cfrioux / fluto Goto Github PK

The following case leads to a more permissive scope than expected:

---> S # S is a seed/nutrient
S + I --> I + T

Because of N!=M in the scope rules, a reactant of a reaction does not have to be producible if it is also a product of the (same) reaction. It is more permissive than the strict Ebenhöh-Hendorf scope definition.

In the example above, the recycling of I would be allowed by default and all four compounds would be in the scope of S. The Ebenhöh-Hendorf scope definition expects only Sto be producible.

One mistake (among possibly others) : it says the default formalism is Sagot Acuna.