The Facebook Business SDK is a one-stop-shop to help our partners better serve their businesses. Partners are using multiple Facebook API's to serve the needs of their clients. Adopting all these API's and keeping them up to date across the various platforms can be time consuming and ultimately prohibitive. For this reason Facebook has developed the Business SDK bundling many of its APIs into one SDK to ease implementation and upkeep. The Business SDK is an upgraded version of the Marketing API SDK that includes the Marketing API as well as many Facebook APIs from different platforms such as Pages, Business Manager, Instagram, etc.
Business SDK Getting Started Guide
Python is currently the most popular language for our third-party developers. facebook_business
is a Python package that provides an interface between your Python application and Facebook's APIs within the Business SDK. This tutorial covers the basic knowledge needed to use the SDK and provides some exercises for the reader.
NOTE: facebook_business
package is compatible with Python 2 and 3!
To get started with the SDK, you must have an app registered on developers.facebook.com.
To manage the Marketing API, please visit your App Dashboard and add the Marketing API product to your app.
IMPORTANT: For security, it is recommended that you turn on 'App Secret Proof for Server API calls' in your app's Settings->Advanced page.
When someone connects with an app using Facebook Login and approves the request for permissions, the app obtains an access token that provides temporary, secure access to Facebook APIs.
An access token is an opaque string that identifies a User, app, or Page.
For example, to access the Marketing API, you need to generate a user access token
for your app and ask for the ads_management
permission; to access Pages API,
you need to generate a Page access token for your app and ask for the manage_page
permission.
Refer to our Access Token Guide to learn more.
For now, we can use the Graph Explorer to get an access token.
The easiest way to install the SDK is via pip
in your shell.
NOTE: For Python 3, use pip3
and python3
instead.
NOTE: Use sudo
if any of these complain about permissions. (This might
happen if you are using a system installed Python.)
If you don't have pip:
easy_install pip
Now execute when you have pip:
pip install facebook_business
If you care for the latest version instead of a possibly outdated version in the pypi.python.org repository, check out the repository from GitHub or download a release tarball. Once you've got the package downloaded and unzipped, install it:
python setup.py install
Great, now you are ready to use the SDK!
Create a test.py file with the contents below (assuming your system is using python 2.7 and installed under /opt/homebrew. Update to your proper python location.):
import sys
sys.path.append('/opt/homebrew/lib/python2.7/site-packages') # Replace this with the place you installed facebookads using pip
sys.path.append('/opt/homebrew/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebook_business-3.0.0-py2.7.egg-info') # same as above
from facebook_business.api import FacebookAdsApi
from facebook_business.adobjects.adaccount import AdAccount
my_app_id = 'your-app-id'
my_app_secret = 'your-appsecret'
my_access_token = 'your-page-access-token'
FacebookAdsApi.init(my_app_id, my_app_secret, my_access_token)
my_account = AdAccount('act_<your-adaccount-id>')
campaigns = my_account.get_campaigns()
print(campaigns)
Test your install with the following command:
python test.py
You should see the result in your terminal window. If it complains about an expired token, repeat the process for requesting a Page Access Token described in the prerequisites section above.
NOTE: We shall use the objects module throughout the rest of the tutorial. You can also use the individual class files under adobjects directly.
The SDK implements a CRUD (create, read, update, delete) design. Objects relevant to exploring the graph are located in the objects module of the facebook_business package.
All objects on the graph are instances of AbstractObject
. Some objects can
be directly queried and thus are instances of AbstractCrudObject
(a subclass
of AbstractObject
). Both these abstract classes are located in
facebook_business.adobjects
.
There is and additional folder adobjects
under facebook_business. Under this you will see a file for every ad object
in our Marketing API. These files are autogenerated from our API and therefore
are close in parity with what API has to offer. Based on what CRUD operations can be
performed on each object, you will see the presence of the following methods in them:
api_get
api_update
api_delete
create_xxx
get_xxx
For example, Campaign has all these methods but AdAccount does not. Read the Marketing API documentation for more information about how different ad objects are used.
There are some deprecated function in AbstractCrudObject
, like
remote_create
remote_read
remote_update
remote_delete
Please try to stop use them since we may plan to deprecated them soon.
The way the SDK abstracts the API is by defining classes that represent objects
on the graph. These class definitions and their helpers are located in
facebook_business.adobjects
.
Look at AbstractObject
's and AbstractCrudObject
's __init__
method
for more information. Most objects on the graph subclass from one of the two.
When instantiating an ad object, you can specify its id if it already exists by
defining fbid
argument. Also, if you want to interact with the
API using a specific api object instead of the default, you can specify the
api
argument.
Look at the methods of an object to see what associations over which we can
iterate. For example an User
object has a method get_ad_accounts
which
returns an iterator of AdAccount
objects.
Most ad-related operations are in the context of an ad account. You can go to Ads Manager to see accounts for which you have permission. Most of you probably have a personal account.
Let's get all the ad accounts for the user with the given access token. I only have one account so the following is printed:
>>> from facebook_business.adobjects.user import User
>>> me = adobjects.User(fbid='me')
>>> my_accounts = list(me.get_ad_accounts())
>>> print(my_accounts)
[{ 'account_id': u'17842443', 'id': u'act_17842443'}]
>>> type(my_accounts[0])
<class 'facebook_business.adobjects.AdAccount'>
WARNING: We do not specify a keyword argument api=api
when instantiating
the User
object here because we've already set the default api when
bootstrapping.
NOTE: We wrap the return value of get_ad_accounts
with list()
because get_ad_accounts
returns an EdgeIterator
object (located in
facebook_business.adobjects
) and we want to get the full list right away instead of
having the iterator lazily loading accounts.
