We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Dead Code
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
Aspect: Header Comments
Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java
lines 114-119
:
/**
* Iteration 1:
* Creates a label with the specified text and adds it to the dialog container.
* @param text String containing text to add
* @return a label with the specified text that has word wrap enabled.
*/
Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java
lines 128-132
:
/**
* Iteration 2:
* Creates two dialog boxes, one echoing user input and the other containing Duke's reply and then appends them to
* the dialog container. Clears the user input after processing.
*/
Example from src/main/java/duke/Duke.java
lines 143-146
:
/**
* You should have your own function to generate a response to user input.
* Replace this stub with your completed method.
*/
Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)
No easy-to-detect issues ๐
โน๏ธ The bot account @cs2103-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected]
if you want to follow up on this post.