging work upstream (if you're interested). You may want to check out the current packaging recipe, the documentation, registering a developer account on the Snap Store, and get in touch with us to transfer the work under your control.
Thanks for your time and attention.
I would prefer indentation on continued lines
git fetch --prune upstream \
&& git merge upstream/$branch \
&& git push origin $branch
currently becomes:
git fetch --prune upstream \
&& git merge upstream/$branch \
&& git push origin $branch
Even a markers for copy block to output would be better.
I discovered that, at least using beautysh 4.1, the following snipped of code will not be parsed corretly:
function set_affinity() { MASK_TMP=$((1<<2)) }
the problem looks like the presence of the "<<" operator...
beautysh will fail with "indent/outdent mismatch: 2 "
I installed beautysh as pip install beautysh
, and then tried to run it but it did nothing.
~ ❱❱❱ python --version
Python 3.9.6
~ ❱❱❱ cat temp.sh
echo "meep"|grep "e";echo "no u"~ ❱❱❱
~ ❱❱❱ beautysh temp.sh
~ ❱❱❱ cat temp.sh
echo "meep"|grep "e";echo "no u"~ ❱❱❱
If you have something like:
#!/bin/bash
if [ -f testfile1 ]; then
echo "1"
elif [ -f testfile2 ]; then
echo "2"
else
echo "3"
fi
The result is:
#!/bin/bash
if [ -f testfile1 ]; then
echo "1"
elif [ -f testfile2 ]; then
echo "2"
else
echo "3"
fi
So it seems elif is not handled correctly.
Hello,
your PR #49 unnecessarily broke the integration with atom-beautify which is rather sad. After reading the comments I am sad about this little respect to other peoples work and time.
In the end, "bumping the major version" as you described, didn't really help me much in getting my scripts nicer!
Please either put the parameter back in, at least for a while, or inform the maintainers of atom-beautify about this change.
I'm trying to install beautysh via git. I used those commands:
git clone https://github.com/lovesegfault/beautysh
cd beautysh
python setup.py install
I get this error code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 2, in <module>
from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named setuptools
I see you created a 3.7 release. Could you also tag it since folks using pre-commit would generally be checking out the repo using a tag? Thanks!
I had a bash script that generates a markdown file which has the following problem when trying to format it (I simplified the code that failed):
./test.sh
if true; then
echo "
[\`something\`](Markdown link)
"
fi
It also fails with:
if true; then
echo "
[\`something\`
"
fi
Command: beautysh --check ./test.sh
Error: File ./test.sh: error: indent/outdent mismatch: 1.
beautysh --version
: 5.0.2
It's not really a problem for me (I just changed the line so that this error is not thrown), but I wanted to notify anyone that this parse error exists in case someone wants to fix it.
Hi @bemeurer ,
I noticed that I can install the new release (4.0) only by doing:
pip3 install beautysh
if I do:
pip install beautysh==4.0
I get:
Collecting beautysh==4.0
Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement beautysh==4.0 (from versions: 4.0.macosx-10.14-x86_64, 2.2.2, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12)
No matching distribution found for beautysh==4.0
I think this is due to the fact that on pypi there is no .tar.gz...
First of all, thanks for providing such a great tool that manages to parse shell syntax correctly 99% of the time. That's no small feat!
I have a case where beautysh appears to do the wrong thing, so I wanted to document it here in case it helps improve the project.
I have a script here that beautysh appears to parse incorrectly. If I remove the @formatter
directives here then I get an indent/outdent mismatch: 2
error and beautysh over-indents the rest of the script.
First: I'm very happy to find a bash beautifier. But for one of my scripts it fails with
error: indent/outdent mismatch: 1.
although I (and also "shellcheck") didn't find an error.
After some trail and error attempts I could reduce the problem to the following command using command substitution
T=$(echo "\"a\"")
But for e.g. putting a space before the right parenthesis let beautish work without an error!
So strange! Works if I remove the space at the end of the string.
$ scripts/beautysh.py - <<EOF
> #!/bin/bash
> VAR="
> text "
>
> if true; then
> echo should be indented
> fi
> EOF
#!/bin/bash
VAR="
text "
if true; then
echo should be indented
fi
I recently had to disable formatting around a particular line because beautysh
was over-indenting the lines following this one:
grep --quiet --ignore-case "^127\.0\.0\.1\s$${escaped_hostname}\s*$" "${hosts_file}"
The full script can be found in cisagov/cool-assessment-terraform@451c74c.
PS: Thank you for developing this excellent tool - I am a fan! 👍
Installing beautysh via pip fails, see failure output below.
