Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

bcgov / bc-wallet-mobile Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW
56.0 10.0 44.0 83.82 MB

BC Wallet to hold Verifiable Credentials

License: Apache License 2.0

Shell 0.95% JavaScript 4.40% TypeScript 88.82% Starlark 0.66% Java 1.69% C 0.04% Swift 0.05% Objective-C 1.56% Ruby 1.21% Smarty 0.62%
citz dts

bc-wallet-mobile's Introduction

bc-wallet-mobile's People

Contributors

amanji avatar artemkaaas avatar bryce-mcmath avatar cvarjao avatar dependabot[bot] avatar dinbtechit avatar esune avatar jamshale avatar jleach avatar marcos-carretero avatar nodlesh avatar rajpalc7 avatar wadebarnes avatar wadeking98 avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

bc-wallet-mobile's Issues

Accessibility Features

We are aiming for WCAG 2.1 AA compliance level

  • Voice Control
  • Screen Reader
  • Zoom
  • Color Contrast

Determine the feasibility of compiling Indy SDK for x86

AFJ depends on the Indy SDK to communicate with ledgers. This SDK compiles for Arm architecture but not x86 architecture. It would be good to have it compile for both so that it can run on iOS simulators to speed up development and testing.

Revocation

User Stories

  • As a holder I want to be notified as soon as possible when a credential in my wallet has been revoked, so I understand and feel comfortable with the state of my wallet.
  • As a holder I expect the wallet to use the minimum data and external communications possible to identify revoked credentials, so I feel confident my wallet is working within any data limits my device may have.
  • As a holder I expect it to be clear that a presentation has failed because of a revoked credential, so I can take any desired remedial action.

Background

Credential revocation will be supported in v1.0.

Once an issuer revokes a credential and the ledger is updated, there are three options for the wallet to identify that a credential it holds has been revoked:

  1. Use an existing connection between the holder and the issuer, where the issuer proactively notifies the holder that the credential has been revoked. There is no protocol for this in AIP 1.0 but there is in AIP 2.0, so this is not a workable Wallet v1.0 approach.

  2. Have the wallet poll the ledger at regular intervals, and/or when certain wallet actions are taken. For example, the wallet could poll the ledger once a day, or upon opening / waking.

  3. (Required as part of AIP 1.0 protocols) When a presentation is sent, the verifier agent may inform the wallet that the presentation failed because one or more credentials was identified as revoked. The wallet then updates its registry of credentials to mark the appropriate VCs as revoked, and the user is informed.

(Note: a verifier may still choose to accept a revoked credential as part of a presentation.)

Given the nuances of these three options, Wallet v1.0 will definitely support (3) and likely support (2).

Wireframes:
See Adobe XD file "Collective Digital Wallet UI Design concepts" and go to "credential list" and "credential details" section to see credential UI for revoked credentials.

Summary revocation convo with Ian:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19MxZrZ519Vkrf-bx9oyRegIt2TpSixM8GN_j7Jxkahk/edit?usp=sharing

Out of Scope:

  • Offline

Use Case: Lawyer Access to Court Materials

Issuer: Law Society of BC

  • There can only be 1 active non-revoked credential at the time

Verifier: Court Services

  • Proof Request Predicates
    • Must be Issued by Law Society of BC
    • Must not be revoked
  • Connectionless proof-request

Environments

TEST

  • ledger: sovrin-staging

PROD

  • ledger: sovrin-main-net

Lets use common phrasing

TL;DR ๐ŸŽ๏ธ

Teams are encouraged to favour modern inclusive phrasing both in their communication as well as in any source checked into their repositories. You'll find a table at the end of this text with preferred phrasing to socialize with your team.

Words Matter

We're aligning our development community to favour inclusive phrasing for common technical expressions. There is a table below that outlines the phrases that are being retired along with the preferred alternatives.

During your team scrum, technical meetings, documentation, the code you write, etc. use the inclusive phrasing from the table below. That's it - it really is that easy.

For the curious mind, the Public Service Agency (PSA) has published a guide describing how Words Matter in our daily communication. Its an insightful read and a good reminder to be curious and open minded.

What about the master branch?

The word "master" is not inherently bad or non-inclusive. For example people get a masters degree; become a master of their craft; or master a skill. It's generally when the word "master" is used along side the word "slave" that it becomes non-inclusive.

