Comments (5)
That's not really how you should think about using the type field. You should instantiate the concrete classes you want to create (using a if/else or switch statement) rather than setting the type. There are too many ways the pattern you describe could break. Suppose the Child classes has setters, getters, validation, save hooks etc. None of those are going to get called unless you create a Child class explicitly.
from single-table-inheritance.
@aiakane16 check my posible solution, It might help you #50
from single-table-inheritance.
What about for using Laravel implicit binding? https://laravel.com/docs/5.7/routing#implicit-binding
from single-table-inheritance.
@jonspalmer, can I ask why this library has a newFromBuilder
function if you are supposed to create a new instance of the child class explicitly? I thought your newFromBuilder
override was supposed to get around that?
from single-table-inheritance.
@sarahmarshy newFromBuilder
is an internal API used by Eloquent to hydrate model classes before returning the results of a query. It's not intended as a API that any consumer would call directly.
from single-table-inheritance.
Related Issues (20)
- "Field 'type' doesn't have a default value" when saving a model HOT 3
- Update Readme HOT 1
- One record two types. HOT 3
- hasMany relation doesn't work for parent class
- Can't create a new record directly form the base class HOT 10
- Broken link in README - Mark Smith's website is gone HOT 1
- Laravel 5.7 Support HOT 6
- Type is not inserted when using Laravel factories HOT 1
- Travis Builds are failing HOT 2
- Laravel 5.8 support
- Support the Eloquent `retrieved` event HOT 1
- Cannot insert record HOT 6
- V0.8.6 causes incorrect attributes to be set HOT 11
- Laravel 6.0 support HOT 1
- Eager loading child model relationship HOT 2
- Enhence performance when querying root model of subclasses HOT 5
- PHP hangs when parent and child inheritance is not setted properly. HOT 3
- `newFromBuilder` does not maintain mutated attributes HOT 2
- onlyTrashed()->forceDelete() seems to lose the SingleTableInheritance scope, deletes way more than intended HOT 2
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from single-table-inheritance.