datastrategist / amitfuncs Goto Github PK

check all the inputs and if they are the same input, compare if they have the same definition.

when testing a function, if we take inputs that have options listed, create an output where all of the input combinations are crossed. This will create an output suitable to create unit tests.

Hrm... mess w/ the idea of explicitly stating errors or not?

#' @param boom does x, Default: 'R', Options: c("1","4","6{X}")
#' @param matchingText PARAM_DESCRIPTION, Default: '.', Options: c("a", "bvb", NA{X})
#' @param other does y, Options: c("hello", "bye")

Would produce:

expand_grid(boom  = c("1","4","6{X}"), matchingText  = c("a", "bvb", "NA{X}"), other  = c("hello", "bye"))

and anything that has an X will create an expect_error expectation... else expect class as per output.

This is concise, but it does coerce everything to character. Maybe:

#' @param boom does x, Default: 'R', Options: c(1,4,6), FailureOn: 6

• to be recursive or not, and to exclude certain folders or not

Also... can we make it not visNetwork? igraph might be enough. Or one of the hand-drawn looking ones.