Some teams choose to use the word main for the default branch of a repo as opposed to the more commonly used master branch. While it's not required or recommended, your team is empowered to do what works for them. If you do rename the master branch consider using main so that we have consistency among the repos within our organization.

Preferred Phrasing

Non-Inclusive Inclusive
Whitelist => Allowlist
Blacklist => Denylist
Master / Slave => Leader / Follower; Primary / Standby; etc
Grandfathered => Legacy status
Sanity check => Quick check; Confidence check; etc
Dummy value => Placeholder value; Sample value; etc

Pro Tip ๐Ÿค“

This list is not comprehensive. If you're aware of other outdated nomenclature please create an issue (PR preferred) with your suggestion.

Automatically open proof request or credential offer when a connection is made

User stories

As a holder I want the proof request or credential offer to be presented automatically right after scanning a QR code from a verifier or issuer so that I don't have to manually open the request or offer myself.

Background
User research has observed moments of confusion in between the process of scanning a QR code and receiving a credential offer or proof request. Many factors play into this confusion:

  • Users see the "success" notification of a connection and assume that the process is done and begin putting the phone away. They expect to have a credential in their wallet or access to the service when a connection was made.
  • Users are taken to the home screen (Trinsic) and nothing happens. They're not sure what to do next.

The purpose of this ticket is to linearize the process in receiving a credential or accepting a proof request. Users are taken to a loading screen. This loading screen is when the wallet and the issuer or verifier is making a connection and then sending them either a credential offer or proof request that opens automatically (no notification is received from the perspective of the user. From their perspective, they automatically are taken to the intended flow). This solution removes the confusion of when a flow is complete with loading screens and eliminates the unnecessary selection of a notification to open up the offer or request.

Acceptance Criteria

Scenario: Presenting a credential

Given Wallet has been setup
When holder scans a QR Code to connect
Then the user is taken to the "Connecting..." screen, AND waits for presentation request
AND then automatically taken to a the "presentation request" screen
AND there is an "Approve" Button
AND there is a "Decline" Button

Scenario: Receiving a credential

Given Wallet has been setup
When holder scans a QR Code to connect
Then the user is taken to the "Connecting..." screen, AND waits for a credential offer
AND the automatically taken to a the "credential offer" screen
AND there is a "Accept" Button
AND there is a "Decline" Button

Note: Is there any hint for the purpose of establishing a connection? For Issuing credential, or for verifying credential?

Reference:
https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-rfcs/blob/main/features/0023-did-exchange/README.md
https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-rfcs/blob/main/concepts/0519-goal-codes/README.md

Testing Service Subscription

Required Testing Features:

  • Camera Injection: Used for injecting QR Codes
  • Device Security / Biometrics Authentication: Used for unlocking the app using device security (e.g.: fingerprint, face, pattern, PIN)

Sauce Labs Subscription:

  • 1 parallel testing in real device
  • 0 parallel testing in virtual device

Estimation:
$249 USD / month (or $ 2988 USD / year)

Activity History

User stories

  • As a holder I want to be able to see my activity history, so that I can have peace of mind that I am fully aware of all the transactions that have taken place.
  • As a holder I expect to be able to review my activity history in reverse chronological order, so the most recent activities are the first ones I review.
  • As a holder I want to be able to delete my activity history so I feel in control of my data usage and privacy.

Background

Activity History is a historical log of all the actions/transactions that took place. These may include:

  • Issued/received credentials and by who

  • Shared/providing credentials with who

  • Declined credential offer and by who

  • Declined proof request and by who

  • Remove credential

  • Revoked credential

  • Added connection

  • Forget connection

  • Proof request failed

  • Issued credential failed

  • Added connection failed

  • Deferred ID verification sent(?) - QC*

  • Deferred ID verification accepted - QC*

  • Deferred ID verification refused - QC*

  • QC specific as they also plan to have an in-app ID credential

Questions:

  • The activity log is stored local. What happens when I get a new phone? Re-install the app?
  • What length of time is the activity log stored? - Policy question?

Out of Scope:

  • Connection History
  • Basic Message / Chat history?

