contextmapper / context-mapper-examples Goto Github PK

It would be good to have an example of resource operation delegate to the service operation. I have defined a service and a resource and I am able to inject the service into the resource. I am not able to provide a delegation to the service operation from resource operation. My understanding is following should work but I am getting syntax error.
String createEmployee(@EmployeeDto emp) POST path="/employee" DELEGATE @EmployeeService.addEmployee;
When I use ctrl spacebar I don't get Delegate in the proposal.

I'm just learning about DDD context maps.

Just for learning purposes, I'm trying to model something like this inside a cml document:

This is what I have so far for my cml. I have defined two aggregates. One is frontend and the other Backend Api.

ContextMap CMSRAGService {
	contains SharePointWebPart
	contains BackendApi
	contains AnswerGenerationService
  contains DocumentSummarizationService
	contains AzureOpenAiApi
  contains MSGraphSharePointApi
  contains NaturalLanguageProcessingService

	AzureOpenAiApi [OHS, PL] -> [ACL] AnswerGenerationService
  AnswerGenerationService -> DocumentSummarizationService 
  MSGraphSharePointApi [OHS, PL] -> [ACL] DocumentSummarizationService
  MSGraphSharePointApi ->  NaturalLanguageProcessingService
  NaturalLanguageProcessingService -> DocumentSummarizationService
}

BoundedContext SharePointWebPart{
	Aggregate Frontend {
	}
}

BoundedContext BackendApi
{
	Aggregate BackendApi {
	}
}

BoundedContext AnswerGenerationService

BoundedContext AzureOpenAiApi

BoundedContext NaturalLanguageProcessingService 

BoundedContext MSGraphSharePointApi 

BoundedContext DocumentSummarizationService

The problem is I don't know how to include these other services as a part of the Aggregate.
I saw an example of the keyword "service" and i tried playing around with it, but it doesn't give me what I'm looking for. Just for ha has and giggles, I tried to update the BackendApi context like so:

BoundedContext BackendApi
{
	Aggregate BackendApi {
    knowledgeLevel = CONCRETE
      enum States {
    aggregateLifecycle
    CREATED, POLICY_CREATED, RECALLED
  }
    Service ContractService{
      boolean createPolicy(): write [CREATED -> POLICY_CREATED];
    }
	}
}

It doesn't actually impact the SVG that's rendered.

Does this example:

/context-mapper-examples/blob/master/src/main/cml/architectural-refactorings/AR-02-Split-Bounded-Context-by-Features/example-output.cml

work with the graphical context map generator?

It only shows the PolicyManagementContext and thats it.

Hi! I've been diving into ContextMapper with great interest and enthusiasm, looks like a valuable tool for a system design at hand. However, when playing around with VS Code extension and DDD-Sample, I found out that if I generate PlantUML diagrams, the bounded context diagram is generated only for the first context (in this case Cargo Booking context). How can the UML diagrams be generated for other contexts in the cml file? I did not find documentation about this. I guess I could copy the parts to separate files, but that's not really in the spirit of automatic generation...

The Knowledge Level pattern is not really used in the examples at the moment. Enhance them accordingly.

Hi Stefan et al.,

I've got some issues with the team map example. I copied https://github.com/ContextMapper/context-mapper-examples/blob/master/src/main/cml/insurance-example/Insurance-Example_Team-Map.cml but the result looks like this.

I'm working on Mac OSX with latest VS Code and also tried the Eclipse way, but there I got other issues 😉 .

Responsibility Layers are not really used in the examples at the moment. Enhance them accordingly.

Hi,

In the last months, I was exploring the project and I liked to much because the DSL allow exploring the different scenarios designed by Eric Evans:

• Open Host Service [OHS]
• Published Language [PL]
• Anticorruption Layer [ACL]
• Shared Kernel [SK]
• Conformist [CF]
• Customer / Supplier [C,S]
• Partnership [P]
• Separate ways *
• Big ball of Mud *

but in relation to the technical context map patterns, I didn´t find an asynchronous example for example using a Broker. Maybe at BC level, it is not necesary to represent the physical way to communicate 2 BC but I have the impression that:

• Open Host Service [OHS]
• Published Language [PL]
• Anticorruption Layer [ACL]

Are more oriented to blocking communications. In the other hand, if one BC need to send a Domain Event, maybe every BC send a message based on a contract so it is a kind of PL.

What is your opinion?

Many thanks in advance