For our purposes, we can just pick an account and do our experiments in its context:
>>> my_account = my_accounts[0]
Or if you already know your account id:
>>> my_account = adobjects.AdAccount('act_17842443')
Let's create a campaign. It's in the context of the account, i.e. its parent should be the account.
fields = [
]
params = {
adobjects.Campaign.Field.name : 'Conversions Campaign',
adobjects.Campaign.Field.configured_status: adobjects.Campaign.Status.paused,
}
campaign = AdAccount(id).create_campaign(fields, params)
Then we specify some details about the campaign. To figure out what properties
to define, you should look at the available fields of the object (located in
Campaign.Field
) and also look at the ad object's documentation (e.g.
Campaign).
NOTE: To find out the fields, look at the individual class file under adobjects directory.
If there's an error, an exception will be raised. Possible exceptions and their
descriptions are listed in facebook_business.exceptions
.
We can also read properties of an object from the api assuming that the object
is already created and has a node path. Accessing properties of an object is
simple since AbstractObject
implements the collections.MutableMapping
.
You can access them just like accessing a key of a dictionary:
>>> print(my_account)
{'account_id': u'17842443', 'id': u'act_17842443'}
>>> my_account = my_account.api_get(fields=[adobjects.AdAccount.Field.amount_spent])
>>> print(my_account[adobjects.AdAccount.Field.amount_spent])
{'amount_spent': 21167, 'account_id': u'17842443', 'id': u'act_17842443'}
To update an object, we can modify its properties and then call the
api_update
method to sync the object with the server. Let's correct the
typo "Campain" to "Campaign":
>>> campaign.api_update(fields=[], params={adobjects.Campaign.Field.name:"Potato Campaign"})
You can see the results in ads manager.
If we decide we don't want the campaign we created anymore:
campaign.api_delete()
Throughout the docs, the method FacebookAdsApi.init is called before making any API calls. This method set up a default FacebookAdsApi object to be used everywhere. That simplifies the usage but it's not feasible when a system using the SDK will make calls on behalf of multiple users.
The reason why this is not feasible is because each user should have its own FacebookSession, with its own access token, rather than using the same session for every one. Each session should be used to create a separate FacebookAdsApi object. See example below:
my_app_id = '<APP_ID>'
my_app_secret = '<APP_SECRET>'
my_access_token_1 = '<ACCESS_TOKEN_1>'
my_access_token_2 = '<ACCESS_TOKEN_2>'
proxies = {'http': '<HTTP_PROXY>', 'https': '<HTTPS_PROXY>'} # add proxies if needed
session1 = FacebookSession(
my_app_id,
my_app_secret,
my_access_token_1,
proxies,
)
session2 = FacebookSession(
my_app_id,
my_app_secret,
my_access_token_2,
proxies,
)
api1 = FacebookAdsApi(session1)
api2 = FacebookAdsApi(session2)
In the SDK examples, we always set a single FacebookAdsApi object as the default one. However, working with multiples access_tokens, require us to use multiples apis. We may set a default api for a user, but, for the other users, we shall use its the api object as a param. In the example below, we create two AdUsers, the first one using the default api and the second one using its api object:
FacebookAdsApi.set_default_api(api1)
me1 = AdUser(fbid='me')
me2 = AdUser(fbid='me', api=api2)
Another way to create the same objects from above would be:
me1 = AdUser(fbid='me', api=api1)
me2 = AdUser(fbid='me', api=api2)
From here, all the following workflow for these objects remains the same. The only exceptions are the classmethods calls, where we now should pass the api we want to use as the last parameter on every call. For instance, a call to the Aduser.get_by_ids method should be like this:
session = FacebookSession(
my_app_id,
my_app_secret,
my_access_token_1,
proxies,
)
api = FacebookAdsApi(session1)
Aduser.get_by_ids(ids=['<UID_1>', '<UID_2>'], api=api)
All CRUD calls support a params
keyword argument which takes a dictionary
mapping parameter names to values in case advanced modification is required. You
can find the list of parameter names as attributes of
{your object class}.Field
. Under the Field class there may be other classes
which contain, as attributes, valid fields of the value of one of the parent
properties.
api_update
and create_xxx
support a files
keyword argument
which takes a dictionary mapping file reference names to binary opened file
objects.
api_get
supports a fields
keyword argument which is a convenient way
of specifying the 'fields' parameter. fields
takes a list of fields which
should be read during the call. The valid fields can be found as attributes of
the class Field.
When initializing an EdgeIterator
or when calling a method such as
AdAccount.get_ad_campaigns
:
- You can specify a
fields
argument which takes a list of fields to read for the objects being read. - You can specify a
params
argument that can help you specify or filter the edge more precisely.
It is efficient to group together large numbers of calls into one http request.
The SDK makes this process simple. You can group together calls into an instance
of FacebookAdsApiBatch
(available in facebook_business.api). To easily get one
for your api instance:
my_api_batch = api.new_batch()
Calls can be added to the batch instead of being executed immediately:
campaign.api_delete(batch=my_api_batch)
Once you're finished adding calls to the batch, you can send off the request:
my_api_batch.execute()
Please follow batch call guidelines in the Marketing API documentation. There are optimal numbers of calls per batch. In addition, you may need to watch out that for rate limiting as a batch call simply improves network performance and each call does count individually towards rate limiting.
See facebook_business.exceptions
for a list of exceptions which may be thrown by
the SDK.
The unit tests don't require an access token or network access. Run them with your default installed Python as follows:
python -m facebook_business.test.unit
You can also use tox to run the unit tests with multiple Python versions:
sudo apt-get install python-tox # Debian/Ubuntu
sudo yum install python-tox # Fedora
tox --skip-missing-interpreters
You can increase interpreter coverage by installing additional versions of
Python. On Ubuntu you can use the
deadsnakes PPA.
On other distributions you can
build from source and then use
sudo make altinstall
to avoid conflicts with your system-installed
version.
Examples of usage are located in the examples/
folder.
If this SDK is not working as expected, it may be either a SDK issue or API issue.
