Enhancement ideas about radiant

[vnijs]

Done:

• Change Data > Merge to Data > Combine and add intersect(), union(), setdiff(), bind_rows() and bind_cols()

[haughp]

Any plans to branch out into forecasting (ETS, ARIMA, NNETAR etc) and Arules (Association rules mining).

Great work BTW...

[vnijs]

@haughp I do intend to create additional modules/app that build on the base functionality in Radiant. ETS/Forecasting is one but Customer/Predictive Analytics is a higher priority because I'll be teaching a course in this space (relatively) soon. The issue is finding time to implement new features :)

Just curious ... What are you be interested in using this for? A class? If so, what is the class?

[haughp]

hi, I would like to build out a platform for use at a production level.
Radiant has allot of features I would like to integrate into the platform.
Forecasting and association rules analysis is something I would like to
build in also. I haven't had a deep dive under the hood of radiant,
hopefully this is something I can add.
On 22 Jun 2015 23:35, "Vincent Nijs" [email protected] wrote:

@haughp https://github.com/haughp I do intend to create additional
modules/app that build on the base functionality in Radiant.
ETS/Forecasting is one but Customer/Predictive Analytics is a higher
priority because I'll be teaching a course in this space (relatively) soon.
The issue is finding time to implement new features :)

Just curious ... What are you be interested in using this for? A class? If
so, what is the class?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#13 (comment).

[vnijs]

Interesting. Can you expand on what you mean by 'at a production level'? Just in case it is relevant for you ... Radiant has a strong copy-left / open source license.

[haughp]

We would like to build out a production level business analytic s platform,
This is for internal business use only!!

The approach you have taken with radiant is something of interest and
something we would like to investigate further.

Is this something that you believe would be in violation of the licence?

On 23 June 2015 at 18:07, Vincent Nijs [email protected] wrote:

Interesting. Can you expand on what you mean by 'at a production level'?
Just in case it is relevant for you ... Radiant has a strong copy-left /
open source license.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#13 (comment).

[vnijs]

Good question. There is no problem using the tool internally. You can even modify the code for internal use. See the link below about the GPL license which is similar to the AGPL license I have for Radiant. For any use outside the organization you would need to open-source the code.

Of course I hope that you would contribute improvements and extensions where possible. My hope/plan is to use https://github.com/radiant-rstats for this purpose. Here different projects could work from a common base and then customize for different areas/tools as needed.

I'd be happy to take more about this through email ([email protected]).

http://stackoverflow.com/a/1492956/1974918

[vnijs]

Radiant development has been moved to https://github.com/radiant-rstats. Updated documentation is available at https://radiant-rstats.github.io/docs/

As soon as the development versions of Shiny and DT hit CRAN I'll push the new Radiant packages as well

Please open any new issues at https://github.com/radiant-rstats/radiant/issues