$ pip install beautysh
Collecting beautysh
Using cached beautysh-3.7.tar.gz
Installing collected packages: beautysh
Running setup.py install for beautysh ... error
Complete output from command /usr/bin/python -u -c "import setuptools, tokenize;__file__='/private/var/folders/sv/5gh4tk990539nzhdt311pg0h000_fp/T/pip-build-9uWIcs/beautysh/setup.py';f=getattr(tokenize, 'open', open)(__file__);code=f.read().replace('\r\n', '\n');f.close();exec(compile(code, __file__, 'exec'))" install --record /var/folders/sv/5gh4tk990539nzhdt311pg0h000_fp/T/pip-knmUwV-record/install-record.txt --single-version-externally-managed --compile:
running install
running build
running build_py
file beautysh.py (for module beautysh) not found
creating build
creating build/lib
creating build/lib/beautysh
copying beautysh/__init__.py -> build/lib/beautysh
copying beautysh/__main__.py -> build/lib/beautysh
copying beautysh/beautysh.py -> build/lib/beautysh
file beautysh.py (for module beautysh) not found
running install_lib
creating /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/beautysh
error: could not create '/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/beautysh': Permission denied
----------------------------------------
Command "/usr/bin/python -u -c "import setuptools, tokenize;__file__='/private/var/folders/sv/5gh4tk990539nzhdt311pg0h000_fp/T/pip-build-9uWIcs/beautysh/setup.py';f=getattr(tokenize, 'open', open)(__file__);code=f.read().replace('\r\n', '\n');f.close();exec(compile(code, __file__, 'exec'))" install --record /var/folders/sv/5gh4tk990539nzhdt311pg0h000_fp/T/pip-knmUwV-record/install-record.txt --single-version-externally-managed --compile" failed with error code 1 in /private/var/folders/sv/5gh4tk990539nzhdt311pg0h000_fp/T/pip-build-9uWIcs/beautysh/
Machine specs:
MacOS Sierra 10.12.6
$ pip --version
pip 9.0.1 from /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/pip-9.0.1-py2.7.egg (python 2.7)
Hi @bemeurer Can you create a sublime text plugin for this. It would be really helpful for a lot of sublime text users like me.
Beautysh is currently not usable for BASH scripts.
List of modifications that change the meaning of statements:
``
I don't know if this is inside the scope of the project, but it would be awesome if the --check
option could output, maybe combining with another option, why a file is not beautified.
The use case is that I want to use beautysh for parse a lot of files, but I can risk beautysh making a mistake and the effort of checking file by file seems excessive to me.
Anyway, thanks for this tool, is very useful!
Over on conda-forge we had to temporarily break our "sanity check" testing for 5.0.0, as the behavior of --help
(and --version
) has changed:
jovyan@jupyter-jupyterlab-2djupyterlab-2ddemo-2dvsakdy2y:~$ beautysh --help
usage: beautysh [--indent-size INDENT_SIZE] [--backup] [--check] [--tab] [--force-function-style FORCE_FUNCTION_STYLE] [--version] [--help] FILE [FILE ...]
beautysh: error: the following arguments are required: FILE
jovyan@jupyter-jupyterlab-2djupyterlab-2ddemo-2dvsakdy2y:~$ beautysh --version
usage: beautysh [--indent-size INDENT_SIZE] [--backup] [--check] [--tab] [--force-function-style FORCE_FUNCTION_STYLE] [--version] [--help] FILE [FILE ...]
beautysh: error: the following arguments are required: FILE
I haven't dug into the source too much, but it seems like this is probably a regression... nargs="*"
, or special-casing --help
and --version
would be great.
Hi,
First, thanks for making this cause for my server stuff i write a lot of bash scripts so it's very useful for me.
But i have some examples for you where it failed :) I'm not very familiar with phyton but, i'm a developer long time, so if i'm finding some time i maybe debug it too, but i think maybe will be much faster than me solving this issues :)
It doesn't fail at any bash script, but 3 from 7 files i've tested
I've attached them, if you don't want open the zip you can get them here too:
https://github.com/ShrimpDev/BashUpdateChecker/blob/master/checker.sh
https://github.com/ShrimpDev/BashUpdateChecker/blob/master/checker/joomla3.sh
https://github.com/ShrimpDev/BashUpdateChecker/blob/master/checker/roundcube.sh
And here are the error messages:
From joomla3.sh and roundcube.sh: File ./checker/roundcube.sh: error: indent/outdent mismatch: 1.
From checker.sh:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/beautysh", line 9, in <module>
load_entry_point('beautysh==2.2.2', 'console_scripts', 'beautysh')()
File "build/bdist.linux-armv7l/egg/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 10, in main
File "build/bdist.linux-armv7l/egg/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 162, in main
File "build/bdist.linux-armv7l/egg/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 146, in beautify_file
File "build/bdist.linux-armv7l/egg/beautysh/beautysh.py", line 67, in beautify_string
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/re.py", line 146, in search
return _compile(pattern, flags).search(string)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/re.py", line 251, in _compile
raise error, v # invalid expression
sre_constants.error: nothing to repeat
Hi,
I noticed that beautysh is not enforcing any specific style for the function declarations:
A)
function myfunc()
{
...