This can be identified by constructing a raw cURL request and seeing if the response is as expected
for example:
from facebook_business.adobjects.page import Page
from facebook_business.api import FacebookAdsApi
FacebookAdsApi.init(access_token=access_token, debug=True)
page = Page(page_id).api_get(fields=fields,params=params)
When running this code, this cURL request will be printed to the console as:
curl -X 'GET' -H 'Accept: */*' -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate' -H 'Connection: keep-alive' -H 'User-Agent: fbbizsdk-python-v3.3.1' 'https://graph.facebook.com/v3.3/<pageid>/?access_token=<access_token>&fields=name%2Cbirthday%2Cphone'
Our SDK is autogenerated from SDK Codegen. If you want to learn more about how our SDK code is generated, please check this repository.
Since we want to handle bugs more efficiently, we've decided to close issue reporting in Github and move to our dedicated bug reporting channel. If you encounter a bug with Business SDK (Python), please report the issue at our developer bug reporting channel.
Facebook Business SDK for Python is licensed under the LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
facebook-python-business-sdk's People
Forkers
tony amitmnnit ohms4tehpuur prabeesh gjtsusi ebzlo djgoku alonsogodinez jfeng3 kihon10 alandbarroso gabrielvb agriffis abendleiter mvanveen jinyoyyo cwhsiao amyweiner-udemy wangqi pablovianini sthapaun semanticsugar phzhou meg2208 m-vdb colorsof mjehanzeb txdywy simonkreienbaum georgefs cscanlin barcadam alexstrat rushellphoto brian-clariture work4labs simudream dhruvbird khmerbelt rumantick lklyc thiagocmoraes bh4nuc0der flagshippromotions purshottamkb evzdrop lucasrcosta yuji0602 chendong0444 utpal6010 cfx-gspos parkjiminy nunofernandes-plight thunderstorm01777 arrmac arkanae seubert mouhidine vantageanalytics pixability joeagajanian 1234- miratrix naoyak asaoka-yoko djkonro scottydelta erlichmen chrisguidry sara62 rajanand23 cheefsteef nguyenvietson doanhnghieptunhanhungthinh jessicastewart-adroll king210876 pkdevboxy zcourts dvincelli hockeybuggy libraryfly xsleonard lucemia yaoyuan0801 dnzengou skacper mmoeller ddd-malay upjohnc scottanderson42 faldoau sobrr blackstar58 chaoduan2014 versionbeathon lensraster karnstrand yash-gamooga yuriybash five-hundred-elevenfacebook-python-business-sdk's Issues
Custom Audiences Example Bug
In examples/custom_audience_utils.py line 103
r = audience.add_users(schema, data)
The function add_users()
requires an app_id
parameter as implemented in facebookads/objects.py
.
Is there any plan to setup integration tests?
Today we encountered a business-critic issue related to our use of this SDK (see #49).
We're thinking of implementing scripts that would test that this SDK works as expected. Also, I was wondering if you have integration tests. I'm willing to contribute to those if needed. Just say the words :)
Batch remote creation does not properly encode NoneType in id field
When adding a remote_create call to a batch an error occurs where the None value for id cannot be properly quoted by urllib.parse.quote
. At this point in the add
call the params should already be valid JSON thanks to _top_level_param_json_encode
. Unfortunately, this function only attempts to apply json.dumps
to a value if it is an instance of collections.Mapping
, collections.Sequence
, or bool
and is not an instance of six.string_types
. None
evades this conditional and is left unmodified in the parameters leaving it to fail when it is passed later as a parameter.
remote_read with batch, response after execute is missing the requested fields.
Assume s,t are AdGroup objects with valid id's already set and that b is a FacebookAdsApiBatch object.
Without using batch:
s.remote_read(fields=[AdGroup.Field.name, AdGroup.Field.campaign_id])
t.remote_read(fields=[AdGroup.Field.name, AdGroup.Field.campaign_id])
both s,t now contains the fields name and campaign_id, however if the call is made in this way instead:
s.remote_read(fields=[AdGroup.Field.name, AdGroup.Field.campaign_id], batch=b)
t.remote_read(fields=[AdGroup.Field.name, AdGroup.Field.campaign_id], batch=b)
b.execute()
The name and campaign_id fields are not set, the response bodies from the server only has the 'id' value set.
KeyError: 'blame_field_specs'
While creating adsets using batch
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./manage.py", line 32, in <module>
execute_from_command_line(sys.argv)
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 399, in execute_from_command_line
utility.execute()
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 392, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 242, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 285, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
File "/home/web/work4us/python/sjp_app/management/commands/push_sjp_ads_campaign_csv.py", line 49, in handle
adsets = self.create_adsets(campaign, adsets_data)
File "/home/web/work4us/python/sjp_app/management/commands/push_sjp_ads_campaign_csv.py", line 74, in create_adsets
batch.execute()
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/api.py", line 439, in execute
self._failure_callbacks[index](inner_fb_response)
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/objects.py", line 500, in callback_failure
failure(response)
File "/home/web/work4us/python/ads_app/api/utils.py", line 24, in failure_default_batch_callback
raise response.error()
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/api.py", line 111, in error
self.body()
File "/home/web/work4us/venv/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/exceptions.py", line 75, in __init__
self._error['error_data']['blame_field_specs']
KeyError: 'blame_field_specs'
the actual error was:
{u'error': {u'is_transient': False, u'error_subcode': 1487478, u'error_user_title': u'Invalid Geo Locations', u'error_data': {u'blame_field': u'targeting'}, u'error_user_msg': u'Invalid Geo Locations', u'code': 100, u'message': u'Invalid parameter', u'type': u'FacebookApiException'}}
batch remote-create error because of id=None
Hi guys,
Thanks a lot for making this, but I meet one error when do batch remote_create of campaign/adset/ads and I am not sure whether it's a mistake.
