Comments (7)
FWIW, How to do Wide Review says "Much of this document focuses on how and when to conduct horizontal reviews, but they are only a subset of a full wide review, which must also include other stakeholders..."
@nigelmegitt has an open issue on that document saying "Title is about Wide Review, contents are about Horizontal Review"
from w3process.
Both Wide Review and Horizontal Review are defined, and HR is a subset of WR.
I agree that during eg WG conversations about the two it is common for the terms to be interchanged confusingly but I don't think changing the name will fix this; rather the problem would likely just transfer to whatever new name is chosen.
But the issue as raised points to another solution that might fit thought patterns more easily, which is to define two mutually exclusive classes of review, being Internal and External, where the current HR + review by other W3C groups is Internal and review by everyone else is External.
from w3process.
[[
tzviya: I think this is one of the confusing points of the process. People generally use the terms interchangeably even though we know they're not. We should clarify.
fantasai: I think this is largely a problem with how we have been educating people on these terms. E.g. the document on wide review is 95% on horizontal review.
… the part that's outside horizontal review gets lost because we don't talk about it, and it doesn't have formal structure.
6.2.2.1. Wide Review
florian: I agree there is confusion, Elika's hypothesis on why is plausible. Maybe we should start there.
… as to Tzviya's point about simplification, I agree, but we should not talk about process simplification in general, we need to be specific. Maybe this is one of those specific points, maybe it isn't. We should be detailed.
plh: I don't hear anyone saying the process is broken...
… we could decide to push this to the guidebook first? it's not clear this is an actual process issue.
florian: maybe we should start there, and if it becomes obvious there is a process problem here, we circle back
… absent a specific idea, I would start with the Guide.
plh: the proposal is to move this to the Guide.
… this will be posted there unless someone reacts within a week
]]
https://www.w3.org/2023/09/27-w3process-minutes.html#t04
from w3process.
perhaps we need to clarify that wide review has at least these components:
- horizontal review by groups with a specific area of horizontal concern (notably acessibility, i18n, and architecture/TAG)
- an explicit opportunity and request for consortium review (membership, team and IEs)
- an opportunity and request for public review
from w3process.
an explicit opportunity and request for consortium review (membership, team and IEs)
Do we request consortium review? I know we explicitly request review from W3C groups that are listed in the publishing WG's Charter, and there is probably some generic automated email that goes to some wide groups of people saying "new FPWD" or "patent exclusion opportunity", but I don't count those generic automated emails as being effective tools for requesting consortium review - they're either being piped to legal teams or dropped to the bottom of the priority pile of busy people.
It'd probably be a good idea though, because when we do finally get around to a proper consortium review, which is AC review of CR exit, that is uncomfortably late to receive negative comments.
from w3process.
Yes, an AC vote is the formal review by the consortium members. yes, getting those review comments earlier would be better
from w3process.
Right - the Process requires Wide Review for entering CR, but that definitely does not require AC review.
from w3process.
Related Issues (20)
- What kind of Group is for what kind of work? HOT 1
- TAG Appointment Process Shortcomings HOT 25
- AB Role in TAG Appointment HOT 13
- Are TAG Appointments mandatory for the Team to fill?
- Ground the different types of groups / maturity stages in Problem Statements HOT 4
- Strip section 6.2.2.1 “wide review” of the mailing list currently mentioned HOT 1
- Affiliation constraints on TAG membership HOT 17
- Chair should be required in charter HOT 38
- Run link checker on Process Drafts HOT 3
- Determining AC Consensus of Post-Review Changes HOT 8
- Description of the role of the AB HOT 9
- TAG appointment ambiguity about ratification by both AB and TAG HOT 14
- Ambiguity about (super) majority thresholds: of those voting, or of those eligible to vote? HOT 8
- Dealing with procedural disagreements within the Council
- Multiple possible outcomes of a successful AC Appeal HOT 2
- Align with Bylaws changes
- Making the Council's short circuit a little more flexible HOT 10
- Member Associations to Liaison Relationships HOT 2
- Creating a more visible banner for old process documents HOT 2
- Retire the "Streamlined Publication Approval" system HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from w3process.