WG repo? about miniapp

[xfq]

I personally prefer the third option because the cost of managing IPR issues and the cost of potential transfer of the specs are the lowest. However, I will not object if the active participants in this group prefer the first or the second option.

[xfq]

Related discussions:

• https://www.w3.org/2020/12/10-miniapp-minutes.html#t03
• https://www.w3.org/2021/01/14-miniapp-minutes.html#t02
• https://www.w3.org/2021/03/04-miniapp-minutes.html#t01

[xfq]

These are the three options mentioned:

1. one repo for all the work in the CG and WG
2. two repos, one for CG, one for WG
3. multiple repos, one for each spec

[zhangyongjing]

I'm flexible on this issue and would be happy to follow the most common practice in W3C - what I heard is opt 3.

[xfq]

OK, I propose that we discuss this issue at this week's CG meeting, and hopefully we can reach consensus on this issue.

[Sharonzd]

Your opinions looks good to me. And we can maintain a specs list page in wg or cg.