My code like:
api_batch = api.new_batch()
// def callback function
campaign.update({
AdCampaign.Field.name: 'Seattle Ad Campaign',
AdCampaign.Field.objective: AdCampaign.Objective.website_clicks,
AdCampaign.Field.status: AdCampaign.Status.paused,
})
campaign.remote_create(batch=api_batch,success=callback_success,failure=callback_failure)
api.execute()
And it raises error like:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "create_ad.py", line 164, in <module>
campaign.remote_create(batch=api_batch,success=callback_success,failure=callback_failure)
File "/home/chutong/fb_api_test/facebookads/objects.py", line 529, in remote_create
failure=callback_failure,
File "/home/chutong/fb_api_test/facebookads/api.py", line 373, in add
keyvals.append("%s=%s" % (key, urllib.parse.quote(params[key])))
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/urllib.py", line 1225, in quote
raise TypeError('None object cannot be quoted')
TypeError: None object cannot be quoted
The reason is in
for key in params:
keyvals.append("%s=%s" % (key, urllib.parse.quote(params[key])))
params contains key='id' which has value None, it couldn't be treated as string here.
Should a judgement for value added here or do I make a wrong usage of batch remote create here?
Thanks for your help.
How to call custom urls and read data with exception handling?
example
read existing product sets with field names
http://graph.facebook.com/{product_catalogue_id}/product_sets?fields=product_count,name
iterate_edge infinite loading
Hi there,
I'm encountering some issues with the following code:
def __next__(self):
# Load next page at end.
# If load_next_page returns False, raise StopIteration exception
if not self._queue and not self.load_next_page():
raise StopIteration()
return self._queue.pop(0)
Notice the self.load_next_page()
. This is cool for scripting, because people have time to wait until the N HTTP requests are over. But I'm using this in production environment in one of our APIs. And infinite loading does not play well with cloudflare timeout. I know this is particular to my setup but I really feel like I might not be the only one encountering that problem. I manage to circumvent this by overriding the iterate_edge
methods of my objects and passing a custom EdgeIterator
that does not load the next page systematically. Instead, I call manually load_next_page()
when needed.
I understand that you cannot change your code API only for one user, but would you consider adding a parameter (for instance infinite_loading
) True
by default (or False
if you really like the spirit!) that would control this behaviour?
If you're interested, I can provide a PR quickly, with a proof of concept :)
Cheers
ReportStats Asynchronous Query
There is currently no straightforward way to fetch Ad Report Stats through asynchronous queries. get_report_stats
in AdAccount
only allows direct GET
requests. And most historical data is not accessible through it, returning error 1487535. Will this be implemented in the future?
Batch AdImage remote creation raises I/O exception.
When calling AdImage().remote_create(batch=batch); batch.execute()
the exception ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
is raised.
When using the AdImage().remote_create()
I found that this worked as intended and the AdImage object was returned with an 'id' and 'hash', but when attempting to do this while using a batch I ran into the I/O exception.
When looking into a possible fix for this, I tried looking at the AdImage's remote_create function (line number 1366 for me) and noticed that open_file
was being closed before the batch could be executed. Commenting out the line that closed the file for the sake of testing made the call complete but an error response {u'error': {u'message': u'File <IMG_PATH> has not been attached', u'type': u'GraphBatchException'}}
was returned.
Here is the script I started with:
from facebookads import FacebookSession, FacebookAdsApi
from facebookads.objects import AdAccount, AdImage
APP_ID= "<APP_ID>"
APP_SECRET = "<APP_SECRET>"
ACCESS_TOKEN="<ACCESS_TOKEN"
IMG_PATH= "<IMG PATH>"
session = FacebookSession(APP_ID, APP_SECRET, ACCESS_TOKEN)
api = FacebookAdsApi(session)
FacebookAdsApi.set_default_api(api)
account = AdAccount.get_my_account()
img = AdImage(parent_id=account.get_id_assured())
img[AdImage.Field.filename] = IMG_PATH
batch = account.get_api_assured().new_batch()
img.remote_create(batch=batch)
batch.execute()
Here is the stack trace that was outputted:
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/api.py", line 416, in execute
files=files,
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/api.py", line 270, in call
files=files,
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/virtualenvs/adroll/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 443, in request
prep = self.prepare_request(req)
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/virtualenvs/adroll/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/sessions.py", line 374, in prepare_request
hooks=merge_hooks(request.hooks, self.hooks),
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/virtualenvs/adroll/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/models.py", line 307, in prepare
self.prepare_body(data, files, json)
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/virtualenvs/adroll/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/models.py", line 449, in prepare_body
(body, content_type) = self._encode_files(files, data)
File "/Users/nilesnelson/projects/virtualenvs/adroll/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/models.py", line 152, in _encode_files
rf = RequestField(name=k, data=fp.read(),
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
Here is a test for integration.py that should do the same thing as the script:
class AdImageBatchTestCase(FacebookAdsTestCase):
def setup_ad_image(self):
img = objects.AdImage(
parent_id=self.TEST_ACCOUNT.get_id_assured(),
)
self.delete_in_teardown(img)
img[objects.AdImage.Field.filename] = self.TEST_IMAGE_PATH
return img
def test_batch_create_ad_image(self):
img = self.create_ad_image()
batch = FacebookAdsTestCase.TEST_API.new_batch()
img.remote_create(batch=batch)
batch.execute()
self.assertNotEquals(img['id'], None)
LookalikeAudience Field don't have id
I can't create a LookalikeAudience:
lookalike = LookalikeAudience(parent_id=self.ad_account_id)
It has a error "type object 'Field' has no attribute 'id". In your API, class LookalikeAudience don't have id in the Field class. Is this a bug?
AdUser.get_ad_account doesn't flow api instance to AdAccount
When I create an AdUser
with a specific api instance and then call get_ad_account
on that instance the api instance does not flow to the created AdAccount
.
