arkeas / chummer Goto Github PK

The remaining content from the Shadowrun 2050 sourcebook needs to be added. 
Done up to the start of Electronics on 177.

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a New Character, select any Shapeshifter metatype, and hit OK.
2. Select from the Special Menu, any other Shapeshifter metatype, hit OK.
3. There is no Critter tab shown with Critter Powers.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
There should be a Critter tab visible with the Critter powers appropriate for 
the new Shapeshifter Metatype.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Observed with Build 445, on both Windows 7 & Windows 8.

Please provide any additional information below.
This persists in saved characters, I've attached a sample file that was 
generated with this procedure that demonstrates the problem.

Requsted by KnightAries on Dumpshock.

Optional Rule: Break up skill groups during character creation.

SR20A Pg 68

Requested by almost normal on Dumpshock.

A request, if possible. I'm not allowed to change the percentage cost of 
animals. I'd like to be able to, to represent trained or fertile animals.

Requested by KnightAries on Dumpshock.

Feature request:

I'm asking for commlinks to be it's own section like weapons, gear, armor, and 
life style.

With basically all the matrix gear there.

headware commlinks can fall under it with the ability to show or be modified 
kinda like grenades are.

Agents/IC/Pilot programs can be handled like spirits/sprites

Comments from Nebular

There should be a dedicated tab for Commlinks that lets a player manage all of 
the Commlinks from one tab, enabling and disabling them as needed. Only one 
Commlink would be allowed as "Active" at a time to contribute towards Matrix 
Initiative.

Requested by valavaern on Dumpshock.

Also, I'd like to re-itterate my request to be able to adjust the skill/skill 
group caps (for making more advanced characters) without having to use the 
'ignore character creation rules' option.

As of 2012-01-20 Chummer Build 441 does not run on MacOS or Linux/BSD operating 
systems.

Still the latest stable version of Mono (2.10.8) has not implemented the 
SplitContainer class for the System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize interface 
as defined by .Net 4.0 and consequently required for Chummer.

In the current beta release of Mono (3.0.3) this issue is fixed, but this 
version also fails due to many other issues concerning the incomplete .NET 4.0 
implementation.

Latest stable (1.4.1) and development (1.5.22) releases of WINE only work 
partially, because WINE still is not fully compatible with .Net 4.0. 
Unfortunatly some unhandled exceptions in calculations for cyber-/bioware e.g. 
prevent you from creating a new character.

This is a generic bug report. Chummer is a great piece of software and the most 
feature-rich and complete character generator for a pen and paper roleplaying 
game I ever came across. Please consider the use of cross-platform libraries 
for future development (for a new version for SR5 e.g.).

Thank you for making Chummer available as free and open source software.

Reported by valavaern on Dumpshock.

Error found: Program Suites (such the FTL Matrix Wizard) cannot be gotten in 
hacked form, like the normal matrix programs (and program bundles listed in 
that category) can.

Requested by Hellfire on Dumpshock.

it would be great if you could add the possibility to create a free sprite, in 
the same way that you added the free spirit.
Currently you can only select specific sprites which have limited options of 
possible complex forms (for example you cannot create a machine sprite with a 
spoof complex form, a free sprite could however have such a combination).

Information on these can be found on Unwired 157.

Requested by McDougle on Dumpshock.

Just noticed something that bugs me every time I open a Char in Chummer(or took 
the time to mention it ^^ ):

When you open up a tab(like Gear) the Locations are always expanded... It would 
be grand if they would be collapsed(or if we could choose our favorite option 
in the options wink.gif ).

Further comments from SpellBinder.

Just thought of another functionality bit, something that can help for those 
characters that have tons of gear with sub-menus (like a rigger with a dozen 
different vehicles/drones). Would it be possible to have Chummer remember if a 
parent item has an expanded or compressed list when a file is saved and/or 
loaded? Would it also be possible to have vehicles/drones put into categories, 
like the gear & weapons & armor & such can be?

