gemsciencetools / vmtk-vulnerability-modellers-toolkit Goto Github PK

Provide new users with short summaries and examples to use the different capabilities of the VMTK

https://github.com/GEMScienceTools/VMTK-Vulnerability-Modellers-ToolKit/wiki

Some icons and labels are not well fitted in the gui frame

Dear Sir
I was trying to run the Toolkit using a set of 6 pre-sorted csv files using the 'use all record' option in the Demand Module. But found no output in the output folder chosen. Can you please advice where I might be going wrong?
Thank you

Dear developer,

I want to use this tool.
I have seen the codes, and I have used the codes and the GUI.
In the first step, I tried to use the codes and GUI to get the results based on input data in the demo file.
Then I compared my results and the results in outputs of the demo file.
My fragility function results only covered the probability of exceedance of damage states for 0.01g to 1.44g for fragility_drift_PGA, and for the results of other IMs, this acceleration interval differed.
I need to know why this happens and how can I expand the X-Axis to get the results for 0.05g to 5g, according to the demo file??

Thanks in advance,
Zarrin

In the Structural Response Module, after uploading the csv file of Damping Ratio and a folder to take the output, when I am clicking on start in the GUI file, it is supposed to generate 2 files on maximum displacement and maximum acceleration respectively. But no files are being generated.

Hi!,

I hope you are doing well. I'm trying to use the conditional mean spectrum included in the VMTK. However, I'm experience the following issue (also please the attached file from the terminal). Could you please me some guidance to fix it?.

Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Users\ragop\miniconda3\envs\vulkits\lib\tkinter_init_.py", line 1892, in call
return self.func(*args)
File "C:\Users\ragop\Desktop\Non Structural Modelling\10._Vulnerabilitykit\GUI\Start_GUI.py", line 414, in
command=lambda:button_select_gmr(gmrs_location_folderPath_tk_var.get(),IM_tk_var.get(),radio_var.get(),out_demand_folderPath_tk_var.get(),no_gmrs_entry_tk_var.get(),max_scale_factor_entry_tk_var.get(),min_scale_factor_entry_tk_var.get(),imls_entry_tk_var.get(),hzd_disag_filePath_tk_var.get(),vs30_tk_var.get()),
File "C:\Users\ragop\Desktop\Non Structural Modelling\10._Vulnerabilitykit\GUI\Start_GUI.py", line 393, in button_select_gmr
IMs =csm.find_ground_motions(selectionParams,simulatedSpectra,IMs)
File "C:\Users\ragop\Desktop\Non Structural Modelling\10._Vulnerabilitykit\GUI\csm_implementation.py", line 476, in find_ground_motions
temp=np.min(err)
,min_scale_factor_entry_tk_var.get(),imls_entry_tk_var.get(),hzd_disag_filePath_tk_var.get(),vs30_tk_var.get()),
File "C:\Users\ragop\Desktop\Non Structural Modelling\10._Vulnerabilitykit\GUI\Start_GUI.py", line 393, in button_select_gmr
IMs =csm.find_ground_motions(selectionParams,simulatedSpectra,IMs)
File "C:\Users\ragop\Desktop\Non Structural Modelling\10._Vulnerabilitykit\GUI\csm_implementation.py", line 479, in find_ground_motions
temp=np.min(err)
File "<array_function internals>", line 200, in amin
File "C:\Users\ragop\miniconda3\envs\vulkits\lib\site-packages\numpy\core\fromnumeric.py", line 2946, in amin
return _wrapreduction(a, np.minimum, 'min', axis, None, out,
File "C:\Users\ragop\miniconda3\envs\vulkits\lib\site-packages\numpy\core\fromnumeric.py", line 86, in _wrapreduction
return ufunc.reduce(obj, axis, dtype, out, **passkwargs)
ValueError: zero-size array to reduction operation minimum which has no identity

If you need any additional information, I will happy to share.

Best,
Salvador

Dear all,

in the structural response module there is the possibility to use the energy option for the cyclic strength degradation or no degradation. If I use the results of both options to create the fragility functions with the next tab, I get higher values of the probability of exceedance at the damage states for the version without degradation than with degradation. I thought that through the degradation in stiffness and strength there would be a higher probability of exceedance?

Thanks for your answer in advance.