SCRUM Process

  • Ceremonies

    • Daily standup @ 9:00AM PST
    • Backlog Refinement: Every Tuesday 11AM - 12PM
    • Sprint Planning: Every other Thursday 9AM - 10AM
    • Sprint Review: Every other Wednesday 11AM - 11:30AM
    • Sprint Retrospective: Every other Wednesday 11:30AM - 12PM
  • Definition of Ready

    • User Story Format and description
    • Acceptance Criteria
    • Estimated ( Story Points)
  • Definition of Done (Dev team)

    • It Works
    • Merged to the main branch
    • Unit Testing
  • Definition of Review/QA

    • Should we consider this to mean this is where the testing team, dev, or UX reviews issues, conducts testing, etc.?
  • Definition of Closed (Product Owner)

    • Acceptance criteria is met
  • Team Agreements

  • Definition on what is a "bug"

  • Tools

    • GitHub Issues + ZenHub
    • Mural Boards
  • Guiding Principles

  • Estimation (Story Points)

  • Epics (do they go to print backlog) vs Tasks vs Stories vs Spike

    • Format (As a ... I want ... So That ...)
    • Acceptance Criteria (Given .. When ... Then)
    • We should be aiming to work with Stories (testable)
    • How do we represent and split UX and Coding work? Decision: UX Work get their own tickets and use the "UX Work" Label
    • Epics MUST have User Story
    • User Story MAY have an epic
    • User Story MUST have one or more tasks
    • We may have reporting purposes epics to support high level grouping (with a a specific label)
  • Labels:

    • Epic
    • User Story
    • Task
    • Spike
  • Backlog Management

    • INVEST
    • 3 Cs
    • Columns / States
    • Who moves to what column

Glossary:

Messaging

Use the connection to exchange generic messages (e.g.: text, picture,...)

Presenting a LSBC Credential to BCCS

User Stories

  • As a holder I need to use my device's camera to scan a QR code so I can start presenting things from my wallet.
  • As a holder I need to be told if a QR code is not for VCs so I can take appropriate action to get the right QR code.
  • As a holder I need to approve any presentation request so I feel in control of how my wallet's contents are used.
  • As a holder I want, as part of the presentation request, to see the name and branding of the verifier so I feel more confident in who I'm presenting my wallet's contents to.
  • As a holder I need to know which VCs and fields are being used for a presentation so I understand how my wallet's contents are being used and where information is coming from.
  • As a holder I need to be able to choose, where applicable, which VC fields are used for a presentation so I can choose the most appropriate information to present.
  • As a holder I need to know if my presentation was accepted by a verifier so I know how to proceed with the situation.
  • As a holder I need the ability to take action if any part of the presentation process is taking too long so I can retry or abandon as I choose.
  • As a holder I need to be notified if any part of the presentation process occurs when I'm elsewhere in the app, or outside the app, so I am always aware of what's taking place and what actions I should take.
  • As a holder I need the activity history to be updated with the results of a presentation request so I can feel confident I know what's taken place in my wallet and can refer back to it later if required.
  • As a holder I want to see information about the verifier such as their logo, official name, and appropriate colours, so I feel more confident that I am presenting my wallet's contents to the right verifier.

Wiredframes/mockup: https://xd.adobe.com/view/74b73461-45e5-4f2b-b219-79ffe9c852a7-21e4/

Acceptance Criteria

Scenario: No Matching Credential Exists in Wallet

Given the Holder does not have any existing Member Certificate from LSBC in their wallet
When the Holder receives a proof request from a verifier
Then the Holder is presented with a proof request stating that that the credential is "Not available in your wallet"
And a message that states "[verifier name] requested something you don't have available"
And is presented with the "Decline" button
Wireframes: https://xd.adobe.com/view/51cab5b3-ada1-4393-9b8f-1b6820164ccd-0499/

Given the Holder does have an existing Member Certificate from LSBC in their wallet
And it is revoked
When the Holder receives a proof request from a verifier
Then the Holder is presented with a proof request stating that that the credential is "Revoked"
And is presented with the "Decline" button
Wireframes: https://xd.adobe.com/view/51cab5b3-ada1-4393-9b8f-1b6820164ccd-0499/screen/95ca2a5a-1601-4240-8aae-f61eca4cb156

Scenario: At least 1 Credential matches the proof request

Given the Holder does have an existing Member Certificate from LSBC in their wallet
When the Holder receives a proof request from BCCS
Then the Holder is presented with a proof request with a list of requested proofs
And is presented with the "Approve" and "Decline" buttons
Wireframes: https://xd.adobe.com/view/51cab5b3-ada1-4393-9b8f-1b6820164ccd-0499/screen/a40439e0-2156-4a5e-8375-509ff2447971