Comments from Nebular

This should be added as an option if possible.

repro steps
1. Create new character
2. Give the character SINner (Standard)

Trust Fund does not appear in the list of positive qualities

Version 0.0.0.439

Requested by Hellfire on Dumpshock.

could you add the option to delete custom PACKS kits in the program?, because 
once they are in there you are stuck with them, even if you made some errors or 
the gear does not work as intended (see above). Of course you can delete the 
whole custom file, however that means you have to start from scratch with 
everything custom.

Requested by Makki on Dumpshock.

are you planning on adding training cost for animals? It's Running Wild p.35
Maybe as "plugin" for animals in the gear section?

Comments from Nebular

For now this can at least be handled in Career Mode by creating a manual 
Expense Entry.

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create new Character, ignore building rules for convenience
2. Set AGI = 5, REA = 5, Nuyen 50 points
3. Add Synaptic Booster 1
4. Add Heavy Military Armor
5. Check Common TAB, no penalty for REA but not for AGI

6. Remove Synaptic Booster
7. Check Common TAB, penalty for REA and AGI

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The REA attribute should receive the same penalty as AGI

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Version 0.0.0.458

Please provide any additional information below.

Checking the corresponding Code in the frmCareer.cs I find that Values SHOULD 
be applied correctly:

                // Remove any Improvements from Armor Encumbrance.
                _objImprovementManager.RemoveImprovements(Improvement.ImprovementSource.ArmorEncumbrance, "Ballistic Encumbrance");
                _objImprovementManager.RemoveImprovements(Improvement.ImprovementSource.ArmorEncumbrance, "Impact Encumbrance");
                // Create the Armor Encumbrance Improvements.
                if (_objCharacter.BallisticArmorEncumbrance < 0)
                {
                    _objImprovementManager.CreateImprovement("AGI", Improvement.ImprovementSource.ArmorEncumbrance, "Ballistic Encumbrance", Improvement.ImprovementType.Attribute, "", 0, 1, 0, 0, _objCharacter.BallisticArmorEncumbrance);
                    _objImprovementManager.CreateImprovement("REA", Improvement.ImprovementSource.ArmorEncumbrance, "Ballistic Encumbrance", Improvement.ImprovementType.Attribute, "", 0, 1, 0, 0, _objCharacter.BallisticArmorEncumbrance);

                }
                if (_objCharacter.ImpactArmorEncumbrance < 0)
                {
                    _objImprovementManager.CreateImprovement("AGI", Improvement.ImprovementSource.ArmorEncumbrance, "Impact Encumbrance", Improvement.ImprovementType.Attribute, "", 0, 1, 0, 0, _objCharacter.ImpactArmorEncumbrance);
                    _objImprovementManager.CreateImprovement("REA", Improvement.ImprovementSource.ArmorEncumbrance, "Impact Encumbrance", Improvement.ImprovementType.Attribute, "", 0, 1, 0, 0, _objCharacter.ImpactArmorEncumbrance);
                }

Giving AGI and REA the same penalty!

Having a look at the definition of Synaptic Booster and for example Reaction 
Impovement (which doesn't result in this "bug" as I know so far) they have the 
same definition:

        <bioware>
            <name>Synaptic Booster</name>
            <category>Cultured</category>
            <rating>3</rating>
            <ess>Rating * 0.5</ess>
            <capacity>0</capacity>
            <avail>(Rating * 6)R</avail>
            <cost>Rating * 80000</cost>
            <bonus>
                <initiativepass>Rating</initiativepass>
                <specificattribute>
                    <name precedence="1">REA</name>
                    <val>Rating</val>
                </specificattribute>
            </bonus>
            <source>SR4</source>
            <page>347</page>
        </bioware>



                <cyberware>
            <name>Reaction Enhancers</name>
            <category>Bodyware</category>
            <rating>3</rating>
            <ess>Rating * 0.3</ess>
            <capacity>0</capacity>
            <avail>(Rating * 5)R</avail>
            <cost>Rating * 10000</cost>
            <bonus>
                <specificattribute>
                    <name precedence="1">REA</name>
                    <val>Rating</val>
                </specificattribute>
            </bonus>
            <source>SR4</source>
            <page>342</page>
        </cyberware>

So I can find nothing wrong in the sourcecode and definition of the items.