jacobadenbaum / textables.jl Goto Github PK

Currently, we're relying on something that got deprecated and has been removed in 0.22. Need to track this down and fix it before tagging a new release.

This issue is used to trigger TagBot; feel free to unsubscribe.

If you haven't already, you should update your TagBot.yml to include issue comment triggers.
Please see this post on Discourse for instructions and more details.

If you'd like for me to do this for you, comment TagBot fix on this issue.
I'll open a PR within a few hours, please be patient!

The current compatibility entry restricts the version of Compat to be v3. This has prevented the use of latest versions of DataFrames.jl. Please consider update the compatibility entry in Project.toml.

If I have a single TableCol (say t), and use the command to_tex(t) it throws up an error ERROR: MethodError: no method matching to_tex(::TableCol{1, 1}). The command works when I use to_tex(hcat(t,t)). It looks like creating a table needs at least two columns. I am not sure if that is desirable as some situations call for creating a single column table.

Would it be possible to include a capability to choose the order of rows in regression tables (or at least move certain variables to the top)? For example, if a variable is included in the third regression but not the first two, it is included at the bottom of the table. Would it be possible to include an option to move it to the top?

It would be nice to have an option like the following:

to_tex(table, border=:double)

Where the top and bottom borders of the table (which are printed as \toprule and \bottomrule by default) would be replaced with \hline \hline.

This shouldn't take much effort to do. Just need to add an extra option to TableParams with an appropriate default, and change the head and foot methods accordingly.

I get this error when I try to install with ] add TexTables

ERROR: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package StatsModels [3eaba693]:
 StatsModels [3eaba693] log:
 ├─possible versions are: [0.3.0-0.3.1, 0.4.0, 0.5.0, 0.6.0-0.6.10] or uninstalled
 ├─restricted by compatibility requirements with Bootstrap [e28b5b4c] to versions: 0.6.0-0.6.10
 │ └─Bootstrap [e28b5b4c] log:
 │   ├─possible versions are: [2.0.0-2.0.1, 2.1.0, 2.2.0] or uninstalled
 │   └─restricted to versions 2.2.0 by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 2.2.0
 └─restricted by compatibility requirements with TexTables [ebf5ac4f] to versions: 0.5.0 — no versions left
   └─TexTables [ebf5ac4f] log:
     ├─possible versions are: 0.1.0 or uninstalled
     └─restricted to versions * by an explicit requirement, leaving only versions 0.1.0

However, it works fine when I instead use ] add TexTables#master. Perhaps you haven't re-published the package recently?

This is a little tricky since each row needs an index. This can be solved by indexing by row number, but I think a lot of people who want this feature will not be happy with the row number showing up. So, this feature will need to come in two parts:

1. Convert DataFrame to IndexedTable
2. Update printing methods to allow the user to suppress printing the row index.

Neither of these is particularly hard. Just needs doing.

The current latex tables for export look terrible because of the inclusion of a toprule. While there are some tables for which this is appropriate, it should not be the default option.

@jacobadenbaum are you planning to maintain this package, or should we try and find someone else to take care of it?

When I ran the runtests.jl file, I got a message that two of the tests here were broken (not that they failed)

I notice that the two lines above the broken are commented out. Should lines 123 and 124 be commented out as well?

It seems like the output mixes \toprule and \bottomrule (booktab commands) with \hline (standard tabular command):

using TexTables
using RDatasets
       
neuro = RDatasets.dataset("boot", "neuro")
summarize(neuro) |> to_tex |> print

\begin{tabular}{r|ccccc}
\toprule
   & Obs & Mean     & Std. Dev. & Min      & Max      \\ \hline
V1 &  40 & -232.720 &    12.862 & -249.900 & -196.900 \\
V2 & 418 & -186.567 &    37.206 & -249.000 &  -98.600 \\
V3 & 469 &  -66.160 &    39.719 & -235.800 &   -0.100 \\
V4 & 468 &   48.074 &    30.760 &    1.000 &  197.800 \\
V5 & 445 &  162.483 &    38.111 &   75.600 &  249.300 \\
V6 &  90 &  229.740 &    18.718 &  154.300 &  249.700 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}

Please consider changing \hline to \midrule (or \toprule and \bottomrule to \hline).