Especially on Mac, but also on Windows. It's just plain awful. I'm trying to explore the documentation but it's just a bad experience.

Hopefully someone will take notice.

akkadotnet.com / org is available? I'm happy to stump up the $10 for it

header

not a header

public void apa{
     public void foo() 
    {
    }
}

header

Thought it might be helpful for some if, on the What is Akka page, we added links to the Apache License and an explainer instead of just the text.

On the Deployment Scenarios page, I noticed there is an empty section for Windows Service.

Adding it here in case someone wants to take it on (may do so myself).

I'm new to Akka.Net so please forgive any inaccuracies here.

The docs at http://getakka.net/docs/Serilog have the following HOCON string

var system = ActorSystem.Create("my-test-system", "akka { logLevel=INFO,  loggers=['Akka.Logger.Serilog.SerilogLogger, Akka.Logger.Serilog']}");

The single quotes seem to cause the parse to fail. Changing them to escaped double quotes fixed my logging.

Pages where the headers contain characters such as . ? will generate an invalid href link.

On the Deployment Scenarios page, I noticed there is an empty section for ASP.NET.

Adding it here in case someone wants to take it on (may do so myself).

I noticed that several links on the wiki (which is nice, by the way) have ^ in their names.

Is this intentional? If not, I could jump in to help clean it up.

Screenshot

An image appears to be missing from the Actor System page.
Minor; just noting for future reference.

Screenshot

The CircuitBreaker docs page has a section for examples but they do not display. Instead it has ".. includecode::" statements, all of which look like they are trying to include files that are wrong and apparently there is no directories on your website github repo matching those listed in the includecode statement.

The F# and C# Initialization sections are trying to include the wrong file, so if they did exist they would show incorrect examples for the section they are attempted to be included in.

The F# call protection is referencing a scala file instead of an fs file. So if it existed they would still be incorrect.

The C# call protection is referencing a java file instead of a cs. file. So if it existed they would still be incorrect.