A decoder that constructs objects from regular expression matches.
For more information about creating your own custom decoders, consult Chapter 7 of the Flight School Guide to Swift Codable. For more information about using regular expressions in Swift, check out Chapter 6 of the Flight School Guide to Swift Strings.
- Swift 5+
- iOS 11+ or macOS 10.13+
import RegularExpressionDecoder
let ticker = """
AAPL 170.69▲0.51
GOOG 1122.57▲2.41
AMZN 1621.48▼18.52
MSFT 106.57=0.00
SWIFT 5.0.0▲1.0.0
"""
let pattern: RegularExpressionPattern<Stock, Stock.CodingKeys> = #"""
\b
(?<\#(.symbol)>[A-Z]{1,4}) \s+
(?<\#(.price)>\d{1,}\.\d{2}) \s*
(?<\#(.sign)>([▲▼=])
(?<\#(.change)>\d{1,}\.\d{2})
\b
"""#
let decoder = try RegularExpressionDecoder<Stock>(
pattern: pattern,
options: .allowCommentsAndWhitespace
)
try decoder.decode([Stock].self, from: ticker)
// Decodes [AAPL, GOOG, AMZN, MSFT] (but not SWIFT, which is invalid)Let's say that you're building an app that parses stock quotes from a text-based stream of price changes.
let ticker = """
AAPL 170.69▲0.51
GOOG 1122.57▲2.41
AMZN 1621.48▼18.52
MSFT 106.57=0.00
"""Each stock is represented by the following structure:
- The symbol, consisting of 1 to 4 uppercase letters, followed by a space
- The price, formatted as a number with 2 decimal places
- A sign, indicating a price gain (
▲), loss (▼), or no change (=) - The magnitude of the gain or loss, formatted the same as the price
These format constraints lend themselves naturally to representation by a regular expression, such as:
/\b[A-Z]{1,4} \d{1,}\.\d{2}[▲▼=]\d{1,}\.\d{2}\b/Note: The
\bmetacharacter anchors matches to word boundaries.
This regular expression can distinguish between valid and invalid stock quotes.
"AAPL 170.69▲0.51" // valid
"SWIFT 5.0.0▲1.0.0" // invalidHowever, to extract individual components from a quote (symbol, price, etc.) the regular expression must contain capture groups, of which there are two varieties: positional capture groups and named capture groups.
Positional capture groups are demarcated in the pattern
by enclosing parentheses ((___)).
With some slight modifications,
we can make original regular expression capture each part of the stock quote:
/\b([A-Z]{1,4}) (\d{1,}\.\d{2})([▲▼=])(\d{1,}\.\d{2})\b/When matched, the symbol can be accessed by the first capture group, the price by the second, and so on.
For large numbers of capture groups ---
especially in patterns with nested groups ---
one can easily lose track of which parts correspond to which positions.
So another approach is to assign names to capture groups,
which are denoted by the syntax (?<NAME>___).
/\b
(?<symbol>[A-Z]{1,4}) \s+
(?<price>\d{1,}\.\d{2}) \s*
(?<sign>([▲▼=])
(?<change>\d{1,}\.\d{2})
\b/Note: Most regular expression engines --- including the one used by
NSRegularExpression--- provide a mode to ignore whitespace; this lets you segment long patterns over multiple lines, making them easier to read and understand.
Theoretically, this approach allows you to access each group by name
for each match of the regular expression.
In practice, doing this in Swift can be inconvenient,
as it requires you to interact with cumbersome NSRegularExpression APIs
and somehow incorporate it into your model layer.
RegularExpressionDecoder provides a convenient solution
to constructing Decodable objects from regular expression matches
by automatically matching coding keys to capture group names.
And it can do so safely,
thanks to the new ExpressibleByStringInterpolation protocol in Swift 5.
To understand how,
let's start by considering the following Stock model,
which adopts the Decodable protocol:
struct Stock: Decodable {
let symbol: String
var price: Double
enum Sign: String, Decodable {
case gain = "▲"
case unchanged = "="
case loss = "▼"
}
private var sign: Sign
private var change: Double = 0.0
var movement: Double {
switch sign {
case .gain: return +change
case .unchanged: return 0.0
case .loss: return -change
}
}
}So far, so good.
Now, normally, the Swift compiler
automatically synthesizes conformance to Decodable,
including a nested CodingKeys type.
But in order to make this next part work correctly,
we'll have to do this ourselves:
extension Stock {
enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
case symbol
case price
case sign
case change
}
}Here's where things get really interesting:
remember our regular expression with named capture patterns from before?
We can replace the hard-coded names
with interpolations of the Stock type's coding keys.
import RegularExpressionDecoder
let pattern: RegularExpressionPattern<Stock, Stock.CodingKeys> = #"""
\b
(?<\#(.symbol)>[A-Z]{1,4}) \s+
(?<\#(.price)>\d{1,}\.\d{2}) \s*
(?<\#(.sign)>[▲▼=])
(?<\#(.change)>\d{1,}\.\d{2})
\b
"""#Note: This example benefits greatly from another new feature in Swift 5: raw string literals. Those octothorps (
#) at the start and end tell the compiler to ignore escape characters (\) unless they also include an octothorp (\#( )). Using raw string literals, we can write regular expression metacharacters like\b,\d, and\swithout double escaping them (i.e.\\b).
Thanks to ExpressibleByStringInterpolation,
we can restrict interpolation segments to only accept those coding keys,
thereby ensuring a direct 1:1 match between capture groups
and their decoded properties.
And not only that ---
this approach lets us to verify that keys have valid regex-friendly names
and aren't captured more than once.
It's enormously powerful,
allowing code to be incredibly expressive
without compromising safety or performance.
When all is said and done,
RegularExpressionDecoder lets you decode types
from a string according to a regular expression pattern
much the same as you might from JSON or a property list
using a decoder:
let decoder = try RegularExpressionDecoder<Stock>(
pattern: pattern,
options: .allowCommentsAndWhitespace
)
try decoder.decode([Stock].self, from: ticker)
// Decodes [AAPL, GOOG, AMZN, MSFT]MIT
Mattt (@mattt)
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent