gelatodigital / automate Goto Github PK

Create an Ops Task Treasury that is congruent with the new gas savings diamond PrepaidExecFacet: https://github.com/gelatodigital/gelato-vanilla/issues/155

• new event LogDeductFees(address indexed user, address indexed executor, address indexed token, uint256 fees, address service)

• new useFunds function (maybe call it deductFees ) which simply deducts fees from users balance and emits event LogDeductFees

Task treasury names on fantom and matic are TaskTreasuryFantom & TaskTreasuryMatic

Hi everybody,

I am trying to write a resolver contract which can also a contract creator for several bots. I looked into your examples and noticed
that I need to inherit OpsTaskCreator.sol

So I tried to install your public gelatodigital/ops as node-modul via yarn add https://github.com/gelatodigital/ops.git
and I am getting this error:

error C:\Github\EasyPI-Contract\node_modules\gelato-ops: Command failed.
Exit code: 1
Command: yarn husky install
Arguments:
Directory: C:\Github\EasyPI-Contract\node_modules\gelato-ops
Output:

my yarn version is 1.22.19

when I try the same with npm install https://github.com/gelatodigital/ops.git
I get the error:

npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE
npm ERR! errno 1
npm ERR! [email protected] postinstall: `yarn husky install`
npm ERR! Exit status 1
npm ERR!
npm ERR! Failed at the [email protected] postinstall script.
npm ERR! This is probably not a problem with npm. There is likely additional logging output above.

my npn version is: 6.14.15

Is there a lib for the npm registry? If not, should I just dl the contracts and includ them manually?
Thanks for your help!

Deploy PokeMe smart contracts and verify them on:

• Avax
• Bsc
• Arbitrum

Instead of using signatures for task names consider the following:

Add a new parameter here:
https://github.com/gelatodigital/ops/blob/dd0d214bf59376ed771b5da036411f3cf6853081/contracts/Ops.sol#L50

string calldata name

And emit the name here:
https://github.com/gelatodigital/ops/blob/dd0d214bf59376ed771b5da036411f3cf6853081/contracts/Ops.sol#L206

then you can cheaply get all names for tasks, either by quickly querying events or by getting them through a subgraph

The Gelato Network Rinkeby address on the docs is incorrect:

It looks like the Ropsten address was accidentally listed for Rinkeby:

Confirmed 0xCc4CcD69D31F9FfDBD3BFfDe49c6aA886DaB98d9 is the Ropsten address:

If a function within a smart contract that a user wants to automate contains an onlyEOA modifier, Gelato wont work with it.

Lets try to scan a selected contracts source code that we receive from Etherscan for the respective function to see if there is a onlyEOA modifier present. If yes, we need to display a warning saying: "Please remove the onlyEOA modifier from your smart contracts to make it compatible with Gelato

What if I use proxy contracts for the contract to Poke/Automate?

I have a proxy contract that does delegate calls to an implementation/logic contract, if I use the address of the proxy contract in the Gelato Ops page it will therefore give me the functions for that proxy (the proxy is verified on etherscan so it gets its abi from there).

Is there a way to use a proxy contract on Gelato Ops?

For example:

struct Flags {
 bool isTimedTask,
 bool isFlashbots,
 ...
)

• Include links to PokeMe dependencies like PokeMeReady.sol in docs

hello there, heroes of defi.

i would like to automate the staking of my staking rewards (compounding) on moonbeam/GLMR.

here is the link to the staking contract: https://moonbeam.moonscan.io/address/0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000800#writeContract
(function 8: delegator_bond_more)

maybe make it possible to split the rewards up in 3 portions (20 tokens / 3) and stake 33% of the rewards on collator/node #1, 33% on collator/node #2, and 33% on collator/node #3. (i have spread my staked tokens over 3 collators/nodes for more stable returns/less randomness in rewards)

the problem is that im too n00b to figure out how to do it myself, and you guys have not yet gotten to the task of writing the code to do so.

i actually only write this to tell you that i think that everybody on moonbeam would appreciate it greatly if this function/service got added to the Gelato UI (https://app.gelato.network/) service/function list in a not so distant future :)

have a great summer frens 🥇

To Do:

• Allow NETWORK_TOKEN to be deposited to the TaskTreasury.sol by a simple transfer using a receive() external payable fallback function

Add an s to contract (contracts).

Smart contract

• Deploy IceCreamNFT
• Deploy Forwarder
• Deploy TaskTreasuryL2
• Deploy TaskTreasuryUpgradable
• Deploy Ops.sol
• Whitelist Ops on TaskTreasuryUpgradable
• Whitelist Ops on TaskTreasuryL2
• Whitelist TaskTreasuryUpgradable on TaskTreasuryL2
• Add deployed addresses to /hardhat/config/addresses

Subgraph

• Add configs to subgraph
• If network is a test net, add to function isTestnet()
• If network is a prod net, add Uni v2 router, USD and Wrapped native address
• Add name and ticker for native token in function getOrCreatePaymentToken()
• Deploy subgraph

Backend

• Add configs to backend
• If network is a test net, add to IS_TESTNET
• If network is a prod net, add wrapped native address
• Deploy backend

To address Parent / Child payment model, we could allow sponsorship on the TaskTreasury contract.

Workflow would be:

1. As a parent (ie Sponsor), I deposit funds on the TaskTreasury
2. As a parent, I sponsor my child contracts to use my funds on the TaskTreasury:

TaskTreasury.sponsorUser(child)

3. As a child, I can create tasks & their executions will be paid by my parent (ie Sponsor)

On a technical level, this would require changes only on the TaskTreasuryUpgradable contract:

• create a mapping sponsoredUsers = sponsor address => list of sponsored users address
• create a mapping userSponsor = user address => sponsor address
• implement methods sponsorUser() / removeSponsoredUser() to add / remove sponsored users for the current msg.sender
• on the useFunds method, check if the current _user (ie the task creator) has a sponsor and if so, use the sponsor balance instead of the user balance

Questions:

• what if multiple sponsor want to sponsor the same user ?
  • reject ? only one sponsor per user
  • replace ? only the last sponsor will sponsor the user
  • allow multiple ? need to handle a list of sponsors per user
• what if user is already having a balance ?
  • we could fallback to using the user balance if the sponsor is running out of fund?
  • or we could use user balance first and then lookup for sponsor