Here is a test case that reproduces this issue:
app_id = config['app_id']
app_secret = config['app_secret']
access_token = config['access_token']
def test_get_ad_account_from_ad_user():
assert FacebookAdsApi.get_default_api() == None # Ensure the default api is not set
session = FacebookSession(
app_id,
app_secret,
connection.access_token,
)
api = FacebookAdsApi(session)
me = AdUser(fbid='me', api=api)
ad_account = me.get_ad_account()
assert ad_account.get_api() == api
Unable get ad accounts
When I get my ad accounts, it throw a exceptions "AttributeError: 'unicode' object has no attribute 'get'".
File "/app/services/ads/facebook.py", line 1016, in
FacebookAPI = FacebookAds(my_app_id, my_app_secret, my_access_token)
File "/app/services/ads/facebook.py", line 51, in init
self.my_accounts = list(me.get_ad_accounts())
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/objects.py", line 797, in get_ad_accounts
return self.iterate_edge(AdAccount, fields, params)
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/objects.py", line 745, in iterate_edge
params=params
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/objects.py", line 94, in init
self.load_next_page()
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/objects.py", line 137, in load_next_page
params=self._params,
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/api.py", line 307, in call
raise fb_response.error()
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/api.py", line 117, in error
self.body()
File "/app/.heroku/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/facebookads/exceptions.py", line 76, in init
if self._error.get('error_data', {}).get('blame_field_specs'):
AttributeError: 'unicode' object has no attribute 'get'
AdAccount.get_report_stats(params, async=True)
It doesn't look like this was implemented until v2.4, but it is deprecated in v2.4 on the server-side. It exists in the documentation for v2.3, but it's not in any of the code as far as I can tell (please let me know if it is). It is in the docs for v2.4 too, but the calls are deprecated on the server side and fail! FML.
It looks like a backport would need at least AdAccount.iterage_edge_async and objects.AsyncJob.
Is there a chance we can get this backported to v2.3? I can help. Are there any huge gotchas that make such a backport difficult?
Sucks that it's in the docs, but doesn't work anywhere. Seems like v2.3 is the best shot at providing a workaround. Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
SSL Warning in Python 2.7.9
I am getting a warning I have never seen before when creating an audience in SDK version 2.3.1, Python version 2.7.9:
InsecurePlatformWarning: A true SSLContext object is not available. This prevents urllib3 from configuring SSL appropriately and may cause certain SSL connections to fail. For more information, see https://urllib3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/security.html#insecureplatformwarning.
After reading through the link, it appears that this is related to an incompatibility with urllib3 and Python 2.7.
Is there actually a security hole here or is this just an overly-cautious warning?
Allow CustomAudiences to upload pre-hashed email addresses
Currently you are unable to upload pre-hashed SHA-256 hashes since the add_user function does the hashing automatically. There should be an option or logic implemented to upload emails that are already hashed
Insights: "roas is not valid for fields param"
This bug was validated in the Ads API v2.4 Q&A:
https://www.facebook.com/events/873155332753388/878318465570408/
Reposting this here for better issue tracking
Custom Audiences --list request does not work
The URL displayed in the executing command shell is
"https://grap.facebook.com/v2.4/ [id of adaccount]/customaudiences"
while in the actual Graph Explorer on the FB website it is
"https://grap.facebook.com/v2.4/ act_ [id of adaccount]/customaudiences"
I get a "Call was not successful"/ "Unsupported get request" message, Status 400.
Rename Ads API to Marketing API on documentation
And update its links.
EdgeIterator._total_count is not always set and can be VERY misleading
see those lines https://github.com/facebook/facebook-python-ads-sdk/blob/master/facebookads/objects.py#L146-L147. We expected it to be set every time, and we used the total()
method that returns None
, which is really bad because it silently tells that there is no stats. Instead:
- could we make sure we retrieve the total_count in every situation?
- if not possible, can we raise an
Exception
so that we do not fail silently?
I can come up with a PR if you want
How filter results of get_insights?
I cannot find problem with my code.
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function
from facebookads.api import FacebookAdsApi
from facebookads import objects
from pprint import pprint
FacebookAdsApi.init(app_id, app_secret,
access_token)
me = objects.AdUser(fbid='me')
for account in me.get_ad_accounts():
for i in account.get_insights(fields=[
objects.Insights.Field.spend,
objects.Insights.Field.campaign_name,
objects.Insights.Field.campaign_id,
], params={'date_preset': 'last_7_days', 'level': 'campaign', 'filtering':
[
{
'field': 'campaign_name',
'operator': 'CONTAIN',
'value': 'hrooom-brooom',
},
{
'field': 'spend',
'operator': 'GREATER_THAN',
'value': 0,
},
]
}):
pprint(i)
i try filter campaigns by part campaign_name (its postfix in real), but returns all campaigns of account. Where is my mistake?
KeyError when trying to read an error
Backtrace:
File ".../facebookads/api.py", line 117, in error
self.body()
File ".../facebookads/exceptions.py", line 99, in __init__
KeyError: 'path'
Looks like the error is located here. The request_context
, i.e. error._call
has no key "path".
