Comments (8)
There is a small section about running the RUnit tests inside the README file (See "Tests" chapter).
You have to run the script runit/batchcorrection_runtests.R
. So the command is:
Rscript runit/batchcorrection_runtests.R
Give it a try and see if it prints you warning and/or errors.
from batch_correction.
Hi @pkrog
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that in the dev branch, you made some changes to the runitfolder (now called "test") but no update of the batchcorrection_runtests.R
. It seems there are quiet a few changes to be done but I am not familiar with this. The files in the res
folder (that seems to correspond to the old output
one) are quite different from the previous ones. I imagine that the test scripts would need quite a few changes? But again, I am not familiar with this testing process so even if I tryed investigating the question looking at the old and new versions of this testing suit, I am a little confused here...
Any suggestion?
from batch_correction.
I've looked at your branch Dusting_and_update
, but I don't see the test
folder, or the runit
folder.
from batch_correction.
Yes, in fact I have just removed it a few minutes ago in 1944b07 : I was about to make a comment about it when someone grabbed me for an unplanned meeting.
Truth is I have a training next week, so I was going to suggest to remove the tests for now to be able to validate a version I hope to get on prod instance quickly, and then to create a dedicated Runit branch based on first a reverse commit of 1944b07
This way I can make people use the latest fonctionalities next week and have a dedicated branch for the RUnit question.
Is this ok for you?
from batch_correction.
It's better to let the folder inside the project, and comment out the code that runs it.
Inside the file .travis.yml
, just comment out the following line:
- PLANEMO=
but left unchanged the line with PLANEMO=yes
,
and those tests won't be run on Travis.
from batch_correction.
Are you sure? Wouldn't it be a problem since it is going to be merged then in the master branch and then put in the main Galaxy toolshed? I have no doubt it will be no problem to pass Travis tests and no impact on the tool run is expected. However I am not too sure whether a public deposit with not-functionnal RUnit tests is a good idea.
Or maybe there are common ways to tag part of the content to be an "in progress" stuff that should not be taken into consideration by people that would get the latest prod version deposit? I am not very familiar to common practices regarding this kind of things.
from batch_correction.
The galaxy toolshed is another thing, when you publish your tool into it, you must not put this test
folder since it will not be used by Galaxy. Only the tests inside the XML and the test-data
folder go into the Galaxy toolshed.
You won't put the Travis files (.travis.yml
and travis-tests
) either inside the Galaxy toolshed by the way, nor the Makefile
file.
So, yes, it's OK if you let the folder test
as is, and comment out the line inside .travis.yml
.
from batch_correction.
Okay, thank you! I will make the modifications accordingly.
from batch_correction.
Related Issues (4)
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from batch_correction.