}
is accepted as well as
B)
function myfunc
{
...
}
and as well as
C)
myfunc()
{
...
}
I think beautysh should stick with one and enforce it.
What do you think?
Looks like having the do
and case
statements adjacent on the same line confounds beautysh.
$ scripts/beautysh.py - <<EOF
> #!/bin/bash
> while getopts "h" OPT; do case $OPT in
> *) true ;;
> esac
> done
>
> fn() {
> echo not indented
> }
> EOF
File (stdin): error: indent/outdent mismatch: -1.
#!/bin/bash
while getopts "h" OPT; do case in
*) true ;;
esac
done
fn() {
echo not indented
}
$ scripts/beautysh.py - <<EOF
> #!/bin/bash
> while getopts "h" OPT; do
> case $OPT in
> *) true ;;
> esac
> done
>
> fn() {
> echo indented
> }
> EOF
#!/bin/bash
while getopts "h" OPT; do
case in
*) true ;;
esac
done
fn() {
echo indented ok
}
Hi.
Here is a script that uses both variants of the case selector: a single close parenthesis, as well as open AND close parentheses. The output from the driver script runs the 4 usual shells, bash, dash, ksh, zsh to show that the syntax is acceptable to all. The final output is the result of beautysh, which does not indent correctly.
$ ./helper
Environment: LC_ALL = C, LANG = C
(Versions displayed with local utility "version")
OS, ker|rel, machine: Linux, 3.16.0-4-amd64, x86_64
Distribution : Debian 8.7 (jessie)
bash GNU bash 4.3.30
beautysh - ( local: RepRev 1.4, ~/bin/beautysh, 2016-03-31 )
-----
Code:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# @(#) s1 Demonstrate paren-case alternative, dash, bash, ksh.
LC_ALL=C ; LANG=C ; export LC_ALL LANG
pe() { for _i;do printf "%s" "$_i";done; printf "\n"; }
pl() { pe;pe "-----" ;pe "$*"; }
em() { pe "$*" >&2 ; }
db() { ( printf " db, ";for _i;do printf "%s" "$_i";done;printf "\n" ) >&2 ; }
db() { : ; }
# C=$HOME/bin/context && [ -f $C ] && $C
printf "\n Shell = %s\n\n" "$(ps | grep $$ | awk '{print $4}')"
w=0 x=0 y=0 z=0
case $1 in
w) w=1 ;;
(x) x=1 ;;
(y) y=1 ;;
(z) z=1 ;;
esac
pe " w = $w, x = $x, y = $y, z = $z"
exit
-----
Execution with bash:
Shell = bash
w = 1, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0
-----
Execution with dash:
Shell = dash
w = 0, x = 1, y = 0, z = 0
-----
Execution with ksh:
Shell = ksh
w = 0, x = 0, y = 1, z = 0
-----
Execution with zsh:
Shell = zsh
w = 0, x = 0, y = 0, z = 1
-----
Result of beautysh:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# @(#) s1 Demonstrate paren-case alternative, dash, bash, ksh.
LC_ALL=C ; LANG=C ; export LC_ALL LANG
pe() { for _i;do printf "%s" "$_i";done; printf "\n"; }
pl() { pe;pe "-----" ;pe "$*"; }
em() { pe "$*" >&2 ; }
db() { ( printf " db, ";for _i;do printf "%s" "$_i";done;printf "\n" ) >&2 ; }
db() { : ; }
# C=$HOME/bin/context && [ -f $C ] && $C
printf "\n Shell = %s\n\n" "$(ps | grep $$ | awk '{print $4}')"
w=0 x=0 y=0 z=0
case $1 in
w) w=1 ;;
(x) x=1 ;;
(y) y=1 ;;
(z) z=1 ;;
esac
pe " w = $w, x = $x, y = $y, z = $z"
exit
The following:
$python setup.py
throughs this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 2, in
from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named setuptools
Please add to docs the dependency for:
[SOLUTION]
To install setuptools on Debian, Ubuntu or Mint:
$ sudo apt-get install python-setuptools
For Python 3.X applications, install python3-setuptools instead.
$ sudo apt-get install python3-setuptools
On Red Hat based systems, setuptools comes pre-installed. For whatever reason if you want to install it, use the yum command.
$ sudo yum python-setuptools
Thanks!
Hello,
I would like to ask if it would be possible to provide the configuration with a file rather than cli flags. Potential fiels could be setup.cfg, an own file or the pyproject.toml.
If you see an option to add this, I'm happy to open a PR (if I manage it :-) )
Thanks,
Kai
Following @ankitshubham97's work on #21 it's be nice to get us added on PackageControl, Sublime's package manager.
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.