Possible Change about gockle

[willfaught]

Hi, @clawconduce. That would be really useful! Currently, you can do stuff like "for any set of arguments, do X". How could you do that with this kind of change? It seems like with the way go-mock works at the moment, you can either use mock.Any only for individual arguments — as you've shown above — or only for all of them as a whole — as it works now — but not both. Perhaps this is better addressed in go-mock itself by adding that capability for interface{} vararg functions? I'm interested in your thoughts.

Have you tried using mock.AnyIf? For example:

m.When("F", mock.AnyIf(func(v interface{}) bool { return v.([]interface{})[2].(string) == "test" }))

[willfaught]

(Incidentally, your idea spurred me to move all the Session arguments parameters to the end of the parameter lists for consistency and for simplicity where there are no arguments. I just pushed those changes.)

[clawconduce]

Good point. I can see how both cases are useful, and it's either or. I like the idea of putting something in go-mock that would cover both cases. As a bonus, it looks like it would just be adding something that would break out of this loop: https://github.com/maraino/go-mock/blob/master/mock.go#L286

[willfaught]

OK, I'm going to close this issue. I see you opened a go-mock issue to continue the discussion there.

[willfaught]

See maraino/go-mock@341395f