Scenario: More than 1 Credential matches the proof request, uses the most recently issued one

Given the Holder has multiple existing Member Certificates from LSBC in their wallet
When the Holder receives a proof request from BCCS
Then the Holder is presented with a proof request with a list of requested proofs
And the most recent Member Certificate is used
And is presented with the "Approve" and "Decline" buttons

  • Is this scenario even valid for Lawyer use case
  • It might be an edge case when the wallet revocation list is out of date

Not In Scope

Scenario: More than 1 Credential matches the proof request, suggests the most recently issued one, and let user change

Scenario: At least 1 Revoked Credential matching proof request

Scenario: At least 1 Non-Revoked and 1 Revoked Credential matching proof request

Notes:

  • Does Court Services accepts revoked credential?

Credential branding v1

  • During transactions with the wallet (proof request, credential offer) the organization's branding (logo) is displayed in the ID Holder's wallet
  • Credential theming - Organization branding (logo, colour) is displayed in the connections list of the ID holder's wallet
  • Field Labeling:
    • Crawl: Lookup Table based on credential definition ID and/or schema id, fallback to best effort transforming
    • Walk: OCA/Registry discovery
    • Support for the OCA label overlay
      Schemas:
  • LSBC Membership Card
  • Pilot Invitation Credential
  • Verified Person Credential

Verify Device Ownership: when opening the app

  • no app PIN required
  • use device unlocking mechanisms, which might be one of the following depending of OS
    • nothing
    • PIN
    • pattern
    • face recognition
    • fingerprint

Whether biometrics is required (i.e. no app/device PIN fallback)
How we handle a biometrics failure: are they locked out forever? For a time?
If holder verification is needed before presenting or receiving VC

Questions:

  • What is the fallback when the device security changes? fallback to an application PIN?
  • Does it auto lock after some idling period?

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Verify ownership ship when launching the app
  • Verify ownership when the app is activated (if it was sleeping and running on the background)

References:

Finalize sys-architecture with Pan-Can

The work involved to align Ontario and Quebec in their concepts and design to ensure a consistent user experience and to maximize reusable components.

Add missing topics

TL;DR

Topics greatly improve the discoverability of repos; please add the short code from the table below to the topics of your repo so that ministries can use GitHub's search to find out what repos belong to them and other visitors can find useful content (and reuse it!).

Why Topic

In short order we'll add our 800th repo. This large number clearly demonstrates the success of using GitHub and our Open Source initiative. This huge success means it's critical that we work to make our content as discoverable as possible. Through discoverability, we promote code reuse across a large decentralized organization like the Government of British Columbia as well as allow ministries to find the repos they own.

What to do

Below is a table of abbreviation a.k.a short codes for each ministry; they're the ones used in all @gov.bc.ca email addresses. Please add the short codes of the ministry or organization that "owns" this repo as a topic.

add a topic

That's it, you're done!!!

How to use

Once topics are added, you can use them in GitHub's search. For example, enter something like org:bcgov topic:citz to find all the repos that belong to Citizens' Services. You can refine this search by adding key words specific to a subject you're interested in. To learn more about searching through repos check out GitHub's doc on searching.

Pro Tip ๐Ÿค“

  • If your org is not in the list below, or the table contains errors, please create an issue here.

  • While you're doing this, add additional topics that would help someone searching for "something". These can be the language used javascript or R; something like opendata or data for data only repos; or any other key words that are useful.

  • Add a meaningful description to your repo. This is hugely valuable to people looking through our repositories.

  • If your application is live, add the production URL.

Ministry Short Codes

Short Code Organization Name
AEST Advanced Education, Skills & Training
AGRI Agriculture
ALC Agriculture Land Commission
AG Attorney General
MCF Children & Family Development
CITZ Citizens' Services
DBC Destination BC
EMBC Emergency Management BC
EAO Environmental Assessment Office
EDUC Education
EMPR Energy, Mines & Petroleum Resources
ENV Environment & Climate Change Strategy
FIN Finance
FLNR Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations & Rural Development
HLTH Health
IRR Indigenous Relations & Reconciliation
JEDC Jobs, Economic Development & Competitiveness
LBR Labour Policy & Legislation
LDB BC Liquor Distribution Branch
MMHA Mental Health & Addictions
MAH Municipal Affairs & Housing
BCPC Pension Corporation
PSA Public Service Agency
PSSG Public Safety and Solicitor General
SDPR Social Development & Poverty Reduction
TCA Tourism, Arts & Culture
TRAN Transportation & Infrastructure

NOTE See an error or omission? Please create an issue here to get it remedied.