I got this on version 2.3.3
and using a batch query. Looks like this https://github.com/facebook/facebook-python-ads-sdk/blob/2.4.2/facebookads/api.py#L387-L407
is the problem (I don't see a path
key)
Tests failing in clean_id
$ python -m facebookads.test.integration
.EEEEE..E
======================================================================
ERROR: runTest (__main__.AdCampaignTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 269, in runTest
self.assert_can_delete(self.subject)
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 192, in assert_can_delete
subject.remote_delete()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 709, in remote_delete
self.clear_id()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 448, in clear_id
del self[self.__class__.Field.id]
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 319, in __delitem__
del self._changes[key]
KeyError: 'id'
======================================================================
ERROR: runTest (__main__.AdGroupTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 359, in tearDown
self.ad_set.remote_delete()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 709, in remote_delete
self.clear_id()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 448, in clear_id
del self[self.__class__.Field.id]
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 319, in __delitem__
del self._changes[key]
KeyError: 'id'
======================================================================
ERROR: runTest (__main__.AdSetTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 301, in runTest
self.assert_can_delete(self.subject)
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 192, in assert_can_delete
subject.remote_delete()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 709, in remote_delete
self.clear_id()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 448, in clear_id
del self[self.__class__.Field.id]
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 319, in __delitem__
del self._changes[key]
KeyError: 'id'
======================================================================
ERROR: runTest (__main__.AdSetTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 311, in tearDown
self.campaign.remote_delete()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 709, in remote_delete
self.clear_id()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 448, in clear_id
del self[self.__class__.Field.id]
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 319, in __delitem__
del self._changes[key]
KeyError: 'id'
======================================================================
ERROR: runTest (__main__.MultiProductAdObjectStorySpecTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 435, in runTest
self.assert_can_delete(creative)
File "/home/aron/src/pp/facebook-python-ads-sdk/facebookads/test/integration.py", line 192, in assert_can_delete
subject.remote_delete()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 709, in remote_delete
self.clear_id()
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 448, in clear_id
del self[self.__class__.Field.id]
File "facebookads/objects.py", line 319, in __delitem__
del self._changes[key]
KeyError: 'id'
Checking prefix 'act_' for parent_id.
from facebookads import FacebookAdsApi
from facebookads.objects import CustomAudience
my_app_id = <APP_ID>
my_app_secret = '<APP_SECRET>'
my_access_token = '<ACCESS_TOKEN>'
FacebookAdsApi.init(my_app_id, my_app_secret, my_access_token)
AD_ACCOUNT_ID = 1431453467646932
audience = CustomAudience(parent_id='{}'.format(AD_ACCOUNT_ID))
audience.update({
CustomAudience.Field.name: 'someName',
CustomAudience.Field.subtype: CustomAudience.Subtype.custom,
})
audience.remote_create()
When I ran this code it throws an error. But when I change the value of parent_id to 'act_{}'.format(AD_ACCOUNT_ID)'
, the code ran without error. Is this by design or a bug?
I would suggest that there is a check for parent_id whether it has prefix 'act_' or not.
Supporting Graph API outside of Ads
I know this probably connects to the Graph API for Ads data. But I was wondering if there are plans to allow to connecting to endpoints like these:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/reference/v2.2
AttributeError: type object 'AdCampaign' has no attribute 'Preset'
The sample code not working
from facebookads.objects import AdCampaign
campaign = AdCampaign('<AD_CAMPAIGN_ID>')
params = {
'date_preset': AdCampaign.Preset.last_7_days,
}
insights = campaign.get_insights(params=params)
print insights
Update Docsmith link
According to this https://github.com/facebook/facebook-python-ads-sdk/tree/master/examples/docs , it's possible to generate documentation through a tool called "DocSmith". Unfortunately, the link (https://our.intern.facebook.com/intern/wiki/Solutions_Engineering/Devsite_Dynamic_Doc_Code_Blocks) doesn't seem to point at anything anymore. Would love to see what DocSmith does since googling "Facebook DocSmith" gives me a list of people named "Doc Smith".
No module named utils
pip install facebookads
Successfully installed facebookads-2.4.0
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "demo_cpa.py", line 6, in
from facebookads import FacebookSession
File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/facebookads/init.py", line 22, in
from facebookads.api import FacebookAdsApi
File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/facebookads/api.py", line 30, in
from facebookads.utils import urls
ImportError: No module named utils
filename param for AdImage
filename
is definitely a string containing path and name. But sometimes it would be useful passing just a file-like object because we have the file only in memory. We could modify the methods to process also file object but the parameter's name is still filename
. So it could be misleading.
Any suggestion?
missing facebookads.utils in setup.py
I think is necessary to add facebook.utils in setup.py to PACKAGES
PACKAGES = ['facebookads', 'facebookads.test', 'facebookads.utils']
Cannot create AdLabel on AdCreative
Nowhere in the API documentation is mentioned the fact that it is possible to add labels on creatives. So I think you code should be updated and remove the HasAdLabel
mixin inheritance from the AdCreative
class here. If I'm mistaken, your API doc should be updated...
Got the following error:
in call raise fb_response.error() FacebookRequestError: Message: Call was not successful Method: GET Path: https://graph.facebook.com/v2.4/6034071669641/adlabels Params: {'summary': 'true'} Status: 400 Response: { "error": { "message": "(#100) Invalid edge (adlabels) on node type (AdCreative)", "code": 100, "type": "OAuthException", "fbtrace_id": "DElUVn10w2E" } }
Reading all Ad Group Stats for an Ad Account using Batches
I am not sure if batching will help with my problem, but I need to start from the beginning of a Campaign and process all Ad Group Stats per day. After processing 1-2 months I hit the rate limit. I would like to try batching to see if that would help with this issue.
There isn't an example of batching and using remote_read().
I know what I need to do: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/ads-api/batch-requests/#adstatistics
Website Custom Audience Creation fails
Creating a WCA is failing because pixel_id is not listed as a field.
Adding the text:
pixel_id = 'pixel_id'
Under:
class CustomAudience(AbstractCrudObject):
class Field(object):
fixes this problem
Edit:
Pull Request here: #43
Optionally remove use of appsecret_proof
Is there any chance you think it would be a good idea to make the use of appsecret_proof optional? It fails for me every time I try to create a session with it. Obviously works fine if I remove it.
https://github.com/facebook/facebook-python-ads-sdk/blob/master/facebookads/session.py#L66
Thank you,
Freddy
start_time / end_time invalid for fetching stats in hour level
I have one question that really confused me about statistics.
