Extended Relationship Facet about ids

[MatthiasWeise]

New feature for IDS 2.0?
However, I wonder if such kind of checks should be covered by IDS at all. By design IDS wants to hide schema details from the user to be easy to use. Main focus is on availability/correctness of content, but not how it is encoded in IFC (property attached to occurrence or type object does not matter).

[CBenghi]

Indeed,
here we want to make sure that the information is provided.
As long as it's provided according to the IFC best practice, we should be satisfied.
Let IFC deal with file quality, we are all about information!

[pjanck]

I wonder if such kind of checks should be covered by IDS at all

Agreed. This is outside of scope of IDS in my perception as well (even for 2.0).

every significant element should have type

@NickNisbet I propose to use mvdXML to require this.