Obtaining a Credential from LSBC

User Stories

  • As a holder I need to use my device's camera to scan a QR code so I can start receiving VCs to my wallet.
  • As a holder I need to be told if a QR code is not for VCs so I can take appropriate action to get the right QR code.
  • As a holder I need to approve any offered credential so I feel in control of my wallet.
  • As a holder I need to know where a VC is coming from, including the appropriate name and branding of the issuer, so I feel confident in the source of what I'm receiving.
  • As a holder I need to see the contents of the offered VC so I understand what I'm accepting and feel confident in its validity.
  • As a holder I need to know if the credential successfully arrived so I am kept informed about the contents of my wallet.
  • As a holder I need the ability to take action if any part of the receiving process is taking too long so I can retry or abandon as I choose.
  • As a holder I need to be notified if any part of the receiving process occurs when I'm elsewhere in the app, or outside the app, so I am always aware of what's taking place and what actions I should take.
  • As a holder I need the activity history to be updated with the results of a receiving process so I can feel confident I know what's taken place in my wallet and can refer back to it later if required.

Wireframe/Mockup: https://xd.adobe.com/view/3db881d4-e963-42ec-a2c4-6b5ca23862a3-68eb/

Update Credential

How do we group credentials and present them to users that they now have versions of the same credential?

Receiving an updated credential of an existing one

Release: 1.0.0

Focuses on application stability and functionality with very small UX improvements (in comparison to other wallets)

In Scope:

  • BC Themed look and feel
  • Increased build reliability and stability
  • Automated build pipeline
  • Automated deployment pipeline
  • Support for Online presentation

Out of Scope:

  • Major UX rework
    • Inversion of flow (Verifier scans Holder QR Code)
  • In person credential verification
  • Offline

Acceptance Criteria:

  • App published in the Apple and Google App Store and available only to a few selected people
  • Supports the BCLS use case
  • Can lawyers successfully store and and use their VC as defined in Use Case #30

BC Wallet Variation Build

TL;DR

Our goal is to develeope a wallet app capable of holding verifiable credentials that is based on Aries Bifold.

We will base our work of Aries Bifold so that we may leverage the collective comunity development effort to reduce the work of any single team.

We will default to the most simple solution that allows us to acomplish our goals with no imediat long term issues. When the solution no longer works, we will make small iterative changes to overcome said issue as they arise.

Intial Solution

Our initial requirements include a release of Aries Bifold, AS-IS, to the Google Play and Apple iTunes store with the following customizations:

  • BC Gov colour palette in place; and
  • BCSans Font; and
  • Bundle / Package IDs set to ca.bc.gov.BCWalelt; and
  • Applicaiton icons.

To meet our initial requriements we will:

  1. Repository Management

We're not sure if we shoulf fork or just push existing bifold code to our BC Wallet repository. Forking would require us to re-create all our issues and cannot be broken easily in the future.

For the time being we'll continue with our seporate repo with matching history.

  1. Implement

We will implement the 4 requirements above and have apply them as a patch during the build process. They will not be a permanent change commited to the up-stream (Hyperledger) repo.

When this strategy is no longer viable we will iterate to the next least complicated and sustanable strategy to solve our issue.

  1. Upstream

We will continiously pull up-stream changes into our "fork" so that we are in sync.

  1. The Build

There is quite a bit of work to solve "the last mile" distribution of the BC Wallet.

  • We need solve application signing in a secure and reliable way so that the build process can produce an artifact accepted by Apple and Google.

  • We need to solve automated upload to both iTunes and Google Play so the signed artifact can be distrubted to testers or released for public consumtpion.

Give we're doing infrequent builds and its not overly complicated to do we'll adopt the same process we used for the BC Smart Health Card Wallet PoC: Manual builds on developer laptops. This will let us solve our imediate problem now, while working on the fully automated sultion as needed.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • There is a build and deployment pipeline in place
  • A few selected people may download the app from the Apple App Store
  • A few selected people may download the app from the Google App Store

In App Notifications

User Stories

  • As a holder I need to be temporarily notified within the app, in an unobtrusive way, when certain processes are successfully completed.