When I try to fetch stats in [start_time, end_time] recently, like below:
account = AdAccount("act_<ACT_ID>")
params = {
'adgroup_ids' : <JSON ID STR>,
'start_time' : <UNIX_TIME>, # 20150319:10:00, here is 1426730400
'end_time' : <UNIX_TIME>, # 20150319:11:00, here is 1426734000
}
adgroup_stats_list = account.get_ad_group_stats(params=params)
for adgroup_stats in adgroup_list:
print adgroup_stats['adgroup_id']
print adgroup_stats['clicks']
print adgroup_stats['impressions']
print adgroup_stats['actions']['mobile_app_install']
it returns stats not in [10:00, 11:00] , but [0:00, current_time], it seems start_time and end_time not useful in hour level, however, when I used the API one month ago, it returns clicks and impressions in [10:00, 11:00], it seems sth changed, and I'm not sure the standard behavior for this API call.
Could anyone answer my question? thanks a lot
Missing video views objective
The objective class is missing the VIDEO_VIEWS property.
How to fetch all fields for an FB Object?
(Sorry if I'm not clear as I can be, I'm recovering from a surgery atm)
If I want to return any fields more than just id
, I have to enter fields
by hand, this is a bit cumbersome:
# note I already have the API session object inside (as in the README.md example)
def fetch_ad_sets(fbid):
# I have :class:`facebookads.objects.AdCampaign` here
campaign = fb_objects.AdCampaign(fbid=fbid)
campaign = campaign.remote_read(
params={"id": fbid},
# Get all the keys inside of a class, useful.
# fields=[attr for attr in dir(fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field) if not callable(getattr(fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field, attr)) and not attr.startswith("__")]
fields=[
fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field.buying_type,
fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field.name,
fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field.objective,
fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field.status,
]
)
ad_sets = campaign.get_ad_sets(
# only returns ID's
# fields=facebookads.objects.AdSet.get_default_read_fields()
# returns everything I specify, but it's manual
fields=[
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.bid_info,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.bid_type,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.budget_remaining,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.campaign_group_id,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.created_time,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.daily_budget,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.end_time,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.lifetime_budget,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.name,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.start_time,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.status,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.targeting,
fb_objects.AdSet.Field.updated_time,
]
)
for ad_set in ad_sets:
print('FbCampaign %s Ad Set: %s' % (campaign, ad_set))
# this would retrieve everything,
# but everything else, including no ``field`` param returns just ``'id'`` for me.
for ad_group in ad_set.get_ad_groups(fields=facebookads.objects.AdGroup.get_default_read_fields()):
print('FbCampaign %s Ad Set %s Ad Group: %s' % (campaign, ad_set, ad_group))
I have tried various things to try to get the fields
param to work when doing remote_read
and padding directly into a object class, however, the only way fields work now is if I do it explicitly.
Here are other things I've tried:
fields=[attr for attr in dir(fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field) if not callable(getattr(fb_objects.AdCampaign.Field, attr)) and not attr.startswith("__")]
fields=facebookads.objects.AdSet.get_default_read_fields()
# not entering fields param at all
All return just the 'id'
.
facebookads 0.2.0 installation fails
When trying to upgrade (or doing a fresh install) of facebookads 0.20 you get this error:
$ pip install --upgrade facebookads==0.2.0
Downloading/unpacking facebookads
Downloading facebookads-0.2.0.tar.gz (377kB): 377kB downloaded
Running setup.py (path:/home/vagrant/env/build/facebookads/setup.py) egg_info for package facebookads
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 17, in <module>
File "/home/vagrant/env/build/facebookads/setup.py", line 46, in <module>
with open(readme_filename) as f:
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/vagrant/env/build/facebookads/README.md'
Complete output from command python setup.py egg_info:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 17, in <module>
File "/home/vagrant/env/build/facebookads/setup.py", line 46, in <module>
with open(readme_filename) as f:
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/vagrant/env/build/facebookads/README.md'
get_reach_estimate
Hello.
I try to get estiamation by this documentation https://www.facebookmarketingdevelopers.com/docs/python but i don't receive cpa_curve_data
field.
What do I wrong?
The new version should be updated to v2.4
I just changed the version in api.py to:
API_VERSION = 'v2.4'
Already accounced V2.4, however, in repo, setup.py, it is still 2.3.3, do we need to change by ourselfes?
according to official announcement.
https://developers.facebook.com/ads/blog/post/2015/07/08/marketing-api-v2_4/
bid_type not available in AdSet object
Hello,
I am currently using version 2.4
I found that I am not able to set bid_type for the ad set that I create. There is no bid_type member available in the AdSet object. I would like to set the bid_type to CPC. The ad set that I create defaults to CPA.
How to work this issue ? Any idea how to set bid_type of the ad set to CPC
Thanks
Sibi
Get account from config file in custom_audience_utils.py is incorrect
Should genereate account like this:
my_account = AdAccount('act_' + config['app_act_id'])
Otherwise, it is not working.
Because, according to the link, https://developers.facebook.com/docs/marketing-api/custom-audience-targeting/v2.3#examples
curl request with parameter: act_<AD_ACCOUNT_ID>
ProductAudienceFields
I got an "Undefined class constant 'RETENTION_SECONDS'" error using the following code:
$audience = new ProductAudience(null, 'act_<ACCOUNT_ID>');
$audience->setData(array(
ProductAudienceFields::NAME => 'Product Audience',
ProductAudienceFields::PRODUCT_SET_ID => '<PRODUCT_SET_ID>',
ProductAudienceFields::PIXEL_ID => '<PIXEL_ID>',
ProductAudienceFields::INCLUSIONS => array(array(
ProductAudienceFields::RETENTION_SECONDS => 1296000,
ProductAudienceFields::RULE => array(
'event'=>array('eq'=>'ViewContent')
)
))
));
$audience->save();
I managed to fix it by adding the following constants to the ProductAudienceFields abstract class of ProductAudienceFields.php file in FacebookAds\Object\Fields :
const RETENTION_SECONDS = 'retention_seconds';
const RULE = 'rule';
Encoding issue when calling API
Hi there,
We encountered encoding issues when trying to send Swedish or French text. We might want to adapt the following code:
if params:
params = _top_level_param_json_encode(params)
keyvals = ['%s=%s' % (key, urllib.parse.quote(value))
for key, value in params.items()]
call['body'] = '&'.join(keyvals)
At first, we thought (as always with encoding) that we should do it ourselves before handing data to the Api, but the issue is that when reading data, the api will return unicode
object instead of basestring
object, hence it makes it difficult to handle every situation. For instance:
data = {...}
data = {key: value.encode("utf-8") for key, value in data.iteritems()}
creative = AdCreative().remote_create(params=data) # this one will work
creative.remote_read(fields=["name", ...]) # let's say the name contains utf-8
adgroup_name = "Adgroup for " + creative["name"] # here we have utf-8
adgroup_data = {"name": "adgroup_name", ...}
adgroup = AdGroup().remote_create(params=adgroup_data) # this call will fail
The exception will be KeyError: u'\xe9'
when calling the urllib.parse.quote
method.
