Lessons from the workshop about 2019-genesis-workshop

[da-kami]

Fund/Refund/Redeem terms are confusing, proposed terms are Send/Cancel/Receive
People loved hands on format -> Ok refund makes sense. but Lock makes more sense than Fund

my thoughts:

Fund -> Send 😒 - Send is too general and already used to send the swap request
Fund -> Fund 😀 - I like Fund
Fund -> Lock 😐 - I find Fund better, but am OK with Lock
Fund -> Lock Funds 😀
Refund -> Chancel 😒 - too general
Refund -> Revert 😐- would be OK for me
Redeem -> Receive 😀 - I like that, am not exactly happy with Redeem

Note:
in the RFCs that define the implementation (e.g. https://github.com/comit-network/RFCs/blob/master/RFC-005-SWAP-Basic-Bitcoin.md) we actually call the Fund stage Deployment.

[thomaseizinger]

I could live with Lock Funds :)

Suggestions for Redeem (possible concatenated with Funds, same as for Lock Funds):

• Withdraw
• Claim
• Extract
• Unlock
• Take

Since the name of the action is returned by the comit node, we could even make the action name be specific to the asset:

For Alpha:

1. Fund -> Lock Bitcoin
2. Redeem -> Take Ether
3. Refund -> Take Bitcoin back