Switch to MIT license about libtmux

[leezu]

Fine with me. Thanks for your work on this.

[gandelman-a]

No problem from me, thanks for the heads up!

…

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Leonard ***@***.***> wrote: Fine with me. Thanks for your work on this. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#46 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQuh0qqomQDbxM0-HBkL_RbK1mML1dAks5r-Nx3gaJpZM4NohK6> .

[minijackson]

Sounds perfect to me ;-)

[kaushalmodi]

Fine by me, thanks.

[sloria]

Sounds good to me.

[dankrause]

A agree with a switch to the MIT license.

[geekli]

No problem

[tony]

Great so far. Only 3 signatures left.

@tek @huwenchao @robled, do you agree to license your contributions to libtmux under the MIT license? If you do, reply that you agree!

[tek]

sure!

[robled]

Approved.

…

On 06/21/2017 12:57 AM, Tony Narlock wrote: Great so far. Only 3 signatures left. @tek <https://github.com/tek> @huwenchao <https://github.com/huwenchao> @robled <https://github.com/robled>, do you agree to license your contributions to libtmux under the MIT license <https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>? If you do, reply that you agree! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#46 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEBKOtp7IkSXaznhIbbrGRUp4y2SFq3ks5sGKKjgaJpZM4NohK6>.

[tony]

@huwenchao, do you approve the license change?

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had
recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you
for your contributions.

This bot is used to handle issues where the issue hasn't been discussed or
has gone out of date. If an issue isn't resolved and handled in a certain
period of time, it may be closed. If you would like your issue re-opened,
please create a fresh issue with the latest, up to date information and
mention this issue in it.

[dankrause]

@huwenchao has contributed one single line to this project:

https://github.com/tony/libtmux/blame/master/README.rst#L101

Perhaps there is something we can do to push the MIT licensing forward without that contribution.

[tony]

@dankrause Correct. We can.

BSD licenses aren't viral. The codebase can be MIT except for that one commit.

And technically we could rebase it out.

@huwenchao One more try, are you OK relicensing your commit MIT? We only need one person left for this!

[tony]

It's been several months of asking. 86e1089 by @huwenchao is a typo. This is getting out of hand. We obviously want spelling corrections, but we can't hold up a LICENSE change forever.

I'm going to revert @huwenchao's typo fix. Then redo the typo myself (by inference licensing it MIT), thanking @huwenchao, linking to the original ref (licensed BSD).

[tony]

See the revert at 350248c.

See the typo fixed by me, licensed MIT, thanking @huwenchao at 928ecc1.