github / gov-takedowns Goto Github PK

suspicious. hahah and in some russian notices are forks?!? why would one take down a fork while the original still remains? Any proofs on that?

FUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOUFUCK YOU

Hello,

I noticed the request 2021-01-22-BNIA from the Beijing Network Industry Association asking to remove several repos that allegedly violate the laws of PRC.

In the "GitHub Government Takedown Policy", a complete government takedown request is defined to "come from a relevant, official government agency".

As is stated in their self-introduction, the Beijing Network Industry Association is a "non-profit social organization legal entity" (非营利性社会团体法人机构), which is "voluntarily initiated by ISP, ICP, IDC and major Internet industrial units in Beijing".

Furthermore, according to "The overall plan for the decoupling of the industry associations and the administrative agencies" (行业协会商会与行政机关脱钩总体方案) published by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee (****办公厅) and the General Office of the State Council (国务院办公厅) and "Opinions on the implementation of the reform of decoupling the industrial associations, chambers of commerce and administrative agencies" (关于全面推开行业协会商会与行政机关脱钩改革的实施意见) published by the National Development and Reform Commission (国家发展改革委):

The sponsorship, supervisor, contact, and affiliation relationship between administrative agencies (including its subordinate units) and industry associations and chambers of commerce shall be canceled. The industry associations and chambers of commerce shall be directly registered and operate independently under the law, and no longer supervised by business supervisory units."
(取消行政机关（包括下属单位）与行业协会商会的主办、主管、联系和挂靠关系，行业协会商会依法直接登记、独立运行，不再设置业务主管单位。)

. That is, as an industrial association, the BNIA is not affiliated in any way with the government in law.

Based on those facts and legal regulations, I suppose the BNIA is neither a subsidiary department of their government nor an "official government agency". Therefore, the BNIA turns out not to be a qualified organization with the right to raise a takedown request on behalf of the government de jure or de facto.

Hi there,

I found a small typo in your README. Under the header contributing

[Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/github/site-policy-internal/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md_

should be,

[Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/github/site-policy-internal/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)

Hope you have a great day!

I have reason to believe that a user on your platform may be attempting to breach my license (see here).
As part of the royal family of Great Mojaveland, I request that you remove the offending content as soon as possible.

Failure to do so will result in any number of legal and/or private actions.

P.S. What is the proper way to submit these complaints in the future online?

To whom it may concern,
Royal Family of Great Mojaveland, a North American micronation