Does `correct!()` support `missing` samples as explained in docs? about lowlevelparticlefilters.jl

[baggepinnen]

We do not support missing values for all filters at this point. The docs do not intend to claim that we support missing values, if that's your interpretation of the "Dropped samples" section it needs some clarification :) The docs are simply trying to say that supporting missing values in your own filter loop is trivial.

[justidy1]

Thank you! That make sense, I was just a bit confused.

Just one more quick question for clarification. How do you interpret the short circuit evaluation mentioned above?

[baggepinnen]

How do you interpret the short circuit evaluation mentioned above?

As you say, it's there to handle missing measurements. The problem is that not all filters have this mechanism implemented yet. The method used there is also not always the optimal way to handle missing measurements. In cases when you have more than one sensor, you can still perform the measurement update with a subset of the measurements if some but not all are missing.

[justidy1]

Okay, thank you for the clarification!