The fix is fairly easy and easily testable, let me know if you're interested in a PR, I can provide it quickly
Batch `Service temporarily unavailable` error for creation of creative with page post inline
I'm trying to create several creatives using [page post inline|]. Here is how I create the creative:
def create_creative(batch, ...):
params[AdCreative.Field.object_story_spec] = {
"page_id": page_id,
"link_data": {
"message": "<name>",
"name": "<name>",
"picture": "<picture-url>",
"description": "<description>",
"link": "<post-link>"
}
}
creative = AdCreative()
creative.remote_create(params=params, batch=batch)
return creative
And then I do the following:
batch = api.new_batch()
creative1 = create_creative(batch, **data)
creative2 = create_creative(batch, **data)
creative3 = create_creative(batch, **data)
creative4 = create_creative(batch, **data)
creative5 = create_creative(batch, **data)
batch.execute()
The result is the following:
- 4 creatives are created properly (1, 2, 3 and 5)
- the 4th one got this error:
facebookads.exceptions.FacebookRequestError(u'Call was not successful \nRequest:\n\t{\'body\': \'<the body>', \'method\': \'POST\', \'relative_url\': \'act_104145169778295/adcreatives\'}\nResponse:\n\tHTTP Status: 500\n\tHeaders:[{u\'name\': u\'Access-Control-Allow-Origin\', u\'value\': u\'*\'}, {u\'name\': u\'Vary\', u\'value\': u\'Accept-Encoding\'}, {u\'name\': u\'Pragma\', u\'value\': u\'no-cache\'}, {u\'name\': u\'Cache-Control\', u\'value\': u\'no-store\'}, {u\'name\': u\'Content-Type\', u\'value\': u\'text/javascript; charset=UTF-8\'}, {u\'name\': u\'Facebook-API-Version\', u\'value\': u\'v2.3\'}, {u\'name\': u\'WWW-Authenticate\', u\'value\': u\'OAuth "Facebook Platform" "invalid_request" "Service temporarily unavailable"\'}, {u\'name\': u\'Expires\', u\'value\': u\'Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 GMT\'}]\n\tBody: {"error":{"message":"Service temporarily unavailable","type":"FacebookApiException","is_transient":false,"code":2,"error_subcode":1487172,"error_user_title":"Could not save creative","error_user_msg":"Could not save creative"}}\n')
It's very strange. I'm sure it's not a pb of the SDK itself, but are you aware of any limitation for creative creation?
Thanks
build_objects_from_response can't parse AdAccount reachestimate
Hi,
when trying to get reachestimate with an AdAccount object, build_objects_from_response can't build the object from the response.
The problem seems to be that the response includes 'data' as a dict, and not as a list. (like in the reachestimate response of AdGroups)
AdAccount response:
{
"users": 3300,
"bid_estimations": [
{
"unsupported": false,
"location": 3,
"cpa_min": 110,
"cpa_median": 202,
"cpa_max": 312,
"cpc_min": 31,
"cpc_median": 57,
"cpc_max": 87,
"cpm_min": 32,
"cpm_median": 92,
"cpm_max": 187
}
],
"estimate_ready": true,
"data": {
"users": 3300,
"bid_estimations": [
{
"unsupported": false,
"location": 3,
"cpa_min": 110,
"cpa_median": 202,
"cpa_max": 312,
"cpc_min": 31,
"cpc_median": 57,
"cpc_max": 87,
"cpm_min": 32,
"cpm_median": 92,
"cpm_max": 187
}
],
"estimate_ready": true
}
}
AdGroup response:
{
"data": [
{
"users": 160000,
"bid_estimations": [
{
"unsupported": false,
"location": 3,
"cpa_min": 114,
"cpa_median": 211,
"cpa_max": 300,
"cpc_min": 23,
"cpc_median": 41,
"cpc_max": 60,
"cpm_min": 221,
"cpm_median": 526,
"cpm_max": 925
}
],
"estimate_ready": true
}
]
}
Impressions returned as unicode string, not int
In the Insights documentation, the stated return type for the Impressions general field is said to be of type Int:
When I am making a get_insight call on an AdAccount object, however, the Impressions field is returned as a unicode string. Here's an example call:
account = AdAccount(account_id)
params = {
'fields': [Insights.Field.impressions,],
'time_range': {
'since': '2015-05-15',
'until': '2015-05-15',
},
}
stats = account.get_insights(params = params)
print stats
What is returned looks like this, and calling type() on the value for "impressions" returns unicode:
[<Insights> {
"date_start": "2015-05-15",
"date_stop": "2015-05-15",
"impressions": "27155"
}]
Am I missing something here, or are impressions just incorrectly being returned as a unicode string?
"how different ad objects are used" link in README is broken.
Question: What is the upgrade plan for the new "Optimization Simplification" in API v2.4?
Detailed here:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/marketing-api/optimization_simplification
My question is, when is thew SDK going to begin supporting the new optimization fields, and is there any plan to support both types of optimization during the transition?
Thanks!
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.