Argonaut about argo

[gfontenot]

Looks rad!

• Your mapJSON function looks super similar to our global decode functions that are currently on master and will be shipped with 1.0.
• I'm a huge fan of the idea of RAC extensions for Argo. I don't think we'd want to include them in Argo proper, but I'd be really interested in a library that just did that
• Default extensions for common types like NSURL are something we've talked about a lot internally. I think we decided against including them in Argo itself, because there are plenty of cases where you'd want to customize that decoding, and we didn't want to add a roadblock to users wanting to do that. But I think shipping those extensions with an external lib is a fantastic idea (and I'd probably use it)

Have you thought about breaking the NSURL/CLLocation stuff out away from the RAC extensions? I'm a huge fan of small micro-frameworks.

I'd love to see more of these kinds of libraries. If they start to show up, We should look at creating some sort of centralized list of helper libs.

[aschuch]

Gordon, thanks for your quick feedback.

• Oh, I haven't been aware that decode already made it to master, once 1.0 is out, my mapJSON functions are probably not needed any more.
• I am also a huge fan of small micro-frameworks! I updated the repo, kept the RAC extensions in Argonaut and created a new micro-framework for common types called GoldenFleece (that's what the Argonauts were looking for after all ⛵️).

My biggest issue for providing a framework for common types is that its basically "all or nothing" and I don't think there is a way to work around that limitation (i.e. override the extension?). I think it should be possible with CocoaPods subspecs, but I am not aware of a way to currently achieve something similar with Carthage.

I know GoldenFleece is just a small start, but I'd love to see some active contributions for other types as well. ⚡️

[gfontenot]

Solid naming.

I am not aware of a way to currently achieve something similar with Carthage.

You could have multiple frameworks in your Xcode project, one for each type, and then an umbrella framework that brings in all of them. That might be a cool experiment.

I know GoldenFleece is just a small start, but I'd love to see some active contributions for other types as well.

+1

[tonyd256]

Love that name!

[aschuch]

You could have multiple frameworks in your Xcode project, one for each type, and then an umbrella framework that brings in all of them. That might be a cool experiment.

Yes, I think that's the way to go. 👍

[tonyd256]

Going to close this for now. Feel free to reopen or open a new issue if you have more questions.