Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

2-link-manipulator's Introduction

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Controller for 2-Link Robotic Manipulator

Abstract

This paper proposes and analyzes a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller for a classic 2-link robotic manipulator. Initially, we present the equations of motion for the two-link robotic manipulator. The primary focus is on controlling the robot manipulator to achieve the desired position using the computed torque control method. Control simulations are conducted using MATLAB, and various computer simulations are employed to evaluate the controller's performance. Specifically, simulations are performed under Proportional-Derivative (PD), Proportional-Integral (PI), and PID control with different sets of control gains (kp, ki, kd). The findings and analysis are verified through simulations using MATLAB's SIMULINK. Additionally, the pros and cons of different control models are discussed.

Contents

  • Equations of Motion: Mathematical equations describing the dynamics of the 2-link robotic manipulator.
  • PID Controller Design: Implementation of the PID controller for controlling the manipulator's position.
  • Simulation Setup: Detailed instructions on how to conduct simulations using MATLAB and SIMULINK.
  • Results and Analysis: Discussion of simulation results and analysis of controller performance under different control models.
  • Extensive Use of SIMULINK: Explanation of the significant role SIMULINK plays in visualizing and analyzing the simulated system.
  • Conclusion: Summary of findings and insights gained from the study.

Instructions for Simulations

  1. Run the provided MATLAB scripts for PID controller design and simulation setup.
  2. Adjust control gains (kp, ki, kd) as necessary to observe the effects on controller performance.
  3. Utilize SIMULINK to visualize the simulated system and observe real-time responses.
  4. Analyze the results and compare the performance of PD, PI, and PID control strategies.

Pros and Cons of Different Control Models

  • PID Controller:

    • Pros: Offers precise control over position, velocity, and acceleration. Relatively simple to implement.
    • Cons: Susceptible to oscillations and overshooting, requires tuning of multiple parameters.
  • PD Controller:

    • Pros: Provides faster response than PID due to derivative action, reduces overshoot.
    • Cons: Unable to eliminate steady-state error, sensitive to noise and disturbances.
  • PI Controller:

    • Pros: Eliminates steady-state error, suitable for systems with unknown disturbances.
    • Cons: Slower response compared to PD, may lead to oscillations in certain scenarios.

2-link-manipulator's People

Contributors

aniruthsuresh avatar aniruth1102 avatar

Watchers

 avatar

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.