Change pwnedPasswordRange to resolve with array of objects about hibp

[danieladams456]

Race condition #24 :D

[wKovacs64]

The one thing you lose (I think) is the ability to do a result.includes(searchString). You instead have to do an array.filter(anonymousFunction) like this. I would argue it follows principle of least surprise as you have to declare which field you want to search. Are there any other concerns I'm not thinking of?

I think filter makes more sense than includes. It's also more accurate as includes would pick up substrings, perhaps unintentionally. It does come at a performance cost, though.

[danieladams456]

Even with filter(), latency is still mainly spent on the http call. To be at the level where filter would matter CPU instructions wise, you'd be at pretty much at abuse level of the API.

[wKovacs64]

Agreed, should be negligible.