https://github.com/ga-group/iso10383 on the rigth side says "No description, website, or topics provided."

• add link to website
• add topics, eg: FpML MIC ISO10303 FIBO LEI Wikidata businessCenter stockExchange exchange

The only branch here is gh-pages rather than the commonly used master or main.
Unless you plan to turn this into a github.io website, I'd suggest you move to master.

These links in the README are broken:
"For ease of access the latest versions of the datasets can be downloaded here:

• https://github.com/ga-group/iso10383/blob/gh-pages/iso10383/MarketsIndividuals.ttl
• https://github.com/ga-group/iso10383/blob/gh-pages/iso10383/BusinessCentersIndividuals.ttl "

The correct link is https://github.com/ga-group/iso10383/blob/gh-pages/MarketsIndividuals.ttl

I added MIC to Wikidata. Last update was maybe 1y ago. Spent a lot of time on matching existing exchanges.
I think most items are ok, but I'm sure there are omissions and merges that still need to be done.

• Do you get your alignments skos:closeMatch wd:Qnnn directly from WD?
• Would you like to help with improving the situation in WD?
• Below is some info on ambiguous/duplicate codes, but I have a lot more files locally.
  • In particular, we need to check which current MIC codes are still missing from WD.
    A year ago they were COTC|ECHO|JSES|JSJX|LMEC|MIBG|NMRA|OTCN|TPSL|TSGI|XSWB|XZAP

MIC and Crunchbase Exchange IDs on Wikidata

Table of Contents

• MIC and Crunchbase Exchange IDs on Wikidata
  • MIC Codes
    • Duplicate MIC
    • Ambiguous MIC
  • Crunchbase Exchanges
    • Ambiguous Crunchbase Code
    • Duplicate Crunchbase Code
    • Crunchbase Without MIC

Results and counts as per 17-Aug-2022

MIC Codes

Duplicate MIC

Two MICs per exchange: https://w.wiki/5agv: 7

Ambiguous MIC

One MIC for two exchanges: https://w.wiki/5ah$ : 3 (now fixed all)

Crunchbase Exchanges

Out of 164 CB exchange codes.

Ambiguous Crunchbase Code

Same code for two exchanges: https://w.wiki/5aYS : 1

Duplicate Crunchbase Code

Two CB codes per exchange: https://w.wiki/5aYP : 8 (this is ok)

Crunchbase Without MIC

Crunchbase exchanges without MIC: https://w.wiki/5aYM : 13

You have this broken record in BusinessCentersIndividuals.ttl:

fibo-fbc-fct-bci:
	a	fibo-fnd-plc-loc:BusinessCenter ;
	a	owl:NamedIndividual ;
	dct:description	"the international business center of " ;
	lcc-cr:isPartOf	cc:BR , cc:ES , cc:EU , cc:GB , cc:IL , cc:NY , cc:US ;
	rdfs:label	"" .

• I guess it comes from some empty cell in download/business-center-latest.xml but I don't know where to download it from
• handling multivalued cells is a bit tricky in tarql, but I don't see where you do it? No afs:strSplit in FpML.tarql?

Btw, what is -cat in the makefile? I wonder about the minus sign

I'm comparing MarketsIndividuals.ttl to the official FIBO version.
(I've used https://gist.github.com/VladimirAlexiev/a4d9d715c5d079378384f3a30c8ce061 to convert FIBO to turtle)

You use fibo-fbc-fct-mkt:operatesInCountry cc:BM, they use lcc-3166-1:Bermuda

• It's better to use the same prefix lcc-3166-1: to avoid confusion
• You must use the FIBO country URLs, though it'd take a lookup table and is inconvenient.
• I raised the same problem in edmcouncil/fibo#1816 with @ElisaKendall
• I don't see owl:sameAs statements so this is quite mandatory

In ISO10383.tarql you use:

PREFIX tempo: <http://purl.org/tempo/>
tempo:validFrom
tempo:validTill

I looked at http://purl.org/tempo and it's a good ontology.

However, I'm pretty sure that FIBO has its own props to express the temporal validity of an identifier.
Right @ElisaKendall?

In BusinessCentersIndividuals-align.ttl you use a "private" LOCODE namespace, eg

@prefix un-loc: <http://data.ga-group.nl/un-locode/> .
... skos:closeMatch un-loc:DKAAB

However, UNCEFACT is already producing linked data (@kshychko , @onthebreeze, @nissimsan).

Eg in https://github.com/uncefact/codes-locode/blob/main/vocab/unlocode/ you can see:

• https://service.unece.org/trade/uncefact/vocabulary/unlocode/ADALV (Andorra la Vella)
• https://service.unece.org/trade/uncefact/vocabulary/unlocode-countries/AD (Andorra)

Please use those uncefact namespaces in your alignment.

Cheers!

In ISO10383.tarql you have this:

<MIC exchange/market>
		dbp:formerLabel	?NAME_INSTITUTION_DESCRIPTION ;
		dbp:formerName	?NAME_INSTITUTION_DESCRIPTION ;
		fibo-fbc-fct-mkt:hasExchangeName	?NAME_INSTITUTION_DESCRIPTION ;
		rdfs:label	?NAME_INSTITUTION_DESCRIPTION ;

<MIC code>
		rdfs:label	?_miclbl ;
		dbp:formerLabel	?_miclbl ;

• Why emit the same label as both current and "former"? Or is the idea that at some point "DELETED" entries will be left only with "former"?
• @ElisaKendall doesn't FIBO or LEI have a term for "former name"?
• dbp is not a very good namespace because it applies only to English dbpedia and signified a "raw" (unmapped) prop.
  • If you need to, use dbo:formerName (see http://mappings.dbpedia.org/index.php/OntologyProperty:FormerName)