  • As a holder I need temporary notifications to be easily dismissed at a time of my choosing, so I can ensure I've read the notification before it is removed.

  • As a holder I need to be notified within the app when there are things that require my attention and action, such as approving a presentation request or receiving an offered credential.

  • As a holder I need to be notified by my device's OS when there are in-app notifications that require my attention and action but I'm not currently using the wallet app.

  • As a holder I want notifications outside of the app to take me directly to the in-app notification that needs my attention, so I minimize the number of steps required to take action.

  • As a holder I need to be able to easily review all the notifications that need my attention and attend to them in an order of my choice, so I can prioritize actions as I see fit.

  • As a holder I need to browse my notifications in reverse chronological order, so I can make better assessments of what notifications to address first.

  • As a holder I expect quick access to the most recent notification so I can take quick action on what is likely to be at the forefront of my mind.

  • As a holder I need to see an informative summary of a notification before I go into its detail and get asked to take action on it.

  • As a holder I want to be notified when the state of my wallet is notably changed, or changed or used in a way I might not reasonably expect as part of my current actions, so I always feel secure and in control of my wallet.

Background

The user needs to be notified of various wallet activities and requests.

Notifications will take three forms:

Temporary notifications. These are about events that have just occurred, and are for events small enough to not warrant a formal step in a process. For example: "Changes to settings saved โˆš". They may also be used to signpost the user to a permanent notification, for example: "New credential offer". These notification types are likely not reflected in the wallet's history and do not have a home anywhere in the app. They may be implicitly dismissed by a user action that moves away from the current screen.
Appearance: some form of overlay to the screen the user is currently on.
Action type: Dismiss informally (e.g. swipe away or tap 'X'), or single action (e.g. go to screen about a new credential offer).

Queued notifications. These notifications live in a permanent home in the app, and stay there until actively dismissed or interacted with. They may be used to handle VC actions (e.g. agree to receive an issued VC), or to be notified of bigger wallet changes (e.g. VC has been revoked). These are likely to be reflected in the wallet's history.
Appearance: (a) badge indicator in tab bar (number in red circle), (b) summary on app Home Screen, and (c) notification details on app's Notifications screen. Note: (a) and (b) stay visible until the notification is interacted with and completed.
Action type: Dismiss formally (e.g. 'Dismiss' or 'OK') or take action (e.g. 'Review credential').

Push notifications. These notifications are OS-level only, i.e. either iOS or Android. They show up using the OS notification systems, such as an app icon badge and/or on the Lock Screen. They have a direct correlation to the queued notifications: each push notification corresponds to a queued notification.
Appearance: dictated by OS.
Action type: links directly to notifications screen inside app.

Improvements to Multi-ledger Support

Support for credentials and connections from multiple ledgers.
Maybe a developer switch for enabling dev networks

Multi-ledger support has been added to AFJ. AFJ strategy currently checks on all ledgers

Scenarios

  • Issuer, Verifier, and Holder are on the same network
  • Issuer, Verifier, and Holder are each on a different network

Presenting a proof with credentials from multiple networks

When issuer and verifiers are in different ledgers
E.g.: Issuer, Schema, and Credential Definition is on CANDY, but verifier is from SOVRIN

Can we we have Schema in one ledger and Credential Definition on another ledger pointing to the same schema?

Determine the feasibility of OCA for AnonCreds

We recognize that AnonCreds are lacking some capabilities that would make them more human and machine consumable. We will be looking into Overlay Capture Architecture as a suitable overlay to augment said credentials.

In the spirit of community well worth through this issue with Ontario & Quebec.

Filtering/Sorting Credential List

As a holder, I would like my old/revoked credentials to be organized so that I can focus on my current credentials and manage old credentials.

Auto-present

Ability to edit existing auto-presentations
Ability to create new auto-presentations
Whether auto-present is a combo of cred/issuer/verifier, or some subset
Whether an auto-present is auto-deleted if issuer/verifier was connected, and now they're not
Whether an auto-present is auto-deleted if cred is deleted / reissued

Questions:

  • There may be a security issue

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.